现代检验医学杂志
現代檢驗醫學雜誌
현대검험의학잡지
JOURNAL OF MODERN LABORATORY MEDICINE
2014年
5期
42-45
,共4页
周文宾%谢波%陆红%彭明婷%吴际%成斐
週文賓%謝波%陸紅%彭明婷%吳際%成斐
주문빈%사파%륙홍%팽명정%오제%성비
D-二聚体%参考区间%验证
D-二聚體%參攷區間%驗證
D-이취체%삼고구간%험증
D-dimer%reference interval%verification
目的:对D-二聚体定量检测的参考区间进行验证,并分析年龄和性别因素对参考区间的影响。方法明确参考个体入组标准,招募参考个体男性60例,女63例,按年龄分为3组:20~39岁组(男女各20名),40~59岁组(男性20名,女性23名),≥60岁组(男女各20名)。采集参考个体枸橼酸钠抗凝静脉血,分别使用三种不同品牌的血液凝固分析仪及配套试剂检测D-二聚体浓度水平。参照美国临床和实验室标准协会(clinical and laboratory standards institute,CLSI)C28-A3文件,对试剂厂商提供的D-二聚体参考区间进行验证,并采用非参数统计比较不同年龄和性别组间的差异。结果对于40岁以下健康人群,三种检测系统的参考区间均验证通过;对于40岁以上健康人群,A检测系统≥60岁组的验证结果未通过,C检测系统40~59岁组的验证结果未通过。各检测系统不同年龄组的检测结果比较显示D-二聚体浓度随年龄增长呈升高趋势,20~39岁年龄组与40~59岁组、20~39岁年龄组与≥60岁年龄组的 D-二聚体浓度水平的差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。各检测系统20~39岁组及40~59岁组男女间 D-二聚体浓度水平的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),而≥60岁年龄组男女间D-二聚体浓度水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 D-二聚体浓度水平与年龄和性别有关。对于40岁以下健康人群,三种检测系统的参考区间均通过验证,可直接采用;而对于40岁以上健康人群,部分检测系统的参考区间未通过验证,实验室应查找原因,必要时单独设置参考区间。
目的:對D-二聚體定量檢測的參攷區間進行驗證,併分析年齡和性彆因素對參攷區間的影響。方法明確參攷箇體入組標準,招募參攷箇體男性60例,女63例,按年齡分為3組:20~39歲組(男女各20名),40~59歲組(男性20名,女性23名),≥60歲組(男女各20名)。採集參攷箇體枸櫞痠鈉抗凝靜脈血,分彆使用三種不同品牌的血液凝固分析儀及配套試劑檢測D-二聚體濃度水平。參照美國臨床和實驗室標準協會(clinical and laboratory standards institute,CLSI)C28-A3文件,對試劑廠商提供的D-二聚體參攷區間進行驗證,併採用非參數統計比較不同年齡和性彆組間的差異。結果對于40歲以下健康人群,三種檢測繫統的參攷區間均驗證通過;對于40歲以上健康人群,A檢測繫統≥60歲組的驗證結果未通過,C檢測繫統40~59歲組的驗證結果未通過。各檢測繫統不同年齡組的檢測結果比較顯示D-二聚體濃度隨年齡增長呈升高趨勢,20~39歲年齡組與40~59歲組、20~39歲年齡組與≥60歲年齡組的 D-二聚體濃度水平的差異均具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。各檢測繫統20~39歲組及40~59歲組男女間 D-二聚體濃度水平的差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05),而≥60歲年齡組男女間D-二聚體濃度水平差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論 D-二聚體濃度水平與年齡和性彆有關。對于40歲以下健康人群,三種檢測繫統的參攷區間均通過驗證,可直接採用;而對于40歲以上健康人群,部分檢測繫統的參攷區間未通過驗證,實驗室應查找原因,必要時單獨設置參攷區間。
목적:대D-이취체정량검측적삼고구간진행험증,병분석년령화성별인소대삼고구간적영향。방법명학삼고개체입조표준,초모삼고개체남성60례,녀63례,안년령분위3조:20~39세조(남녀각20명),40~59세조(남성20명,녀성23명),≥60세조(남녀각20명)。채집삼고개체구연산납항응정맥혈,분별사용삼충불동품패적혈액응고분석의급배투시제검측D-이취체농도수평。삼조미국림상화실험실표준협회(clinical and laboratory standards institute,CLSI)C28-A3문건,대시제엄상제공적D-이취체삼고구간진행험증,병채용비삼수통계비교불동년령화성별조간적차이。결과대우40세이하건강인군,삼충검측계통적삼고구간균험증통과;대우40세이상건강인군,A검측계통≥60세조적험증결과미통과,C검측계통40~59세조적험증결과미통과。각검측계통불동년령조적검측결과비교현시D-이취체농도수년령증장정승고추세,20~39세년령조여40~59세조、20~39세년령조여≥60세년령조적 D-이취체농도수평적차이균구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。각검측계통20~39세조급40~59세조남녀간 D-이취체농도수평적차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05),이≥60세년령조남녀간D-이취체농도수평차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론 D-이취체농도수평여년령화성별유관。대우40세이하건강인군,삼충검측계통적삼고구간균통과험증,가직접채용;이대우40세이상건강인군,부분검측계통적삼고구간미통과험증,실험실응사조원인,필요시단독설치삼고구간。
Objective To verify the reference interval for D-dimer assay and analyze the influence of age and gender on the ref-erence interval.Methods Inclusion criteria for reference individuals were established.60 healthy males and 63 females were enrolled and divided to three groups by age,including 20 to 39 years old group (20 males and 20 females),40 to 59 years old group (20 males and 23 females)and above 60 years old group (20 males and 20 females).Blood samples were drawn in cit-rate sodium anticoagulated tubes and D-dimer concentration was determined by three different coagulation analyzers using o-riginal reagents.According to CLSI guideline C-28-A3,the reference interval for each measurement system from reagent manufacturer was verified and the difference of D-dimer concentration between different age-group and sex-group was ana-lyzed using non-parameters tests.Results All reference intervals were verified for people under age 40,while one reference interval cannot be verified for people from 40 to 59 years old as same as one for people above 60 years old.D-dimer concen-tration increased with age and there was significantly different between 20~39 years old group and 40~59 years old group or above 60 years old group(P<0.05).There was only a significant difference between sex-group for people under age 60(P<0.05).Conclusion D-dimer concentration was associated with age and sex.For people under age 40,the reference inter-val from reagent manufacture can be verified and directly used in laboratory,while for people above age 60,the reference in-terval from reagent manufacture cannot be verified.The cause should be investigated and a new reference interval should be established separately when necessary.