西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版)
西安建築科技大學學報(自然科學版)
서안건축과기대학학보(자연과학판)
JOURNAL OF XI'AN UNIVERSITY OF ARCHITECTURE & TECHNOLOGY
2014年
1期
16-21
,共6页
板梁桥%π型钢板%非线性%底板开裂%稳定性%ANSYS
闆樑橋%π型鋼闆%非線性%底闆開裂%穩定性%ANSYS
판량교%π형강판%비선성%저판개렬%은정성%ANSYS
plate-beam bridge%π-type steel%nonlinear%bottom crack%stability%ansys
由于超限超载车辆迅速增长,梁底开裂已成为板梁桥营运中的首要病害。以往所使用的粘贴钢板加固,钢材使用率低,加固效果并不理想。根据提高主梁抗弯刚度可减小主梁挠度及内力,并最终抑制梁底开裂的原理,首次提出π型钢板加固法。现利用 ANSYS 程序进行空间非线性有限元仿真计算。对π型钢板与粘贴钢板加固后主梁进行对比分析,得出π型钢板加固对提高主梁极限承载力、防止主梁底板开裂,效果优于粘贴钢板加固;对比分析使用不同腹板高度与钢板厚度的π型钢板加固后的主梁极限承载力,得出π型钢板腹板高度对提升加固效果的影响较钢板厚度大;进一步对比分析π型钢板应用于不同跨径板梁的稳定性问题,提出不同跨径板梁对π型钢板截面尺寸的具体要求。
由于超限超載車輛迅速增長,樑底開裂已成為闆樑橋營運中的首要病害。以往所使用的粘貼鋼闆加固,鋼材使用率低,加固效果併不理想。根據提高主樑抗彎剛度可減小主樑撓度及內力,併最終抑製樑底開裂的原理,首次提齣π型鋼闆加固法。現利用 ANSYS 程序進行空間非線性有限元倣真計算。對π型鋼闆與粘貼鋼闆加固後主樑進行對比分析,得齣π型鋼闆加固對提高主樑極限承載力、防止主樑底闆開裂,效果優于粘貼鋼闆加固;對比分析使用不同腹闆高度與鋼闆厚度的π型鋼闆加固後的主樑極限承載力,得齣π型鋼闆腹闆高度對提升加固效果的影響較鋼闆厚度大;進一步對比分析π型鋼闆應用于不同跨徑闆樑的穩定性問題,提齣不同跨徑闆樑對π型鋼闆截麵呎吋的具體要求。
유우초한초재차량신속증장,량저개렬이성위판량교영운중적수요병해。이왕소사용적점첩강판가고,강재사용솔저,가고효과병불이상。근거제고주량항만강도가감소주량뇨도급내력,병최종억제량저개렬적원리,수차제출π형강판가고법。현이용 ANSYS 정서진행공간비선성유한원방진계산。대π형강판여점첩강판가고후주량진행대비분석,득출π형강판가고대제고주량겁한승재력、방지주량저판개렬,효과우우점첩강판가고;대비분석사용불동복판고도여강판후도적π형강판가고후적주량겁한승재력,득출π형강판복판고도대제승가고효과적영향교강판후도대;진일보대비분석π형강판응용우불동과경판량적은정성문제,제출불동과경판량대π형강판절면척촌적구체요구。
Due to the factors of vehicles overloading, cracking on plate beam bottom has become one of the primary problems in plate-beam bridge operations. In sticking steel slab technology, steel products utilization rate is low, so the reinforcement effect is not ideal. According to the principle that the increase of the primary beam flexural stiffness can decrease the maximum vertical deflection and internal forces of the primary beam under the same load, and eventually reduce the beam bottom cracks, the author first proposed the π-type steel strengthening technology. And by utilizing ANSYS program to carry out the space nonlinear finite element simulation calculation, the author compared the effect of primary beam bottom crack prevention by changingπ-type steel height and ribbed slab thickness with sticking steel slab technology, Following are the conclusions drawn by the authors:the resisting force and the ability to resist deformation of the plate beam in the limit state of the former case improved a lot more than the latter one, and the effect of improving capacity and preventing primary beam bottom crack is better by usingπ-type steel technology than sticking steel slab technology. The author also further compared and analyzed the stability problem of π-type steel used for plate beam with different lengths and optimized theπ-type steel cross section dimensions.