中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版)
中華腔鏡外科雜誌(電子版)
중화강경외과잡지(전자판)
CHINESE JOURNAL OF LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY ( ELECTRONIC EDITION)
2014年
1期
53-56
,共4页
梅锋%王淳%徐伟宏%邱凌
梅鋒%王淳%徐偉宏%邱凌
매봉%왕순%서위굉%구릉
电子胆道镜%输尿管硬镜%腹腔镜%胆管结石%手术%分析
電子膽道鏡%輸尿管硬鏡%腹腔鏡%膽管結石%手術%分析
전자담도경%수뇨관경경%복강경%담관결석%수술%분석
Electronic choledochoscope%Ureteroscopic%Laparoscopic%Calculus of bile duct%Operation%Analysis
目的:探讨电子胆道镜与输尿管硬镜在腹腔镜胆管探查取石术(LCBDE)中的优越性。方法常规采用腹腔镜四孔法完成手术,显露并纵向切开胆总管前壁,甲组患者(31例)通过输尿管硬镜探查取石,乙组患者(30例)通过电子胆道镜探查取石,取石后均常规安置T管和腹腔引流管。手术后3个月和1年时进行电话及门诊随访,做出临床观察和评估。观察指标为:手术时间、术中出血量、术后使用镇痛的频率、术后胃肠功能恢复时间、术后住院天数、住院费用、手术并发症(胆管残留结石、胆管损伤、胆漏、胆管狭窄、切口感染)、学习曲线等。将两组数据进行统计学处理和分析。结果甲组中有2例患者改用电子胆道镜取石成功。术中出血量、术后使用镇痛的频率、术后胃肠功能恢复时间、术后住院天数、住院费用、手术并发症(胆管残留结石、胆管损伤、胆漏、胆管狭窄、切口感染)等方面两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。学习曲线、手术时间甲组优于乙组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论严格掌握手术适应证,输尿管硬镜联合腹腔镜治疗胆管结石手术是一种微创、安全有效、简捷的手术方式,值得临床推广应用。必要时联合胆道镜探查取石可提高取石率。
目的:探討電子膽道鏡與輸尿管硬鏡在腹腔鏡膽管探查取石術(LCBDE)中的優越性。方法常規採用腹腔鏡四孔法完成手術,顯露併縱嚮切開膽總管前壁,甲組患者(31例)通過輸尿管硬鏡探查取石,乙組患者(30例)通過電子膽道鏡探查取石,取石後均常規安置T管和腹腔引流管。手術後3箇月和1年時進行電話及門診隨訪,做齣臨床觀察和評估。觀察指標為:手術時間、術中齣血量、術後使用鎮痛的頻率、術後胃腸功能恢複時間、術後住院天數、住院費用、手術併髮癥(膽管殘留結石、膽管損傷、膽漏、膽管狹窄、切口感染)、學習麯線等。將兩組數據進行統計學處理和分析。結果甲組中有2例患者改用電子膽道鏡取石成功。術中齣血量、術後使用鎮痛的頻率、術後胃腸功能恢複時間、術後住院天數、住院費用、手術併髮癥(膽管殘留結石、膽管損傷、膽漏、膽管狹窄、切口感染)等方麵兩組差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。學習麯線、手術時間甲組優于乙組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01)。結論嚴格掌握手術適應證,輸尿管硬鏡聯閤腹腔鏡治療膽管結石手術是一種微創、安全有效、簡捷的手術方式,值得臨床推廣應用。必要時聯閤膽道鏡探查取石可提高取石率。
목적:탐토전자담도경여수뇨관경경재복강경담관탐사취석술(LCBDE)중적우월성。방법상규채용복강경사공법완성수술,현로병종향절개담총관전벽,갑조환자(31례)통과수뇨관경경탐사취석,을조환자(30례)통과전자담도경탐사취석,취석후균상규안치T관화복강인류관。수술후3개월화1년시진행전화급문진수방,주출림상관찰화평고。관찰지표위:수술시간、술중출혈량、술후사용진통적빈솔、술후위장공능회복시간、술후주원천수、주원비용、수술병발증(담관잔류결석、담관손상、담루、담관협착、절구감염)、학습곡선등。장량조수거진행통계학처리화분석。결과갑조중유2례환자개용전자담도경취석성공。술중출혈량、술후사용진통적빈솔、술후위장공능회복시간、술후주원천수、주원비용、수술병발증(담관잔류결석、담관손상、담루、담관협착、절구감염)등방면량조차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。학습곡선、수술시간갑조우우을조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01)。결론엄격장악수술괄응증,수뇨관경경연합복강경치료담관결석수술시일충미창、안전유효、간첩적수술방식,치득림상추엄응용。필요시연합담도경탐사취석가제고취석솔。
Objective Investigate the advantage of apply electronic choledochoscope and ureteroscopic in laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct lithotomy. Methods Finish the operation with routine 4 hole methods. Peritoneal cavity drainage tube and T-tube is also routine procedure.Expose and incision bile duct anterior wall longitudinally.A group (31 cases):finish the operation with ureteroscopic,B group (30 cases):finish the operation with electronic choledochoscope. Assess all case with data showed in 3 months follow up and 1 year follow up through telephone or clinic. Observation indexs include operation time,the amount of intraoperative bleeding,frequency of postoperative analgesia, the recovery time of gastrointestinal function,hospital day,hospitalization expenses,operation complications (retained bile duct stones,bile duct injury,bile leakage,stenosis of bile duct,infection of incisional wound),learning curve etc.Analyse the data with statistical methods. Results 2 cases of A group change to electronic choledochoscope. The difference between two groups,the amount of intraoperative bleeding, frequency of postoperative analgesia, the recovery time of gastrointestinal function, hospitalday,hospitalization expenses, operation complications (retained bile duct stones, bile duct injury, bile leakage,stenosis of bile duct,infection of incisional wound)have no statistical significance (P> 0.05), operation time,learning curve have statistical significance (P< 0.01). Conclusion With strict control of operation indications,apply of ureteroscopic in laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct lithotomy is a minimal invasive,safe and effective,simple methods that worth to popularized and app lied. On occasion innecessity,electronic choledochoscope can enhance the success rate of lithotomy.