中华外科杂志
中華外科雜誌
중화외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF SURGERY
2014年
10期
745-749
,共5页
刁垠泽%孙宇%王少波%张凤山%潘胜发%刘晓光%刘忠军
刁垠澤%孫宇%王少波%張鳳山%潘勝髮%劉曉光%劉忠軍
조은택%손우%왕소파%장봉산%반성발%류효광%류충군
颈椎%脊髓%磁共振成像%脊髓压迫症
頸椎%脊髓%磁共振成像%脊髓壓迫癥
경추%척수%자공진성상%척수압박증
Cervical vertebrae%Spinal cord%Magnetic resonance image%Spinal cord compression
目的 了解第2至第7颈椎(C2~7)椎板成形术对脊髓前间隙(ACS)的影响,并与传统的第3至第7颈椎(C3~7)椎板成形术比较,为合理的向头侧扩大减压范围提供依据.方法 对2008年2月至201 1年10月行颈后路单开门椎板成形术57例患者的资料进行回顾性分析.按减压节段的不同分为C3~7组(32例)和C2~7组(25例).比较各组手术前后神经功能、颈肩痛以及颈椎曲度;测量并比较两组患者术后MRI上C2~3至C7 ~T1各节段ACS数值.结果 两组患者手术后神经功能均有显著改善,颈肩痛程度及颈椎曲度较术前差异无统计学意义;C3~7组在C2~3及C3~4水平上ACS分别为6.13 mm(95% CI:5.71 ~6.55)和6.60 mm(95% CI:6.10 ~7.11),与之相比,C2~7组在C2~3及C3~4水平上ACS分别增加2.5 mm和2.1 mm,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);两组在C4~5及以下水平ACS无明显差异.结论 与传统的C3~7单开门椎板成形术相比,向头侧扩大减压至C2,可以在C2~3及相邻的C3~4水平获得更大的ACS;当C3~4水平脊髓前方致压物在中矢径>6.10 mm时,行C3~7减压可能造成该水平脊髓减压不充分,应考虑向头侧扩大减压范围.
目的 瞭解第2至第7頸椎(C2~7)椎闆成形術對脊髓前間隙(ACS)的影響,併與傳統的第3至第7頸椎(C3~7)椎闆成形術比較,為閤理的嚮頭側擴大減壓範圍提供依據.方法 對2008年2月至201 1年10月行頸後路單開門椎闆成形術57例患者的資料進行迴顧性分析.按減壓節段的不同分為C3~7組(32例)和C2~7組(25例).比較各組手術前後神經功能、頸肩痛以及頸椎麯度;測量併比較兩組患者術後MRI上C2~3至C7 ~T1各節段ACS數值.結果 兩組患者手術後神經功能均有顯著改善,頸肩痛程度及頸椎麯度較術前差異無統計學意義;C3~7組在C2~3及C3~4水平上ACS分彆為6.13 mm(95% CI:5.71 ~6.55)和6.60 mm(95% CI:6.10 ~7.11),與之相比,C2~7組在C2~3及C3~4水平上ACS分彆增加2.5 mm和2.1 mm,兩組間差異有統計學意義(P<0.01);兩組在C4~5及以下水平ACS無明顯差異.結論 與傳統的C3~7單開門椎闆成形術相比,嚮頭側擴大減壓至C2,可以在C2~3及相鄰的C3~4水平穫得更大的ACS;噹C3~4水平脊髓前方緻壓物在中矢徑>6.10 mm時,行C3~7減壓可能造成該水平脊髓減壓不充分,應攷慮嚮頭側擴大減壓範圍.
목적 료해제2지제7경추(C2~7)추판성형술대척수전간극(ACS)적영향,병여전통적제3지제7경추(C3~7)추판성형술비교,위합리적향두측확대감압범위제공의거.방법 대2008년2월지201 1년10월행경후로단개문추판성형술57례환자적자료진행회고성분석.안감압절단적불동분위C3~7조(32례)화C2~7조(25례).비교각조수술전후신경공능、경견통이급경추곡도;측량병비교량조환자술후MRI상C2~3지C7 ~T1각절단ACS수치.결과 량조환자수술후신경공능균유현저개선,경견통정도급경추곡도교술전차이무통계학의의;C3~7조재C2~3급C3~4수평상ACS분별위6.13 mm(95% CI:5.71 ~6.55)화6.60 mm(95% CI:6.10 ~7.11),여지상비,C2~7조재C2~3급C3~4수평상ACS분별증가2.5 mm화2.1 mm,량조간차이유통계학의의(P<0.01);량조재C4~5급이하수평ACS무명현차이.결론 여전통적C3~7단개문추판성형술상비,향두측확대감압지C2,가이재C2~3급상린적C3~4수평획득경대적ACS;당C3~4수평척수전방치압물재중시경>6.10 mm시,행C3~7감압가능조성해수평척수감압불충분,응고필향두측확대감압범위.
Objectives To investigate the effect of C2-7 laminoplasty on postoperative anterior cord space (ACS) compared with C3-7 laminoplasty,and to provide evidence for reasonable enlargement of decompression range cephalad.Methods Fifty-seven Patients underwent cervical laminoplasty from February 2008 to October 2011 were studied retrospectively,which were divided into two groups by decompression range:Group C3-7 and Group C2-7.The pre-and post operative JOA scores,VAS scores of neek and shoulder pain,and cervical alignment were compared in each group.The postoperative ACS at each level from C2-3 to C7-T1 measured on MRI were compared between the two groups.Results The postoperative JOA scores increased significantly in both groups.VAS scores and cervical alignment showed no significant difference.ACS at C2-3 and C3-4 was 6.13 mm (95% CI:5.71-6.55) and 6.60 mm (95% CI:6.10-7.11) respectively in Group C3-7,which increased 2.5 mm and 2.1 mm respectively in Group C2-7 at the same segment,there was significant difference (P < 0.01).However,there was no significant difference of ACS at C4-5 and any other caudal levels between the two groups.Conclusions Compared with conventional C3-7 laminoplasty,the extensive decompression cephalad to C2 leads to larger ACS at C2-3 and C3-4.When the mid-sagittal diameter of anterior compression is more than 6.10 mm at C3-4,C3-7 laminoplasty may cause insufficient decompression,and enlargement of decompression range cephalad should be considered.