CAJ | 학술논문

本文梳理了近年来东南亚学者关于《联合国海洋法公约》中岩礁问题的相应观点，指出在讨论和辨析南海岛礁创设相关海域的权利的过程中，一些研究者在某种程度上展现出了具有东南亚特色的“岩礁问题”学术解读方式，即试图通过绕开岛礁的法律属性认定问题或通过对岩礁概念进行狭义解释来尽可能地限制中国在南海地区的海域主张。而国家实践表明，东南亚地区的南海争端国在岩礁条款解释问题上所持的立场并非“铁板一块”，也不存在有效证据表明中国对岩礁问题持“双重标准”。实际上，在整体上保持战略性模糊、在个案上保持相对化清晰，成为当前南海争端国解释和处理岩礁问题时的普遍选择。从长远看，“一事一议”、“先易后难”是解决南海岛礁法律属性争议的务实做法。
본문소리료근년래동남아학자관우《연합국해양법공약》중암초문제적상응관점，지출재토론화변석남해도초창설상관해역적권리적과정중，일사연구자재모충정도상전현출료구유동남아특색적“암초문제”학술해독방식，즉시도통과요개도초적법률속성인정문제혹통과대암초개념진행협의해석래진가능지한제중국재남해지구적해역주장。이국가실천표명，동남아지구적남해쟁단국재암초조관해석문제상소지적립장병비“철판일괴”，야불존재유효증거표명중국대암초문제지“쌍중표준”。실제상，재정체상보지전략성모호、재개안상보지상대화청석，성위당전남해쟁단국해석화처리암초문제시적보편선택。종장원간，“일사일의”、“선역후난”시해결남해도초법률속성쟁의적무실주법。
This paper makes an analysis of some Southeast Asian scholars' views on the rock issue under the UN-CLOS in recent years, and finds a Southeast Asian Way of interpreting UNCLOS 121 (3). And the regional state practice indicates that there is no a unified position of Southeast Asian states and no valid evidence that China has adopted a “double-standard” policy in this field. A mix of macro-level strategic ambiguity and micro-level relative clarity on the issue has become a popular choice in reality. In the long run, it may be a pragmatic approach to as-sess the maritime features in the South China Sea one by one and, especially, to assess those easily-identified fea-tures first to clarify their legal attributes under the UNCLOS.