影像诊断与介入放射学
影像診斷與介入放射學
영상진단여개입방사학
JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY
2014年
2期
143-146
,共4页
刘长珠%王会敏%曹务腾%练延帮%袁芬%朱攀%周智洋
劉長珠%王會敏%曹務騰%練延幫%袁芬%硃攀%週智洋
류장주%왕회민%조무등%련연방%원분%주반%주지양
直肠癌%腔内超声%三维超声%体层摄像术,X线计算机%磁共振成像%术前分期
直腸癌%腔內超聲%三維超聲%體層攝像術,X線計算機%磁共振成像%術前分期
직장암%강내초성%삼유초성%체층섭상술,X선계산궤%자공진성상%술전분기
Rectal cancer%Endoluminal ultrasound%Three-dimensional ultrasound%CT%MRI%Preoperative staging
目的:评价经直肠双平面超声联合经直肠三维超声在直肠癌术前分期中的应用价值。方法73例直肠癌患者均行经直肠超声检查(TRUS),其中33例行CT检查,37例行MRI检查,检查后分别依据TRUS、CT、MRI对直肠癌进行T分期及N分期,并与术后病理对照。结果所有患者经手术证实为直肠癌,并获得术后病理分期,术前TRUS、CT、MRI的T分期的准确度分别为68.49%(50/73)、42.42%(14/33)、64.86%(24/37),TRUS与CT差别有统计学意义(P=0.02),而TRUS与MRI差别无统计学意义(P=0.40);术前TRUS、CT、MRI的N分期的准确度分别为63.01%(46/73)、66.67%(22/33)、81.08%(30/37) TRUS与CT差别无统计学意义(P=0.41),而TRUS与MRI差别有统计学意义(P=0.014)。结论 TRUS在评估直肠癌局部浸润深度上较CT更为准确,在评估直肠癌淋巴结转移方面MRI更为优越。
目的:評價經直腸雙平麵超聲聯閤經直腸三維超聲在直腸癌術前分期中的應用價值。方法73例直腸癌患者均行經直腸超聲檢查(TRUS),其中33例行CT檢查,37例行MRI檢查,檢查後分彆依據TRUS、CT、MRI對直腸癌進行T分期及N分期,併與術後病理對照。結果所有患者經手術證實為直腸癌,併穫得術後病理分期,術前TRUS、CT、MRI的T分期的準確度分彆為68.49%(50/73)、42.42%(14/33)、64.86%(24/37),TRUS與CT差彆有統計學意義(P=0.02),而TRUS與MRI差彆無統計學意義(P=0.40);術前TRUS、CT、MRI的N分期的準確度分彆為63.01%(46/73)、66.67%(22/33)、81.08%(30/37) TRUS與CT差彆無統計學意義(P=0.41),而TRUS與MRI差彆有統計學意義(P=0.014)。結論 TRUS在評估直腸癌跼部浸潤深度上較CT更為準確,在評估直腸癌淋巴結轉移方麵MRI更為優越。
목적:평개경직장쌍평면초성연합경직장삼유초성재직장암술전분기중적응용개치。방법73례직장암환자균행경직장초성검사(TRUS),기중33례행CT검사,37례행MRI검사,검사후분별의거TRUS、CT、MRI대직장암진행T분기급N분기,병여술후병리대조。결과소유환자경수술증실위직장암,병획득술후병리분기,술전TRUS、CT、MRI적T분기적준학도분별위68.49%(50/73)、42.42%(14/33)、64.86%(24/37),TRUS여CT차별유통계학의의(P=0.02),이TRUS여MRI차별무통계학의의(P=0.40);술전TRUS、CT、MRI적N분기적준학도분별위63.01%(46/73)、66.67%(22/33)、81.08%(30/37) TRUS여CT차별무통계학의의(P=0.41),이TRUS여MRI차별유통계학의의(P=0.014)。결론 TRUS재평고직장암국부침윤심도상교CT경위준학,재평고직장암림파결전이방면MRI경위우월。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of double-plane and three-dimensional transrectal ultrasonography for staging rectal carcinoma.Methods 73 patients with rectal cancer underwent preoperative transrectal ultrasound(TRUS).CT and MRI were also performed on 33 and 37 patients,respectively.Tumor and nodal staging were compared with the postoperative pathology. Results The accuracy of tumor staging was significantly(P=0.020)higher on TRUS(68.49%,50/73)than that on CT(42.42%, 14/33)and not significantly(P=0.400)different from that on MRI(64.86%,24/37).The accuracy of nodal staging was significantly (P=0.014)lower on TRUS(63.01%,46/73)than that on MRI(81.08%,30/37)and was not significantly(P=0.41)different from that on CT(66.67%,22/33).Conclusion TRUS is more accurate than CT in the staging of rectal cancer whereas MRI is superior in the assessment of lymph node metastasis.