国际医药卫生导报
國際醫藥衛生導報
국제의약위생도보
INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE & HEALTH GUIDANCE NEWS
2009年
20期
17-20
,共4页
黄伟光%吴同果%韦建瑞%罗景云%赵强%崔进%郭晓碧
黃偉光%吳同果%韋建瑞%囉景雲%趙彊%崔進%郭曉碧
황위광%오동과%위건서%라경운%조강%최진%곽효벽
老年人%桡动脉%股动脉%血管成形术%经腔%经皮冠状动脉
老年人%橈動脈%股動脈%血管成形術%經腔%經皮冠狀動脈
노년인%뇨동맥%고동맥%혈관성형술%경강%경피관상동맥
Aged%Radial artery%Femoral artery%Angioplasty%transluminal%pereutaneons coronary
目的 评价老年冠心病经桡动脉穿刺介入治疗的安全性及疗效.方法 选择2007年3月~2009年5月60岁以上老年冠心病患者314例行冠状动脉介入治疗,按穿刺途径随机分成桡动脉组(n=157)和股动脉组(n=157),观察两组间手术成功率、动脉穿刺时间、手术操作时间、x线曝光时间、外周血管并发症和术后肺栓塞发生情况.结果 经桡动脉穿刺途径成功共149例,经股动脉穿刺途径成功共152例.两组间手术成功率、X线曝光时间、手术时间等比较,差异无显著性(P>0.05).动脉穿刺时间桡动脉组明显多于股动脉组(P<0.05),外周血管并发症桡动脉组明显少于股动脉组(P<0.05),在股动脉组术后肺栓塞发生2例,而桡动脉组0例.总介入治疗手术成功率为98.1%(308/31 4).结论 只要规范化操作,老年冠心病经桡动脉穿刺介入治疗方法安全、有效且可行,术后外周血管并发症发生少.
目的 評價老年冠心病經橈動脈穿刺介入治療的安全性及療效.方法 選擇2007年3月~2009年5月60歲以上老年冠心病患者314例行冠狀動脈介入治療,按穿刺途徑隨機分成橈動脈組(n=157)和股動脈組(n=157),觀察兩組間手術成功率、動脈穿刺時間、手術操作時間、x線曝光時間、外週血管併髮癥和術後肺栓塞髮生情況.結果 經橈動脈穿刺途徑成功共149例,經股動脈穿刺途徑成功共152例.兩組間手術成功率、X線曝光時間、手術時間等比較,差異無顯著性(P>0.05).動脈穿刺時間橈動脈組明顯多于股動脈組(P<0.05),外週血管併髮癥橈動脈組明顯少于股動脈組(P<0.05),在股動脈組術後肺栓塞髮生2例,而橈動脈組0例.總介入治療手術成功率為98.1%(308/31 4).結論 隻要規範化操作,老年冠心病經橈動脈穿刺介入治療方法安全、有效且可行,術後外週血管併髮癥髮生少.
목적 평개노년관심병경뇨동맥천자개입치료적안전성급료효.방법 선택2007년3월~2009년5월60세이상노년관심병환자314례행관상동맥개입치료,안천자도경수궤분성뇨동맥조(n=157)화고동맥조(n=157),관찰량조간수술성공솔、동맥천자시간、수술조작시간、x선폭광시간、외주혈관병발증화술후폐전새발생정황.결과 경뇨동맥천자도경성공공149례,경고동맥천자도경성공공152례.량조간수술성공솔、X선폭광시간、수술시간등비교,차이무현저성(P>0.05).동맥천자시간뇨동맥조명현다우고동맥조(P<0.05),외주혈관병발증뇨동맥조명현소우고동맥조(P<0.05),재고동맥조술후폐전새발생2례,이뇨동맥조0례.총개입치료수술성공솔위98.1%(308/31 4).결론 지요규범화조작,노년관심병경뇨동맥천자개입치료방법안전、유효차가행,술후외주혈관병발증발생소.
Objective To evaluate the safety and effect oftransradial artery approach for coronary intervention in the aged.Methods There were 314 cases which were more than 60 years old with coronary artery disease in hospital from Mar 2007 to May 2009, who accepted coronary intervention.They were randomly divided into Transradial group(TRA, n=157) and Transfemoral group(TRF, n=157).The success rate and time of puncture, x-ray exposure time, procedure duration, complication in puncture site and pulmonary embolism were observed in the two groups.Results 149 out of 157 cases success in TRA group and 155 cases in TRF group.The success rate was not different.The success rate of puncture,xray exposure time and procedure duration had no difference between the two groups.But the complication in puncture site and pulmonary embolism were more in TRF group than in TRA group. Conclusions Pereutaneous transradial artery approach is secure and effective for coronary intervention treatment in the aged and has few vascular complications.