东南大学学报(英文版)
東南大學學報(英文版)
동남대학학보(영문판)
JOURNAL OF SOUTHEAST UNIVERSITY
2014年
1期
84-87
,共4页
朱玉琴%倪富健%顾兴宇
硃玉琴%倪富健%顧興宇
주옥금%예부건%고흥우
永久性路面%富油抗疲劳层%路面使用性能%全寿命周期费用分析
永久性路麵%富油抗疲勞層%路麵使用性能%全壽命週期費用分析
영구성로면%부유항피로층%로면사용성능%전수명주기비용분석
perpetual pavement%rich binder layer%pavement performance%life cycle cost analysis
研究了江苏省沿江高速公路永久性路面试验段的路面使用性能和经济适用性。对试验段路面性能进行连续监测,对比了通车以后8年内含有富油抗疲劳层(RBL)的永久性路面、不含富油抗疲劳层的永久性路面与普通半刚性基层沥青路面的弯沉、裂缝和车辙状况及发展规律,并通过全寿命周期费用分析法(LCCA)对各路段进行经济评价。通过性能对比和 LCCA 分析发现:含富油抗疲劳层的沥青结构具有良好的抗裂缝性能,但是抗永久性变形能力不足;传统的半刚性基层沥青路面因在服务寿命内需要更频繁的养护而经济性不足。研究结果表明:不含富油抗疲劳层的永久性路面结构是本地较为适用的一种永久性路面结构。
研究瞭江囌省沿江高速公路永久性路麵試驗段的路麵使用性能和經濟適用性。對試驗段路麵性能進行連續鑑測,對比瞭通車以後8年內含有富油抗疲勞層(RBL)的永久性路麵、不含富油抗疲勞層的永久性路麵與普通半剛性基層瀝青路麵的彎沉、裂縫和車轍狀況及髮展規律,併通過全壽命週期費用分析法(LCCA)對各路段進行經濟評價。通過性能對比和 LCCA 分析髮現:含富油抗疲勞層的瀝青結構具有良好的抗裂縫性能,但是抗永久性變形能力不足;傳統的半剛性基層瀝青路麵因在服務壽命內需要更頻繁的養護而經濟性不足。研究結果錶明:不含富油抗疲勞層的永久性路麵結構是本地較為適用的一種永久性路麵結構。
연구료강소성연강고속공로영구성로면시험단적로면사용성능화경제괄용성。대시험단로면성능진행련속감측,대비료통차이후8년내함유부유항피로층(RBL)적영구성로면、불함부유항피로층적영구성로면여보통반강성기층력청로면적만침、렬봉화차철상황급발전규률,병통과전수명주기비용분석법(LCCA)대각로단진행경제평개。통과성능대비화 LCCA 분석발현:함부유항피로층적력청결구구유량호적항렬봉성능,단시항영구성변형능력불족;전통적반강성기층력청로면인재복무수명내수요경빈번적양호이경제성불족。연구결과표명:불함부유항피로층적영구성로면결구시본지교위괄용적일충영구성로면결구。
Pavement performance and economic efficiency are researched on the perpetual test pavement of Yijiang-Suzhou Express Highway in Jiangsu province China.Test sections were continuously monitored.The conditions and developing laws of deflection rutting and cracking are compared among the perpetual pavement with the rich binder layer RBL the perpetual pavement without the RBL and the conventional semi-rigid asphalt pavement in the past eight years after opening for traffic.Economical evaluation is conducted via life cycle cost analysis LCCA .Based on the performance comparison and LCCA analysis sections with the RBL have good crack resistance but they are not very satisfactory in the aspect of permanent deformation the conventional semi-rigid asphalt pavement is the least economic one due to requiring more frequent maintenance.Research results show that the perpetual pavement without RBL is a more appropriate structure for the test site.