安徽警官职业学院学报
安徽警官職業學院學報
안휘경관직업학원학보
JOURNAL OF ANHUI VOCATIONAL COLLEGE OF POLICE OFFICERS
2014年
2期
39-42
,共4页
事后抢劫%凶器%对象%罪数
事後搶劫%兇器%對象%罪數
사후창겁%흉기%대상%죄수
post-event robbery%lethal weapon%object%number of crime
事后抢劫罪的前提条件是值得评价为“盗窃罪、诈骗罪或者抢夺罪”的行为；对“携带凶器盗窃”中“凶器”的认定宜采“客观危险﹢主观用途”的标准；为窝藏赃物、抗拒抓捕或者毁灭罪证而使用暴力或者以暴力相威胁的对象应限定为被告人观念上特定之人。
事後搶劫罪的前提條件是值得評價為“盜竊罪、詐騙罪或者搶奪罪”的行為；對“攜帶兇器盜竊”中“兇器”的認定宜採“客觀危險﹢主觀用途”的標準；為窩藏贜物、抗拒抓捕或者燬滅罪證而使用暴力或者以暴力相威脅的對象應限定為被告人觀唸上特定之人。
사후창겁죄적전제조건시치득평개위“도절죄、사편죄혹자창탈죄”적행위；대“휴대흉기도절”중“흉기”적인정의채“객관위험﹢주관용도”적표준；위와장장물、항거조포혹자훼멸죄증이사용폭력혹자이폭력상위협적대상응한정위피고인관념상특정지인。
The premises of post-event robbery are behaviors involving “theft, fraud or forcible seizure”. In term of theft with lethal weapon, the weapon should comply with the standard of “objective danger and subjective purpose”. The object of adopting violence or threat with violence for the purpose of concealing booties, resisting arrest or destruction of evidence should be restricted to a particular person of defendant properties.
