医学影像学杂志
醫學影像學雜誌
의학영상학잡지
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING
2014年
7期
1228-1231
,共4页
髂股静脉血栓形成%导管接触性溶栓治疗
髂股靜脈血栓形成%導管接觸性溶栓治療
가고정맥혈전형성%도관접촉성용전치료
Catheter-directed thrombolysis%Lliofemoral deep vein thrombosis
目的:探讨导管接触性溶栓治疗急性期髂股静脉血栓形成的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析我院2008年~2012年期间86例急性期髂股静脉血栓形成患者的临床资料,以下肢周径差变化、静脉通畅度评分、静脉通畅率及深静脉血栓后综合征(PTS)发生率评估治疗效果;以出血并发症、肺栓塞等发生率评估其安全性。结果导管直接溶栓(CDT )组治疗前、后大腿和小腿的周径差显著高于单纯静脉溶栓治疗(TPVT )组( P <0.05)。治疗前后CDT组静脉通畅度率显著高于TPVT组( P <0.05);CDT组Villalta评分、PTS及并发症发生率显著低于 TPVT 组( P >0.05)。结论导管接触性溶栓治疗急性期髂股静脉血栓形成是一种安全有效的治疗方法。
目的:探討導管接觸性溶栓治療急性期髂股靜脈血栓形成的臨床療效。方法迴顧性分析我院2008年~2012年期間86例急性期髂股靜脈血栓形成患者的臨床資料,以下肢週徑差變化、靜脈通暢度評分、靜脈通暢率及深靜脈血栓後綜閤徵(PTS)髮生率評估治療效果;以齣血併髮癥、肺栓塞等髮生率評估其安全性。結果導管直接溶栓(CDT )組治療前、後大腿和小腿的週徑差顯著高于單純靜脈溶栓治療(TPVT )組( P <0.05)。治療前後CDT組靜脈通暢度率顯著高于TPVT組( P <0.05);CDT組Villalta評分、PTS及併髮癥髮生率顯著低于 TPVT 組( P >0.05)。結論導管接觸性溶栓治療急性期髂股靜脈血栓形成是一種安全有效的治療方法。
목적:탐토도관접촉성용전치료급성기가고정맥혈전형성적림상료효。방법회고성분석아원2008년~2012년기간86례급성기가고정맥혈전형성환자적림상자료,이하지주경차변화、정맥통창도평분、정맥통창솔급심정맥혈전후종합정(PTS)발생솔평고치료효과;이출혈병발증、폐전새등발생솔평고기안전성。결과도관직접용전(CDT )조치료전、후대퇴화소퇴적주경차현저고우단순정맥용전치료(TPVT )조( P <0.05)。치료전후CDT조정맥통창도솔현저고우TPVT조( P <0.05);CDT조Villalta평분、PTS급병발증발생솔현저저우 TPVT 조( P >0.05)。결론도관접촉성용전치료급성기가고정맥혈전형성시일충안전유효적치료방법。
Objective To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT ) approach in treatment for acute iliofemoral vein thrombosis (IFVT ) of lower limbs .Methods A retrospective analysis of clinical data was made in 86 patients with acute IFVT from 2008 to 2012 who underwent CDT and TPVT in our hospital .Fifty patients underwent CDT and 36 patients TPVT .Before and after treatment ,the circumference of both the diseased leg and the un-involved leg ,venous patency rates and the incidence of Post-thrombotic Syndrome (PTS) were measured and calculated . Results The circumference difference of leg or upper leg before and after treatment of CDT group was significantly greater than that in the TPVT group ( P <0 .05) .The rate of venous patency was 65 .0% in TDT group ,and 49 .0% in TPVT group ,respectively .The differences of venous patency rate between these two groups were statistically significant ( P <0.05) .There was a significant difference of Villalta score and incidence of PTS between CDT and TPVT groups ( P <0.05) .CDT can reduce dose of urokinase ,shorten the course of disease .There was no significant difference of complica-tion between two groups .Conclusion Catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute iliofemoral vein thrombosis is a safe and ef-fective treatment .