国际口腔医学杂志
國際口腔醫學雜誌
국제구강의학잡지
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STOMATOLOGY
2014年
4期
409-411
,共3页
尹鸿民%浩志超%徐佳蕊%高久瑜
尹鴻民%浩誌超%徐佳蕊%高久瑜
윤홍민%호지초%서가예%고구유
磁性附着体%固位力%磁通量
磁性附著體%固位力%磁通量
자성부착체%고위력%자통량
magnetic attachment%retentive force%magnetic flux
目的:研究反复取戴对磁性附着体固位力和磁通量的影响及其相关性。方法以5对磁性附着体为研究对象,模拟临床义齿取戴的拉脱—复位运动,在取戴前,取戴2500、5000次和10000次后对磁性附着体的固位力进行测量;在磁体和衔铁精确对位组成标准的闭合磁路的前提下,分别选取3个位点(磁体上表面P1、衔铁下表面P2和侧方P3)进行磁通量的测定。结果5对磁性附着体在取戴前的固位力为(3.361±0.137)N;反复取戴2500、5000次和10000次后固位力分别下降到(3.109±0.160)、(2.666±0.195)和(2.224±0.231)N。反复取戴前后3个位点的磁通量均有所增加,但其差异无统计学意义,同时固位力和磁通量之间呈线性变化趋势。结论反复取戴磁性附着体会导致其固位力下降,而对磁通量没有显著的影响。
目的:研究反複取戴對磁性附著體固位力和磁通量的影響及其相關性。方法以5對磁性附著體為研究對象,模擬臨床義齒取戴的拉脫—複位運動,在取戴前,取戴2500、5000次和10000次後對磁性附著體的固位力進行測量;在磁體和銜鐵精確對位組成標準的閉閤磁路的前提下,分彆選取3箇位點(磁體上錶麵P1、銜鐵下錶麵P2和側方P3)進行磁通量的測定。結果5對磁性附著體在取戴前的固位力為(3.361±0.137)N;反複取戴2500、5000次和10000次後固位力分彆下降到(3.109±0.160)、(2.666±0.195)和(2.224±0.231)N。反複取戴前後3箇位點的磁通量均有所增加,但其差異無統計學意義,同時固位力和磁通量之間呈線性變化趨勢。結論反複取戴磁性附著體會導緻其固位力下降,而對磁通量沒有顯著的影響。
목적:연구반복취대대자성부착체고위력화자통량적영향급기상관성。방법이5대자성부착체위연구대상,모의림상의치취대적랍탈—복위운동,재취대전,취대2500、5000차화10000차후대자성부착체적고위력진행측량;재자체화함철정학대위조성표준적폐합자로적전제하,분별선취3개위점(자체상표면P1、함철하표면P2화측방P3)진행자통량적측정。결과5대자성부착체재취대전적고위력위(3.361±0.137)N;반복취대2500、5000차화10000차후고위력분별하강도(3.109±0.160)、(2.666±0.195)화(2.224±0.231)N。반복취대전후3개위점적자통량균유소증가,단기차이무통계학의의,동시고위력화자통량지간정선성변화추세。결론반복취대자성부착체회도치기고위력하강,이대자통량몰유현저적영향。
Objective??This?study?aims?to?evaluate?the?retentive?force?and?magnetic?flux?of?magnetic?attachments?after?repeated?insertion–removal?cycles.?The?correlation?of?retentive?force?and?magnetic?flux?was?also?observed.?Methods???A?Magfit?EX600W(n=5)?was?selected?as?retentive?device?for?this?study.?The?retentive?force?of?the?magnetic?attachments?after?2?500,?5?000,?and?10?000?times?of?insertion–removal?cycles?was?obtained?through?a?universal?testing?machine.?Magnetic?fluxes?at?three?positions?(P1,?upper?surface?of?the?magnet;?P2,?lower?surface?of?the?keeper;?and?P3,?lateral?side?of?the?magnetic?attachment?set)?were?measured?using?a?Gauss?meter.?Results???The?initial?retentive?force?of?the?Magfit?EX600W?attachment?was(3.361±0.137)?N.?The?retentive?force?significantly?decreased?to?(3.109±0.160)?N,?(2.666±0.195)?N,?and?(2.224±0.231)?N?after?2?500,?5?000,?and?10?000?refitting?cycles,?respectively.?However,?no?significant?difference?was?observed?among?the?increased?magnetic?flux?at?the?three?positions?after?refitting?cycles.?Moreover,?the?retentive?force?and?maximum?magnetic?flux?leakage?showed?strong?negative?correlation.?Conclusion???The?retentive?force?decreased?because?of?the?refitting?cycles.?However,?insertion–removal?cycles?had?no?significant?effect?on?magnetic?flux.