中国临床药理学杂志
中國臨床藥理學雜誌
중국림상약이학잡지
THE CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
2014年
4期
317-319
,共3页
右美托咪啶%腹部手术%全身麻醉
右美託咪啶%腹部手術%全身痳醉
우미탁미정%복부수술%전신마취
dexmedetomidine%abdominal surgery%general anesthesia
目的:探讨右美托咪啶( DEX )用于腹部手术患者的全麻效果、术后恢复质量及安全性。方法全身麻醉腹部手术患者91例随机分为试验组(44例)和对照组(47例)。对照组于麻醉诱导前15 min静脉滴注生理盐水15 mL,试验组静脉滴注DEX负荷剂量0.5μg· kg-1,随后以0.25μg· kg-1· h-1的速率输注直至拔除气管插管。观察比较2组患者自主呼吸恢复时间、苏醒时间、拔管时间及不良反应发生率。结果试验组麻醉苏醒期VRS镇痛评分为(2.4±0.8),对照组为(3.7±1.1),试验组显著低于对照组(P<0.05);苏醒期躁动及呛咳不良反应发生率,试验组显著低于对照组( P<0.05);2组患者自主呼吸恢复时间、拔除气管导管时间及苏醒时间差别无统计学意义( P>0.05)。结论 DEX用于腹部手术患者可显著增强全身麻醉效果,降低苏醒期不良反应发生率。
目的:探討右美託咪啶( DEX )用于腹部手術患者的全痳效果、術後恢複質量及安全性。方法全身痳醉腹部手術患者91例隨機分為試驗組(44例)和對照組(47例)。對照組于痳醉誘導前15 min靜脈滴註生理鹽水15 mL,試驗組靜脈滴註DEX負荷劑量0.5μg· kg-1,隨後以0.25μg· kg-1· h-1的速率輸註直至拔除氣管插管。觀察比較2組患者自主呼吸恢複時間、囌醒時間、拔管時間及不良反應髮生率。結果試驗組痳醉囌醒期VRS鎮痛評分為(2.4±0.8),對照組為(3.7±1.1),試驗組顯著低于對照組(P<0.05);囌醒期躁動及嗆咳不良反應髮生率,試驗組顯著低于對照組( P<0.05);2組患者自主呼吸恢複時間、拔除氣管導管時間及囌醒時間差彆無統計學意義( P>0.05)。結論 DEX用于腹部手術患者可顯著增彊全身痳醉效果,降低囌醒期不良反應髮生率。
목적:탐토우미탁미정( DEX )용우복부수술환자적전마효과、술후회복질량급안전성。방법전신마취복부수술환자91례수궤분위시험조(44례)화대조조(47례)。대조조우마취유도전15 min정맥적주생리염수15 mL,시험조정맥적주DEX부하제량0.5μg· kg-1,수후이0.25μg· kg-1· h-1적속솔수주직지발제기관삽관。관찰비교2조환자자주호흡회복시간、소성시간、발관시간급불량반응발생솔。결과시험조마취소성기VRS진통평분위(2.4±0.8),대조조위(3.7±1.1),시험조현저저우대조조(P<0.05);소성기조동급창해불량반응발생솔,시험조현저저우대조조( P<0.05);2조환자자주호흡회복시간、발제기관도관시간급소성시간차별무통계학의의( P>0.05)。결론 DEX용우복부수술환자가현저증강전신마취효과,강저소성기불량반응발생솔。
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine ( DEX ) on patients undergoing abdominal surgery who received general anesthesia and on quality of post -surgery recovery.Methods Ninety-one patients who were planed for abdominal surgery with general anesthesia were randomly divided into treatment group ( n=44 ) and control group ( n=47 ) with random number table.Patients in control group were given saline 15 mL 15 min prior general anesthesia.And patients in treatment group were given DEX 0.5 μg· kg -1 and then 0.25 μg· kg -1 · h-1 in the procedure of operation.Spontaneous breath-ing, awaking time, extubation time and side effects were compared be-tween two groups.Results The VRS analgesic score in treatment group was much lower than that in control ( P<0.05 ).The incidence rate of agitation bucking in treatment group was much lower than that in control group ( P<0.05 ).But spontaneous breathing time , awaking time and extubation time showed no statistical difference between the two groups ( P>0.05).Conclusion DEX can significantly reduce the risk of de-veloping agitation , bucking and improve the general anesthesia efficacy in patients receiving abdominal surgery who underwent general anesthesia.