CAJ | 학술논문

目的：了解杭州市城区初中教职工体力活动水平及其影响因素。方法2009年对杭州市3个城区的所有初中教职工进行横断面问卷调查。利用国际体力活动量表评价体力活动水平，采用Kruskal-Wallis秩和检验和多分类logistic回归法分析教职工体力活动水平的影响因素。结果1497名教职工达到低、中、高水平体力活动的比例分别为40.8%、40.6%和18.6%。与低水平体力活动的教职工相比较，年龄≥45岁（OR＝1.576，95%CI：1.128～2.201）和感到有一些压力（OR＝1.490，95%CI：1.141～1.946）的教职工达到中等水平体力活动的概率高。体力活动得分高（OR＝1.070，95%CI：1.002～1.143）、男性（OR＝3.088，95%CI：2.162～4.409）、同事经常/总是一起参加运动（OR＝2.903，95%CI：1.587～5.312）、同事有时一起参加运动（OR＝1.900，95%CI：1.160～3.110）和家附近有步行可达的地方（OR＝1.657，95%CI：1.022～2.688）达到高水平体力活动的概率高。婚姻状况、社会经济水平、工作年数、BMI、学历、同事鼓励参加运动与教职工增加体力活动水平的关联则无统计学意义。结论杭州市城区初中教职工的体力活动水平有待加强，开展体力活动促进需要考虑年龄、性别、工作压力和支持性的工作及居住环境等因素影响。
목적：료해항주시성구초중교직공체력활동수평급기영향인소。방법2009년대항주시3개성구적소유초중교직공진행횡단면문권조사。이용국제체력활동량표평개체력활동수평，채용Kruskal-Wallis질화검험화다분류logistic회귀법분석교직공체력활동수평적영향인소。결과1497명교직공체도저、중、고수평체력활동적비례분별위40.8%、40.6%화18.6%。여저수평체력활동적교직공상비교，년령≥45세（OR＝1.576，95%CI：1.128～2.201）화감도유일사압력（OR＝1.490，95%CI：1.141～1.946）적교직공체도중등수평체력활동적개솔고。체력활동득분고（OR＝1.070，95%CI：1.002～1.143）、남성（OR＝3.088，95%CI：2.162～4.409）、동사경상/총시일기삼가운동（OR＝2.903，95%CI：1.587～5.312）、동사유시일기삼가운동（OR＝1.900，95%CI：1.160～3.110）화가부근유보행가체적지방（OR＝1.657，95%CI：1.022～2.688）체도고수평체력활동적개솔고。혼인상황、사회경제수평、공작년수、BMI、학력、동사고려삼가운동여교직공증가체력활동수평적관련칙무통계학의의。결론항주시성구초중교직공적체력활동수평유대가강，개전체력활동촉진수요고필년령、성별、공작압력화지지성적공작급거주배경등인소영향。
Objective To explore the level of physical activities (PA) and related influencing factors among junior high school personnel in Hangzhou. Methods In a cross sectional study,a self administered questionnaire was used to assess the levels of PA. Kruskal-Wallis H test and ordinal regression were applied to analyze the related factors. Results Among the 1 497 school personnel included in this study,prevalence rates on the low,moderate and high levels of PA were 40.8%,40.6%and 18.6%,respectively. Data from the multinomial logistic regression analysis indicated that:when comparing with the low level,people aged ≥45(OR=1.576,95%CI:1.128-2.201) or those having minor perceived stress(OR=1.490,95%CI:1.141-1.946)more likely to fall into the moderate level. However,factors as higher awareness scores on the benefit of PA(OR=1.070, 95%CI:1.002-1.143),being male(OR=3.088,95%CI:2.162-4.409),always or very often taking PA together with colleagues(OR=2.903,95%CI:1.587-5.312),taking PA once in a while together with colleagues(OR=1.900,95%CI:1.160-3.110)or having space to walk around home(OR=1.657, 95%CI:1.022-2.688) would increase the likelihood of having high PA level. However,factors as marital status,socioeconomic status,years of working at school,BMI,level of having received education and positive impact from colleagues etc. did not seem to have significantly related to the PA level. Conclusion Gender,age,stress from work and supportive environment should be taken into account while planning on promoting the PA level among junior high school personnel in Hangzhou.