中华医学教育杂志
中華醫學教育雜誌
중화의학교육잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION
2014年
1期
88-90
,共3页
周波%时景璞%王海龙%付凌雨%吴晓梅%董卫
週波%時景璞%王海龍%付凌雨%吳曉梅%董衛
주파%시경박%왕해룡%부릉우%오효매%동위
循证医学%教学模式%七年制临床医学专业%教学改革
循證醫學%教學模式%七年製臨床醫學專業%教學改革
순증의학%교학모식%칠년제림상의학전업%교학개혁
Evidence-based medicine%Teaching model%Seven-year program clinical medicine%Teaching reform
目的通过七年制临床医学专业循证医学课程教学模式改革,探索提高学生临床实践和研究能力的循证医学教学模式。方法2010年7月至2012年7月,将中国医科大学2006级和2007级临床医学专业学生在每一个年级内随机分成实验组和对照组。循证医学教学中,实验组采取新教学模式,对照组采用传统的讲授式教学模式,2012年6月集中进行问卷调查以了解循证医学教学效果。结果实验组学生用循证医学思想解决临床问题的实践能力优于对照组学生,两组学生的差异具有统计学意义;两组学生制作证据的研究能力的差异无统计学意义,但实验组学生发表1篇循证医学论文的人数高于对照组。结论新的循证医学教学模式得到学生的认可,提高了学生应用证据解决临床问题的实践能力及制作证据的研究能力,提高了循证医学教学效果。
目的通過七年製臨床醫學專業循證醫學課程教學模式改革,探索提高學生臨床實踐和研究能力的循證醫學教學模式。方法2010年7月至2012年7月,將中國醫科大學2006級和2007級臨床醫學專業學生在每一箇年級內隨機分成實驗組和對照組。循證醫學教學中,實驗組採取新教學模式,對照組採用傳統的講授式教學模式,2012年6月集中進行問捲調查以瞭解循證醫學教學效果。結果實驗組學生用循證醫學思想解決臨床問題的實踐能力優于對照組學生,兩組學生的差異具有統計學意義;兩組學生製作證據的研究能力的差異無統計學意義,但實驗組學生髮錶1篇循證醫學論文的人數高于對照組。結論新的循證醫學教學模式得到學生的認可,提高瞭學生應用證據解決臨床問題的實踐能力及製作證據的研究能力,提高瞭循證醫學教學效果。
목적통과칠년제림상의학전업순증의학과정교학모식개혁,탐색제고학생림상실천화연구능력적순증의학교학모식。방법2010년7월지2012년7월,장중국의과대학2006급화2007급림상의학전업학생재매일개년급내수궤분성실험조화대조조。순증의학교학중,실험조채취신교학모식,대조조채용전통적강수식교학모식,2012년6월집중진행문권조사이료해순증의학교학효과。결과실험조학생용순증의학사상해결림상문제적실천능력우우대조조학생,량조학생적차이구유통계학의의;량조학생제작증거적연구능력적차이무통계학의의,단실험조학생발표1편순증의학논문적인수고우대조조。결론신적순증의학교학모식득도학생적인가,제고료학생응용증거해결림상문제적실천능력급제작증거적연구능력,제고료순증의학교학효과。
Objective To explore the best evidence-based medicine teaching model to enhance students’ clinical practice and research capabilities by conducting a teaching model reform for seven-year program clinical medicine students. Methods From July 2010 to July 2012, seven-year program medical students of Grade 2006 and 2007 were randomly divided into experimental group and control group in each grade. During evidence-based medicine teaching, experimental group accepted new teaching model while control group accepted traditional teaching model. In June 2012, the researched students would be surveyed with questionnaire. Results When the follow-up was finished, there was significant difference between ex-perimental group and control group on enhancing clinical practice capability guided by evidence-based medicine. Though there was no significant difference between experimental group and control group on make evidence, the amount of papers published of experimental group was more than that of control group. Conclusions The survey results showed that evidence-based medicine teaching model reform achieved some success. The abilities of producing and applying evidence of students were enhanced.