现代肿瘤医学
現代腫瘤醫學
현대종류의학
JOURNAL OF MODERN ONCOLOGY
2014年
5期
1107-1109
,共3页
刘敬涛%程永毅%孙羿%徐永刚%梁亮
劉敬濤%程永毅%孫羿%徐永剛%樑亮
류경도%정영의%손예%서영강%량량
非肌层浸润性膀胱肿瘤%经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术%早期膀胱灌注%吡柔比星
非肌層浸潤性膀胱腫瘤%經尿道膀胱腫瘤電切術%早期膀胱灌註%吡柔比星
비기층침윤성방광종류%경뇨도방광종류전절술%조기방광관주%필유비성
non-invasive BCa%TUR-BT%ProPhase intravascular instillation%Pirarubicin(TeP)
目的:探讨经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术(TUR - BT)后吡柔比星(TeP)早期膀胱灌注预防膀胱肿瘤复发的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2009年-2011年的142例非肌层浸润性膀胱肿瘤行 TUR - BT 患者资料,病例完全随机分为两组:A 组(72例)为术后吡柔比星早期膀胱灌注组,B 组(70例)为术后吡柔比星常规膀胱灌注组。术后定期复查及随访,监测患者并发症发生情况,两组随访期均为2年。结果:2年复发率:A 组为8.3%,B 组为21.4%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P ﹤0.05);两组均无明显的血尿常规异常、肝肾功能损害及全身不良反应;A 组的短期尿路刺激症状发生率为20.8%,B 组为18.6%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P﹥0.05);A 组的血尿发生率为8.3%,B 组为5.7%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P ﹥0.05)。结论:TUR - BT术后吡柔比星早期膀胱灌注是预防膀胱肿瘤复发有效且安全的治疗方法。
目的:探討經尿道膀胱腫瘤電切術(TUR - BT)後吡柔比星(TeP)早期膀胱灌註預防膀胱腫瘤複髮的臨床療效。方法:迴顧性分析2009年-2011年的142例非肌層浸潤性膀胱腫瘤行 TUR - BT 患者資料,病例完全隨機分為兩組:A 組(72例)為術後吡柔比星早期膀胱灌註組,B 組(70例)為術後吡柔比星常規膀胱灌註組。術後定期複查及隨訪,鑑測患者併髮癥髮生情況,兩組隨訪期均為2年。結果:2年複髮率:A 組為8.3%,B 組為21.4%,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P ﹤0.05);兩組均無明顯的血尿常規異常、肝腎功能損害及全身不良反應;A 組的短期尿路刺激癥狀髮生率為20.8%,B 組為18.6%,兩組比較差異無統計學意義(P﹥0.05);A 組的血尿髮生率為8.3%,B 組為5.7%,兩組比較差異無統計學意義(P ﹥0.05)。結論:TUR - BT術後吡柔比星早期膀胱灌註是預防膀胱腫瘤複髮有效且安全的治療方法。
목적:탐토경뇨도방광종류전절술(TUR - BT)후필유비성(TeP)조기방광관주예방방광종류복발적림상료효。방법:회고성분석2009년-2011년적142례비기층침윤성방광종류행 TUR - BT 환자자료,병례완전수궤분위량조:A 조(72례)위술후필유비성조기방광관주조,B 조(70례)위술후필유비성상규방광관주조。술후정기복사급수방,감측환자병발증발생정황,량조수방기균위2년。결과:2년복발솔:A 조위8.3%,B 조위21.4%,량조비교차이유통계학의의(P ﹤0.05);량조균무명현적혈뇨상규이상、간신공능손해급전신불량반응;A 조적단기뇨로자격증상발생솔위20.8%,B 조위18.6%,량조비교차이무통계학의의(P﹥0.05);A 조적혈뇨발생솔위8.3%,B 조위5.7%,량조비교차이무통계학의의(P ﹥0.05)。결론:TUR - BT술후필유비성조기방광관주시예방방광종류복발유효차안전적치료방법。
Objective:Evaluating the effection of ProPhase intravascular instillation of TeP in Preventing from re-current BCa after TUR - BT. Methods:All 142 non - invasive BCa Patients were selected who were randomly chosen for ProPhase treatment(GrouP A)or regular intravascular treatment(GrouP B)after TUR - BT. The recurrent rate and side effects during last two years were monitored. Results:Recurrent rate in two years were 8. 3% for PhoPhase treat-ment,21. 4% for regular treatment(P ﹤ 0. 05). No severe side effects and significant different(P ﹥ 0. 05)were ob-served between this two grouPs(hematuria:8. 3% for ProPhase treatment,5. 7% for regular treatment;bladder irrita-tion symPtoms:20. 8% for PhoPhase treatment,18. 6% for regular treatment). Conclusion:ProPhase intravascular in-stillation treatment is an effective and safe method for non - invasive bladder cancer treatment after TUR - BT.