中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2013年
22期
2631-2634
,共4页
尤红%刘虹%崔卫华%杨林霖%辛博%刘小玉%马香蕊
尤紅%劉虹%崔衛華%楊林霖%辛博%劉小玉%馬香蕊
우홍%류홍%최위화%양림림%신박%류소옥%마향예
抑郁症%全程康复护理%心理状态%依从性
抑鬱癥%全程康複護理%心理狀態%依從性
억욱증%전정강복호리%심리상태%의종성
Depression%Whole-process rehabilitation nursing%Psychological states%Adherence
目的 探讨全程康复护理对抑郁症患者治疗依从性的影响.方法 对80例住院抑郁症患者按照随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组各40例.对照组患者进行常规的治疗护理,观察组患者在常规的治疗护理基础上实施全程康复护理,比较两组患者干预前后抑郁、焦虑得分及治疗依从性.结果 治疗前两组患者的汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组干预4,8周后HAMD得分为(13.00±3.13),(6.15 ±2.50)分,HAMA得分分别为(9.20±2.31),(4.80±2.12)分;对照组干预4,8周后HAMD得分分别为(15.05 ±2.89),(8.00±2.73)分,HAMA得分分别为(11.20±2.55),(6.60±1.47)分,两组HAMD及HAMA得分比较差异有统计学意义(t值分别为-2.60,-3.13,-2.15,-2.23;P<0.05).出院1年后,两组患者在社会适应、遵嘱服药、定期复查等方面依从性比较差异有统计学意义(Z值分别为-12.71,-2.44,-3.33;P<0.05).结论 全程康复护理有利于改善患者的焦虑、抑郁情绪,提高患者对治疗的依从性,为抑郁症患者全面康复提供依据.
目的 探討全程康複護理對抑鬱癥患者治療依從性的影響.方法 對80例住院抑鬱癥患者按照隨機數字錶法分為觀察組和對照組各40例.對照組患者進行常規的治療護理,觀察組患者在常規的治療護理基礎上實施全程康複護理,比較兩組患者榦預前後抑鬱、焦慮得分及治療依從性.結果 治療前兩組患者的漢密爾頓抑鬱量錶(HAMD)、漢密爾頓焦慮量錶(HAMA)評分比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);觀察組榦預4,8週後HAMD得分為(13.00±3.13),(6.15 ±2.50)分,HAMA得分分彆為(9.20±2.31),(4.80±2.12)分;對照組榦預4,8週後HAMD得分分彆為(15.05 ±2.89),(8.00±2.73)分,HAMA得分分彆為(11.20±2.55),(6.60±1.47)分,兩組HAMD及HAMA得分比較差異有統計學意義(t值分彆為-2.60,-3.13,-2.15,-2.23;P<0.05).齣院1年後,兩組患者在社會適應、遵囑服藥、定期複查等方麵依從性比較差異有統計學意義(Z值分彆為-12.71,-2.44,-3.33;P<0.05).結論 全程康複護理有利于改善患者的焦慮、抑鬱情緒,提高患者對治療的依從性,為抑鬱癥患者全麵康複提供依據.
목적 탐토전정강복호리대억욱증환자치료의종성적영향.방법 대80례주원억욱증환자안조수궤수자표법분위관찰조화대조조각40례.대조조환자진행상규적치료호리,관찰조환자재상규적치료호리기출상실시전정강복호리,비교량조환자간예전후억욱、초필득분급치료의종성.결과 치료전량조환자적한밀이돈억욱량표(HAMD)、한밀이돈초필량표(HAMA)평분비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);관찰조간예4,8주후HAMD득분위(13.00±3.13),(6.15 ±2.50)분,HAMA득분분별위(9.20±2.31),(4.80±2.12)분;대조조간예4,8주후HAMD득분분별위(15.05 ±2.89),(8.00±2.73)분,HAMA득분분별위(11.20±2.55),(6.60±1.47)분,량조HAMD급HAMA득분비교차이유통계학의의(t치분별위-2.60,-3.13,-2.15,-2.23;P<0.05).출원1년후,량조환자재사회괄응、준촉복약、정기복사등방면의종성비교차이유통계학의의(Z치분별위-12.71,-2.44,-3.33;P<0.05).결론 전정강복호리유리우개선환자적초필、억욱정서,제고환자대치료적의종성,위억욱증환자전면강복제공의거.
Objective To explore the effect of whole-process rehabilitation nursing on treatment adherence in patients with depression.Methods A total of 80 hospitalized patients with depression were randomly divided into two groups according to random number method:the experimental group (n =40) with whole-process rehabilitation nursing and the control group (n =40) with routine nursing.The depression and anxiety scores and treatment adherence between the two groups were compared before and after nursing intervention.Results Before nursing intervention,Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) and Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) scores were not statistically significant between two groups (P > 0.05).Four and eight weeks after nursing intervention,HAMD scores were (13.00 ± 3.13) and (6.15 ± 2.50) and HAMA scores were (9.20 ± 2.31) and (4.80 ± 2.12) in the experimental group,respectively; and HAM D scores were (15.05 ±2.89) and (8.00 ± 2.73) and HAMA scores were (11.20 ± 2.55) and (6.60 ± 1.47) in the control group,respectively; HAMD and HAMA scores were statistically significantly different between the two groups (t =-2.60,-3.13,-2.15,-2.23,respectively; P < 0.05).One year of discharge,there were statistically significant differences between the two groups at social adaptation,medication adherence,regular reexamination (Z =-12.71,-2.44,-3.33,respectively; P < 0.05).Conclusions The whole-process rehabilitation nursing can help to improve the patient's anxiety and depression and to increase treatment adherence,in order to provide a theoretical basis for comprehensive rehabilitation of patients with depression.