CAJ | 학술논문

目的：比较腹股沟疝传统疝修补与无张力疝修补术两种术式的临床应用效果。方法：回顾性分析行传统疝修补(传统组，40例)或无张力疝修补术（无张力组，64例）手术的104例腹股沟患者临床资料。结果：无张力组手术时间、下床活动时间、住院时间短于传统组（P<0.05或P<0.001）；术后并发症发生率、复发率低于传统组（P<0.05）；住院费用高于传统组（P<0.05）。结论：腹股沟疝无张力疝修补术相比较传统疝修补术，手术操作简单、术后恢复快、并发症少、复发率低，具有明显的优势。
목적：비교복고구산전통산수보여무장력산수보술량충술식적림상응용효과。방법：회고성분석행전통산수보(전통조，40례)혹무장력산수보술（무장력조，64례）수술적104례복고구환자림상자료。결과：무장력조수술시간、하상활동시간、주원시간단우전통조（P<0.05혹P<0.001）；술후병발증발생솔、복발솔저우전통조（P<0.05）；주원비용고우전통조（P<0.05）。결론：복고구산무장력산수보술상비교전통산수보술，수술조작간단、술후회복쾌、병발증소、복발솔저，구유명현적우세。
Objective:To compare results following traditional herniorrhaphy and tension-free terniorrhaphy. Methods:The clinical data of 104 cases of inguinal hernia who underwent traditional herniorrhaphy (traditional group, 40 cases) or tension-free terniorrhaphy (tension-free group, 64 cases)were retrospectively analyzed. Results:The op-eration time, the time to get out of bed and inpatient days in tension-free group were shorter than those in traditional group (P<0.05 or P<0.01).Less complications, lower recurrence rate and higher expenses in tension-free group than those in traditional group(P<0.01).Conclusion:In the case of inguinal hernia, tension-free herniorrhaphy was superior to traditional herniorrhaphy with advantages of simple operation, rapid postoperative recovery, less complications and lower recurrence rate.