CAJ | 학술논문

通过对我国目前劳动争议处理制度现状及问题的分析，提出了完善我国劳动争议处理制度的设想。我国目前实行“一调一裁二审终审”的劳动争议处理制度，这一制度设立的初衷是希望通过调解和准司法性质的劳动仲裁程序解决一部分争议案件，以节约诉讼成本。但实践中，这种模式非但没有达到设计者的预期，反而弊端凸显。尽管2008年《劳动争议调解仲裁法》中的“一裁终局”制度使部分劳动争议案件得以快速解决，但并未从根本上弥补我国劳动争议处理制度的缺陷。通过论证并结合我国国情提出了“调解前置或裁或审各自终局”的劳动争议处理制度的改革设想。
통과대아국목전노동쟁의처리제도현상급문제적분석，제출료완선아국노동쟁의처리제도적설상。아국목전실행“일조일재이심종심”적노동쟁의처리제도，저일제도설립적초충시희망통과조해화준사법성질적노동중재정서해결일부분쟁의안건，이절약소송성본。단실천중，저충모식비단몰유체도설계자적예기，반이폐단철현。진관2008년《노동쟁의조해중재법》중적“일재종국”제도사부분노동쟁의안건득이쾌속해결，단병미종근본상미보아국노동쟁의처리제도적결함。통과론증병결합아국국정제출료“조해전치혹재혹심각자종국”적노동쟁의처리제도적개혁설상。
With an analysis of the status quo and problems of China’s current labor dispute settlement system, this paper roughs out an idea for improving China’s labor dispute settlement system. China’s current labor dispute settlement system can be characterized by Mediation, Arbitration and Second-instance-being-the-final-instance system, which is taken into account originally for settling a part of labor dispute cases by Mediation and Arbitration (a quasi-judicial procedure) so as to save litigation costs. But in practice, this system not only fails to realize the expectation aim, but also highlights its disadvantages. Although The Arbitration-being-final System in Law of the People’s Republic of China on Mediation and Arbitration of Labor Disputes made parts of labor disputes be resolved quickly, it did not make up for the deficiencies of labor dispute settlement system fundamentally. According to China's situation, this paper discusses and puts forward the reform blueprint of the labor dispute settlement system that includes the pre-litigation mediation procedure should be added as the preceding procedure of litigation and arbitration or trial is final.