CAJ | 학술논문

忠诚协议的效力问题目前仍有争议，各地法院的司法立场也各不相同，有的法院作出了支持判决，有的法院则不予受理或驳回请求。局限在法律之债的范畴内探讨忠诚协议的效力，不论是有效说还是无效说，支持还是不支持，都将陷入“于法无据”和“无法司法”的窘境。将忠诚协议所生之债定位为自然之债不仅可以摆脱这一窘境，而且可以为忠诚协议找到一种符合法律理性的处置。忠诚协议不能依《合同法》之规定产生合同之债，也不能依《婚姻法》之规定产生与有名身份协议相同的法律之债，忠诚协议所生之债只能是自然之债。基于家事领域司法谦抑的考虑，法院有必要克制在婚姻家庭事务上拓展司法疆域的冲动，将因忠诚协议引发的纠纷排除在受案和审理范围之外。
충성협의적효력문제목전잉유쟁의，각지법원적사법립장야각불상동，유적법원작출료지지판결，유적법원칙불여수리혹박회청구。국한재법률지채적범주내탐토충성협의적효력，불론시유효설환시무효설，지지환시불지지，도장함입“우법무거”화“무법사법”적군경。장충성협의소생지채정위위자연지채불부가이파탈저일군경，이차가이위충성협의조도일충부합법률이성적처치。충성협의불능의《합동법》지규정산생합동지채，야불능의《혼인법》지규정산생여유명신빈협의상동적법률지채，충성협의소생지채지능시자연지채。기우가사영역사법겸억적고필，법원유필요극제재혼인가정사무상탁전사법강역적충동，장인충성협의인발적규분배제재수안화심리범위지외。
The validity of loyalty agreement is controversial and courts in different regions have different viewpoints on this issue . Some courts make judgments to support the agreement but others dismiss the cases or overrule the claims .Whether it is valid or not, supportive or not , if the validity of loyalty agreement is limited to legal obligation in our discussion , a loyalty agreement will have no legal basis and thus can't be acted through judicial channels .The way to overcome this dilemma is to see loyalty from the perspective of natural obligation which will also meet the needs for legal reason .A loyalty agreement can neither produce contrac-tual obligation according to contract law nor produce legal obligation such as nominate identity protocol according to marriage law . A loyalty agreement can only lead to natural obligation .In consideration of judicial humility on family affairs ,the courts should re-strain themselves and it's better to exclude the disputes of loyalty agreement from jurisdiction .