CAJ | 학술논문

在西方法律思想研究传统中，自古希腊时代起，就存在着与社会科学研究方法不同的“法律数学思想”传统。近年来，这种以数学理性思维和数学工具为方法论的法律研究在我国方兴未艾。但由于长期以来自然科学和社会科学领域存在着的研究思想和方法的鸿沟，理论界对于这种“法律数学思想”研究还有很大的质疑声，认为这种研究方法背离了法律价值判断的基本属性。从本质上看，这种质疑观点是“科学主义”与“人本主义”之间争论在法律数学思想研究上的具体体现。所以，如何实现“形式理性”与“实质理性”的辩证统一，是开展法律数学研究必须首先解决的关键问题。
재서방법률사상연구전통중，자고희석시대기，취존재착여사회과학연구방법불동적“법률수학사상”전통。근년래，저충이수학이성사유화수학공구위방법론적법률연구재아국방흥미애。단유우장기이래자연과학화사회과학영역존재착적연구사상화방법적홍구，이론계대우저충“법률수학사상”연구환유흔대적질의성，인위저충연구방법배리료법률개치판단적기본속성。종본질상간，저충질의관점시“과학주의”여“인본주의”지간쟁론재법률수학사상연구상적구체체현。소이，여하실현“형식이성”여“실질이성”적변증통일，시개전법률수학연구필수수선해결적관건문제。
In Western traditional research into legal thoughts since ancient Greece onwards,there has been the practice of “legal mathematical ideas”which are different from the methods of social science research.In recent years,this kind of legal study based on mathematical thinking and mathematical tools has gain growing popularity in China.However,due to the long-standing gap of research ideas and methods between natural sciences and social sciences there are a lot of doubt about research into “legal mathematical ideas”.In essence,this doubt is the embodiment of the dispute between “scientism”and “humanism”in the study of legal mathematical ideas.So,how to achieve the dialectical unity between “formal rationality”and “substantive rationality”is the key problem to be solved in order to conduct a study of legal mathematics.