中国肿瘤临床
中國腫瘤臨床
중국종류림상
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
2014年
18期
1163-1165
,共3页
李冰%李鹏%巩方明%严永峰%孙鹏%贾宝庆
李冰%李鵬%鞏方明%嚴永峰%孫鵬%賈寶慶
리빙%리붕%공방명%엄영봉%손붕%가보경
鼻空肠管%空肠造瘘管%全胃切除术%肠内营养
鼻空腸管%空腸造瘺管%全胃切除術%腸內營養
비공장관%공장조루관%전위절제술%장내영양
nasojejunal tube%jejunostomy tube%total gastrectomy%enteral nutrition
目的:评估鼻空肠管与空肠造瘘管置入术在全胃切除术患者中行肠内营养的效果。方法:将86例进展期胃癌患者随机分为两组,A组:43例采用鼻空肠管置入术行肠内营养治疗;B组:43例运用空肠造瘘管置入术进行肠内营养治疗,比较两组肠内营养疗效及并发症。结果:B组肛门排气时间、排便时间比A组更短(P<0.05);B组术后营养指标优于A组(P>0.05);A、B组耐受性差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);并发症发生率两组不存在明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:对全胃切除术后患者实施空肠造瘘管置入术行肠内营养,耐受性更好,放置时间更长,可以显著改善患者的营养状态。
目的:評估鼻空腸管與空腸造瘺管置入術在全胃切除術患者中行腸內營養的效果。方法:將86例進展期胃癌患者隨機分為兩組,A組:43例採用鼻空腸管置入術行腸內營養治療;B組:43例運用空腸造瘺管置入術進行腸內營養治療,比較兩組腸內營養療效及併髮癥。結果:B組肛門排氣時間、排便時間比A組更短(P<0.05);B組術後營養指標優于A組(P>0.05);A、B組耐受性差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);併髮癥髮生率兩組不存在明顯差異(P>0.05)。結論:對全胃切除術後患者實施空腸造瘺管置入術行腸內營養,耐受性更好,放置時間更長,可以顯著改善患者的營養狀態。
목적:평고비공장관여공장조루관치입술재전위절제술환자중행장내영양적효과。방법:장86례진전기위암환자수궤분위량조,A조:43례채용비공장관치입술행장내영양치료;B조:43례운용공장조루관치입술진행장내영양치료,비교량조장내영양료효급병발증。결과:B조항문배기시간、배편시간비A조경단(P<0.05);B조술후영양지표우우A조(P>0.05);A、B조내수성차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);병발증발생솔량조불존재명현차이(P>0.05)。결론:대전위절제술후환자실시공장조루관치입술행장내영양,내수성경호,방치시간경장,가이현저개선환자적영양상태。
Objective: To evaluate the intestinal trophic effects and adverse reactions of nasojejunal and jejunostomy tube im-plants on patients with total gastrectomy. Methods:A total of 86 patients with advanced gastric cancer were randomly and equally di-vided into two groups. Groups A and B received enteral nutrition therapies through nasojejunal and jejunostomy feeding tube implants, respectively. The therapeutic efficacy of the two methods of enteral nutrition therapy and the corresponding adverse reactions observed in the two groups were compared. Results:Group B patients demonstrated shorter anal evacuation and defecation times than group A patients, the difference is statistically significant (P<0.05). Moreover, the bodyweight, total protein, and albumin levels of the patients significantly decreased in both groups after enteral nutrition therapy was administered (P<0.05). Postoperative nutritive indexes were higher in group B than in group A;however, no significant difference was obtained between the two groups (P>0.05). Nonetheless, the patients in group B tolerated the treatment well compared with those in group A (P<0.05). The complication rates of groups A and B were 18.6%and 23.3%, respectively, but this difference was not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion:Patients subjected to total gastrecto-my showed higher tolerance to jejunal tube implants for enteral nutrition than to nasojejunal tube implants, indicating that jejunal tube implants can be used to improve the nutritional status of patients.