CAJ | 학술논문

通过比较研究国内职业卫生限值标准(GBZ 2.1-2007、GBZ/T 160.1~160.85)，结合文献查阅，对研究结果进行分析讨论。GBZ 2.1-2007中被职业卫生检测与评价机构经常使用的限值标准仅50种左右，尚有94种有害因素无相应的标准检测方法；GBZ/T 160.1~160.85中尚有65种有害因素在GBZ 2.1-2007中无相应的职业接触限值。现行职业卫生限值标准在实际应用过程中存在不足，建议职业卫生标准工作人员及相关科研机构进行深入研究，对职业接触限值或标准检测方法进行修订与完善。
통과비교연구국내직업위생한치표준(GBZ 2.1-2007、GBZ/T 160.1~160.85)，결합문헌사열，대연구결과진행분석토론。GBZ 2.1-2007중피직업위생검측여평개궤구경상사용적한치표준부50충좌우，상유94충유해인소무상응적표준검측방법；GBZ/T 160.1~160.85중상유65충유해인소재GBZ 2.1-2007중무상응적직업접촉한치。현행직업위생한치표준재실제응용과정중존재불족，건의직업위생표준공작인원급상관과연궤구진행심입연구，대직업접촉한치혹표준검측방법진행수정여완선。
To provide some reference information for the professional staff to establish the national occupational health standards and occupational health examination and evaluation institutions, the application of occupational exposure limits(OELs) for hazardous agents in the workplace Part 1:Chemical hazardous agents (GBZ 2.1-2007) was analyzed and evaluated. The results were analyzed by comparing GBZ 2.1-2007 with methods for determination of toxic substances in the air of workplace (GBZ/T 160.1~160.85) and consulting literature. There were only about 50 kinds OELs of GBZ 2.1-2007 used by occupational health examination and evaluation institutions, and about 94 kinds toxic substances with no standard method. There were 65 kind toxic substances in GBZ/T 160.1~160.85 with no OELs in GBZ 2.1-2007. There were some shortcomings though the process of practical application of GBZ 2.1-2007, so more scientific research about the national OELs and standard method should be done and revised and improved.