中国脑血管病杂志
中國腦血管病雜誌
중국뇌혈관병잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES
2014年
5期
233-237
,共5页
屈亚平%孙丽%朱琳%宋为群
屈亞平%孫麗%硃琳%宋為群
굴아평%손려%주림%송위군
卒中%康复%下肢平衡训练%特定任务性平板训练%步行功能
卒中%康複%下肢平衡訓練%特定任務性平闆訓練%步行功能
졸중%강복%하지평형훈련%특정임무성평판훈련%보행공능
Stroke%Rehabilitation%Balance training%Task-specific walking training%Walking function
目的:探讨Biodex平衡训练系统辅助特定性平板步行训练对卒中后下肢运动功能的影响。方法选取卒中后平衡和下肢运动功能障碍的偏瘫患者40例,按病例号奇偶数分为平衡训练组和常规训练组,每组20例。常规训练组给予常规康复治疗及传统的平衡训练,平衡训练组在常规康复治疗的基础上,应用Biodex平衡训练系统辅助特定任务性平板步行训练。于治疗前及治疗后4周评价两组患者的下肢稳定性指数、Berg平衡量表评分(BBS)、“起立-行走”计时(TUGT)、最大步速和步长、Fugl-Meyer运动功能量表(下肢部分)评分(FMA-L)、改良Barthel指数(MBI)及功能性步行量表评分(FAC),综合评定患者的平衡和下肢运动功能。结果治疗前,两组患者的各项指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,两组患者各项指标均较治疗前好转,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);平衡训练组与常规训练组比较,稳定性指数(分别为6.5±1.3、8.5±2.1)、BBS评分[分别为(49±4)、(34±3)分]、TUGT[分别为(13.5±3.2)、(22.3±2.8)s]、最大步速[分别为(60±23)、(50±21)m/min]、最大步长[分别为(54±12)、(42±11)m]、FMA评分[分别为(31±4)、(24±5)分]、MBI评分[分别为(81±14)、(70±11)分]及FAC分级评分[分别为(4.31±0.39)、(3.21±0.19)分]改善程度均优于常规训练组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01或P<0.05)。结论应用Biodex平衡训练系统辅助特定任务性平板步行训练对卒中后患者的平衡和下肢运动功能有很好的改善作用。
目的:探討Biodex平衡訓練繫統輔助特定性平闆步行訓練對卒中後下肢運動功能的影響。方法選取卒中後平衡和下肢運動功能障礙的偏癱患者40例,按病例號奇偶數分為平衡訓練組和常規訓練組,每組20例。常規訓練組給予常規康複治療及傳統的平衡訓練,平衡訓練組在常規康複治療的基礎上,應用Biodex平衡訓練繫統輔助特定任務性平闆步行訓練。于治療前及治療後4週評價兩組患者的下肢穩定性指數、Berg平衡量錶評分(BBS)、“起立-行走”計時(TUGT)、最大步速和步長、Fugl-Meyer運動功能量錶(下肢部分)評分(FMA-L)、改良Barthel指數(MBI)及功能性步行量錶評分(FAC),綜閤評定患者的平衡和下肢運動功能。結果治療前,兩組患者的各項指標比較,差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05)。治療後,兩組患者各項指標均較治療前好轉,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01);平衡訓練組與常規訓練組比較,穩定性指數(分彆為6.5±1.3、8.5±2.1)、BBS評分[分彆為(49±4)、(34±3)分]、TUGT[分彆為(13.5±3.2)、(22.3±2.8)s]、最大步速[分彆為(60±23)、(50±21)m/min]、最大步長[分彆為(54±12)、(42±11)m]、FMA評分[分彆為(31±4)、(24±5)分]、MBI評分[分彆為(81±14)、(70±11)分]及FAC分級評分[分彆為(4.31±0.39)、(3.21±0.19)分]改善程度均優于常規訓練組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01或P<0.05)。結論應用Biodex平衡訓練繫統輔助特定任務性平闆步行訓練對卒中後患者的平衡和下肢運動功能有很好的改善作用。
목적:탐토Biodex평형훈련계통보조특정성평판보행훈련대졸중후하지운동공능적영향。방법선취졸중후평형화하지운동공능장애적편탄환자40례,안병례호기우수분위평형훈련조화상규훈련조,매조20례。상규훈련조급여상규강복치료급전통적평형훈련,평형훈련조재상규강복치료적기출상,응용Biodex평형훈련계통보조특정임무성평판보행훈련。우치료전급치료후4주평개량조환자적하지은정성지수、Berg평형량표평분(BBS)、“기립-행주”계시(TUGT)、최대보속화보장、Fugl-Meyer운동공능량표(하지부분)평분(FMA-L)、개량Barthel지수(MBI)급공능성보행량표평분(FAC),종합평정환자적평형화하지운동공능。결과치료전,량조환자적각항지표비교,차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05)。치료후,량조환자각항지표균교치료전호전,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01);평형훈련조여상규훈련조비교,은정성지수(분별위6.5±1.3、8.5±2.1)、BBS평분[분별위(49±4)、(34±3)분]、TUGT[분별위(13.5±3.2)、(22.3±2.8)s]、최대보속[분별위(60±23)、(50±21)m/min]、최대보장[분별위(54±12)、(42±11)m]、FMA평분[분별위(31±4)、(24±5)분]、MBI평분[분별위(81±14)、(70±11)분]급FAC분급평분[분별위(4.31±0.39)、(3.21±0.19)분]개선정도균우우상규훈련조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01혹P<0.05)。결론응용Biodex평형훈련계통보조특정임무성평판보행훈련대졸중후환자적평형화하지운동공능유흔호적개선작용。
Objective To investigate the effects of Biodex system assisted task-specific walking training on lower limb motor function after stroke. Methods Forty hemiplegic patients with balance and lower limb motor dysfunction after stroke were enrolled. They were divided into either a balance training group or a control group according to their case numbers (n=20 in each group). The control group only received conventional rehabilitation treatment. On the basis of conventional rehabilitation treatment,the patients in the balance training group also received Biodex system assisted task-specific walking training. The stability index of lower-extremity,Berg Balance Scale (BBS)score,Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT), maximum walking speed and stride length,Fugl-Meyer Assessment (lower-extremity)(FMA-L)score, modified Barthel Index (MBI),and Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC)were used to evaluate the patients of both groups before treatment and 4 weeks after treatment. The balance and lower extremity motor function of the patients were assessed comprehensively. Results Before treatment,there were no significant differences in various indicators between the two groups (P>0. 05). After treatment,all the indicators were better than before treatment in both groups. There were significant differences (P<0. 01);the improvement degrees of the stability index (6. 5 ± 1. 3 vs. 8. 5 ± 2. 1),BBS score (49 ± 4 vs. 34 ± 3 min),TUGT (13. 5 ± 3. 2 s vs. 22. 3 ± 2. 8 s),maximum walking speed (60 ± 23 m/min vs. 50 ± 21 m/min),maximum stride length (54 ± 12 m vs. 42 ± 11 m),FMA score (31 ± 4 vs. 24 ± 5),MBI score (81 ± 14 vs. 70 ± 11), and FAC grading score (4. 31 ± 0. 39 vs. 3. 21 ± 0. 19)of the balance training group were all better than those of the control group. There were significant differences (P <0. 01 or P <0. 05 ). Conclusion Using Biodex system assisted task-specific walking training has a obvious improvement for the balance and lower limb motor function in patients after stroke.