中国医药指南
中國醫藥指南
중국의약지남
CHINA MEDICINE GUIDE
2014年
18期
52-52,53
,共2页
护理干预%膝骨关节炎%效果分析
護理榦預%膝骨關節炎%效果分析
호리간예%슬골관절염%효과분석
Nursing interventions%Knee osteoarthritis%Effectiveness analysis
目的：探讨护理干预对膝骨关节炎患者的治疗效果和对护理干预的效果进行分析。方法将我院于2012年1月至2013年12月收治的122膝盖关节炎患者作为研究对象，随机分为观察组和对照组，每组61例。对照组患者接受常规的治疗和护理，观察组患者在常规治疗和护理的基础上，实施系统的护理干预。比较两组患者出院时膝骨关节炎的恢复效果，并对护理干预的效果进行分析。结果观察组和对照组患者功能恢复的有效例数分别为59例和42例，两组结果的差异显著，具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。膝关节功能评分改善情况、健康知识掌握情况、健康教育满意度评分比较治疗组明显优于对照组，两组比较，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论护理干预对膝骨关节炎患者的关节功能恢复具有十分显著的治疗效果，值得在临床广泛推广。
目的：探討護理榦預對膝骨關節炎患者的治療效果和對護理榦預的效果進行分析。方法將我院于2012年1月至2013年12月收治的122膝蓋關節炎患者作為研究對象，隨機分為觀察組和對照組，每組61例。對照組患者接受常規的治療和護理，觀察組患者在常規治療和護理的基礎上，實施繫統的護理榦預。比較兩組患者齣院時膝骨關節炎的恢複效果，併對護理榦預的效果進行分析。結果觀察組和對照組患者功能恢複的有效例數分彆為59例和42例，兩組結果的差異顯著，具有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。膝關節功能評分改善情況、健康知識掌握情況、健康教育滿意度評分比較治療組明顯優于對照組，兩組比較，差異有統計學意義（P<0.05）。結論護理榦預對膝骨關節炎患者的關節功能恢複具有十分顯著的治療效果，值得在臨床廣汎推廣。
목적：탐토호리간예대슬골관절염환자적치료효과화대호리간예적효과진행분석。방법장아원우2012년1월지2013년12월수치적122슬개관절염환자작위연구대상，수궤분위관찰조화대조조，매조61례。대조조환자접수상규적치료화호리，관찰조환자재상규치료화호리적기출상，실시계통적호리간예。비교량조환자출원시슬골관절염적회복효과，병대호리간예적효과진행분석。결과관찰조화대조조환자공능회복적유효례수분별위59례화42례，량조결과적차이현저，구유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。슬관절공능평분개선정황、건강지식장악정황、건강교육만의도평분비교치료조명현우우대조조，량조비교，차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론호리간예대슬골관절염환자적관절공능회복구유십분현저적치료효과，치득재림상엄범추엄。
Objective To investigate the effects of nursing interventions for the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and to analyze the effects of nursing interventions. Methods In our hospital from January 2012 to December 2013 admitted 122 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee as research subjects were randomly divided into observation group and control group 61 cases. Control patients received conventional treatment and care, observe patients in the conventional treatment and care, the implementation of the system of nursing interventions. Restoration of knee osteoarthritis, and to analyze the effects of nursing interventions when comparing two groups of patients discharged. Results The results of valid cases in the observation group and the control group in patients with functional recovery were 59 cases and 42 cases, the results are significant differences between the two groups, with statistical significance (P<0.05). The function of knee joint score improvement, health knowledge, health education satisfaction score of the treatment group was significantly better than the control group, the two groups, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Nursing intervention on patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint function recovery with a very significant treatment effect, should be popularized in clinical practice.
