中国医师进修杂志
中國醫師進脩雜誌
중국의사진수잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF POSTGRADUATES OF MEDICINE
2014年
27期
1-4
,共4页
鼻窦炎%鼻内镜%鼻腔填塞
鼻竇炎%鼻內鏡%鼻腔填塞
비두염%비내경%비강전새
Sinusitis%Nasal endoscope%Nasal packing
目的 比较慢性鼻窦炎鼻内镜术后无鼻腔填塞与填塞的疗效,探讨术后无鼻腔填塞的可行性.方法 将82例1,2型慢性鼻窦炎患者按随机数字表法分为无填塞组(44例,75侧)和填塞组(38例,65侧),两组患者均采取术前抗炎、降压等治疗,在全身麻醉下手术.比较两组出血量、术后疼痛程度(采用视觉模拟评分,VAS)、黏膜水肿程度、疗效、术后并发症等.结果 两组出血量、疗效比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).无填塞组术后VAS明显低于填塞组[(2.46±0.54)分比(5.49±1.26)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).无填塞组与填塞组术后1周、术后6个月黏膜水肿评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但无填塞组术后1个月黏膜水肿评分明显低于填塞组[(1.32±0.63)分比(3.52±0.72)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).填塞组患者术后并发症较无填塞组明显增加.结论 对1,2型慢性鼻窦炎患者全身麻醉下行鼻内镜手术无明显出血时,可以不行鼻腔填塞,且有利于减轻患者的痛苦及减少术后并发症的发生.
目的 比較慢性鼻竇炎鼻內鏡術後無鼻腔填塞與填塞的療效,探討術後無鼻腔填塞的可行性.方法 將82例1,2型慢性鼻竇炎患者按隨機數字錶法分為無填塞組(44例,75側)和填塞組(38例,65側),兩組患者均採取術前抗炎、降壓等治療,在全身痳醉下手術.比較兩組齣血量、術後疼痛程度(採用視覺模擬評分,VAS)、黏膜水腫程度、療效、術後併髮癥等.結果 兩組齣血量、療效比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).無填塞組術後VAS明顯低于填塞組[(2.46±0.54)分比(5.49±1.26)分],差異有統計學意義(P<0.01).無填塞組與填塞組術後1週、術後6箇月黏膜水腫評分比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),但無填塞組術後1箇月黏膜水腫評分明顯低于填塞組[(1.32±0.63)分比(3.52±0.72)分],差異有統計學意義(P<0.01).填塞組患者術後併髮癥較無填塞組明顯增加.結論 對1,2型慢性鼻竇炎患者全身痳醉下行鼻內鏡手術無明顯齣血時,可以不行鼻腔填塞,且有利于減輕患者的痛苦及減少術後併髮癥的髮生.
목적 비교만성비두염비내경술후무비강전새여전새적료효,탐토술후무비강전새적가행성.방법 장82례1,2형만성비두염환자안수궤수자표법분위무전새조(44례,75측)화전새조(38례,65측),량조환자균채취술전항염、강압등치료,재전신마취하수술.비교량조출혈량、술후동통정도(채용시각모의평분,VAS)、점막수종정도、료효、술후병발증등.결과 량조출혈량、료효비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).무전새조술후VAS명현저우전새조[(2.46±0.54)분비(5.49±1.26)분],차이유통계학의의(P<0.01).무전새조여전새조술후1주、술후6개월점막수종평분비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),단무전새조술후1개월점막수종평분명현저우전새조[(1.32±0.63)분비(3.52±0.72)분],차이유통계학의의(P<0.01).전새조환자술후병발증교무전새조명현증가.결론 대1,2형만성비두염환자전신마취하행비내경수술무명현출혈시,가이불행비강전새,차유리우감경환자적통고급감소술후병발증적발생.
Objective To compare the efficacies between nasal packing and no nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic sinusitis,and explore the feasibility of no nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery.Methods Eighty-two type 1 or type 2 chronic sinusitis patients who received endoscopic sinus surgery under general anesthesia were divided into no nasal packing group (44 cases,75 sides) and nasal packing group (38 cases,65 sides) by random digits table method.The patients in 2 groups were taken preoperative anti-inflammatory and regulation blood pressure treatment.The volume of bleeding,postoperative pain (visual analogue score,VAS),degree of mucosal edema,efficacy and postoperative complications between 2 groups were compared.Results There were no statistical difference in volume of bleeding and efficacy between 2 groups (P > 0.05).The postoperative VAS in no nasal packing group was significantly lower than that in nasal packing group [(2.46 ± 0.54) scores vs.(5.49 ± 1.26) scores],there was statistical difference (P< 0.01).There was no statistical difference in mucosal edema score postoperative 1 week and 6 months between 2 groups (P > 0.05),but the mucosal edema score postoperative 1 month in no nasal packing group was significantly lower than that in nasal packing group [(1.32 ±0.63) scores vs.(3.52 ±0.72) scores],there was statistical difference (P < 0.01).Postoperative comphcations in nasal packing group were significantly more than those in no packing group.Conclusion No nasal packing can be performed for type 1 or type 2 chronic sinusitis patients who has no significant bleeding after endoscopic sinus surgery under general anesthesia,it is actually beneficial of relieving distress of the patient and reducing postoperative complications.