中国全科医学
中國全科醫學
중국전과의학
CHINESE GENERAL PRACTICE
2014年
10期
1115-1118
,共4页
糖尿病,2型%微量清蛋白尿%动态血压
糖尿病,2型%微量清蛋白尿%動態血壓
당뇨병,2형%미량청단백뇨%동태혈압
Diabetes mellitus,type 2%Microalbuminurine%Ambulatory blood pressure
目的:探讨血糖达标且不伴高血压的2型糖尿病患者尿微量清蛋白( MAU)与24 h动态血压之间的关系。方法选取2012年1月-2013年5月在安徽省黄山市中医院内分泌科及代谢科住院及门诊的糖化血红蛋白( HbA1c )<7%且不伴高血压的2型糖尿病患者83例,按照尿MAU水平分为A组( MAU<30 mg/g,37例)和B组(MAU≥30 mg/g,46例),对两组患者的一般资料及动态血压指标进行分析比较。结果(1) B组患者血肌酐值高于A组〔(76.1±14.6)μmol/L 比(67.8±11.9)μmol/L 〕,但肾小球滤过率低于A组〔(73.0±13.6) ml/min比(79.0±11.4) ml/min〕,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);(2) B组24 h平均收缩压〔(128.9±6.2) mm Hg比(122.2±7.2) mm Hg〕、夜间平均收缩压〔(128.9±12.9) mm Hg比(113.8±10.0) mm Hg 〕、夜间平均舒张压〔(78.0±8.6) mm Hg比(69.2±8.3) mm Hg〕、白昼收缩压负荷值〔(15.2±10.8)%比(9.8±7.5)%〕、夜间收缩压负荷值〔(54.5±34.3)%比(13.1±9.4)%〕、夜间舒张压负荷值〔(42.9±32.6)%比(9.6±8.7)%〕、夜间收缩压变异〔(11.2±4.4)比(10.9±4.3)〕及血压昼夜节律消失率(82.6%比37.8%)高于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);(3)多元逐步Logistic回归分析显示,年龄(β=0.097)、病程(β=0.127)、夜间收缩压负荷值(β=0.068)、夜间舒张压负荷值(β=0.077)及夜间收缩压变异(β=-0.229)是MAU的独立预测因子。结论对血糖达标且不伴高血压的2型糖尿病患者,24 h动态血压监测尤其是夜间血压变化对早期肾损伤具有预测价值。
目的:探討血糖達標且不伴高血壓的2型糖尿病患者尿微量清蛋白( MAU)與24 h動態血壓之間的關繫。方法選取2012年1月-2013年5月在安徽省黃山市中醫院內分泌科及代謝科住院及門診的糖化血紅蛋白( HbA1c )<7%且不伴高血壓的2型糖尿病患者83例,按照尿MAU水平分為A組( MAU<30 mg/g,37例)和B組(MAU≥30 mg/g,46例),對兩組患者的一般資料及動態血壓指標進行分析比較。結果(1) B組患者血肌酐值高于A組〔(76.1±14.6)μmol/L 比(67.8±11.9)μmol/L 〕,但腎小毬濾過率低于A組〔(73.0±13.6) ml/min比(79.0±11.4) ml/min〕,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);(2) B組24 h平均收縮壓〔(128.9±6.2) mm Hg比(122.2±7.2) mm Hg〕、夜間平均收縮壓〔(128.9±12.9) mm Hg比(113.8±10.0) mm Hg 〕、夜間平均舒張壓〔(78.0±8.6) mm Hg比(69.2±8.3) mm Hg〕、白晝收縮壓負荷值〔(15.2±10.8)%比(9.8±7.5)%〕、夜間收縮壓負荷值〔(54.5±34.3)%比(13.1±9.4)%〕、夜間舒張壓負荷值〔(42.9±32.6)%比(9.6±8.7)%〕、夜間收縮壓變異〔(11.2±4.4)比(10.9±4.3)〕及血壓晝夜節律消失率(82.6%比37.8%)高于A組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);(3)多元逐步Logistic迴歸分析顯示,年齡(β=0.097)、病程(β=0.127)、夜間收縮壓負荷值(β=0.068)、夜間舒張壓負荷值(β=0.077)及夜間收縮壓變異(β=-0.229)是MAU的獨立預測因子。結論對血糖達標且不伴高血壓的2型糖尿病患者,24 h動態血壓鑑測尤其是夜間血壓變化對早期腎損傷具有預測價值。
목적:탐토혈당체표차불반고혈압적2형당뇨병환자뇨미량청단백( MAU)여24 h동태혈압지간적관계。방법선취2012년1월-2013년5월재안휘성황산시중의원내분비과급대사과주원급문진적당화혈홍단백( HbA1c )<7%차불반고혈압적2형당뇨병환자83례,안조뇨MAU수평분위A조( MAU<30 mg/g,37례)화B조(MAU≥30 mg/g,46례),대량조환자적일반자료급동태혈압지표진행분석비교。결과(1) B조환자혈기항치고우A조〔(76.1±14.6)μmol/L 비(67.8±11.9)μmol/L 〕,단신소구려과솔저우A조〔(73.0±13.6) ml/min비(79.0±11.4) ml/min〕,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);(2) B조24 h평균수축압〔(128.9±6.2) mm Hg비(122.2±7.2) mm Hg〕、야간평균수축압〔(128.9±12.9) mm Hg비(113.8±10.0) mm Hg 〕、야간평균서장압〔(78.0±8.6) mm Hg비(69.2±8.3) mm Hg〕、백주수축압부하치〔(15.2±10.8)%비(9.8±7.5)%〕、야간수축압부하치〔(54.5±34.3)%비(13.1±9.4)%〕、야간서장압부하치〔(42.9±32.6)%비(9.6±8.7)%〕、야간수축압변이〔(11.2±4.4)비(10.9±4.3)〕급혈압주야절률소실솔(82.6%비37.8%)고우A조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);(3)다원축보Logistic회귀분석현시,년령(β=0.097)、병정(β=0.127)、야간수축압부하치(β=0.068)、야간서장압부하치(β=0.077)급야간수축압변이(β=-0.229)시MAU적독립예측인자。결론대혈당체표차불반고혈압적2형당뇨병환자,24 h동태혈압감측우기시야간혈압변화대조기신손상구유예측개치。
Objective To investigate the relationship between microalbuminurine ( MAU) and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure ( 24 h -ABP ) in type 2 diabetes patients with targeted blood glucose levels but no high blood pressure.MethodsMedical records of 83 type 2 diabetes patients with glycated hemoglobin ( HbA1c ) <7% and no high blood pressure who were seeking treatment in Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism of Huangshan City ′s Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were reviewed.Data on the demographic variables and 24h-ABP monitoring readings were stratified by the MAU concentration and accordingly analyzed.Results Plasma levels of creatine were significantly higher 〔 ( 76.1 ±14.6 )μmol/L vs.(67.8 ±11.9) μmol/L, P<0.01〕 but the estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly lower 〔 (73.0 ± 13.6) ml/min vs.(79.0 ±11.4) ml/min, P<0.05〕 in patients with MAU≥30 mg/g than patients with MAU<30 mg/g.On average, the 24 h systolic blood pressure (BP) 〔 (128.9 ±6.2) mm Hg vs.(122.2 ±7.2) mm Hg, P<0.01〕, nocturnal systolic BP 〔(128.9 ±12.9) mm Hg vs.(113.8 ±10.0) mm Hg, P<0.01〕, nocturnal diastolic BP 〔(78.0 ±8.6) mm Hg vs.(69.2 ±8.3) mm Hg, P<0.01〕, daytime systolic BP load 〔(15.2 ±10.8)%vs.(9.8 ±7.5)%, P<0.05〕, noctur-nal systolic BP load 〔 (54.5 ±34.3)%vs.(13.1 ±9.4)%, P<0.01〕, nocturnal diastolic BP load 〔 (42.9 ±32.6)%vs.(9.6 ±8.7)%, P<0.01〕, standard deviation of nocturnal systolic BP 〔 (11.2 ±4.4) vs.(10.9 ±4.3), P<0.01〕, and disappearance rate of blood pressure circadian rhythm ( 82.6% vs.37.8%, P<0.01 ) were all significantly higher in patients with MAU≥30 mg/L than patients with MAU <30 mg/L.Multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated age (β=0.097 ) , the disease course (β=0.127 ) , nocturnal systolic BP load (β=0.068 ) , nocturnal diastolic BP load (β=0.077 ) , and stand-ard deviation of nocturnal systolic BP (β=-0.229 ) were independent predictors of MAU.Conclusion Ambulatory blood pres-sure monitoring variables , particularly the variation of blood pressure at night , may predict early MAU-related renal damage in type 2 diabetes patients whose blood pressure is not high and whose blood glucose is under an effective control .