中国肿瘤临床
中國腫瘤臨床
중국종류림상
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
2014年
9期
593-596
,共4页
曹玉娟%王德林%刘承伟%杜芳%郝龙英%曹凤%李伟伟%赵聪
曹玉娟%王德林%劉承偉%杜芳%郝龍英%曹鳳%李偉偉%趙聰
조옥연%왕덕림%류승위%두방%학룡영%조봉%리위위%조총
结直肠癌%临床疗效%伊立替康%卡培他滨%奥沙利铂
結直腸癌%臨床療效%伊立替康%卡培他濱%奧沙利鉑
결직장암%림상료효%이립체강%잡배타빈%오사리박
colorectal cancer%clinical effect%irinotecan%capecitabine%oxaliplatin
目的:研究分析伊立替康联合卡培他滨及奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨治疗晚期结直肠癌伴肝转移患者的疗效和不良反应。方法:入选结肠癌伴肝转移患者125例,随机分成两组,其中治疗组63例,对照组62例,两组均给予卡培他滨1000 mg/m2,每日2次,1~14 d,治疗组给予伊立替康150 mg/m2+0.9%氯化钠注射液250 mL,1 d静脉滴注,滴注1.5 h;对照组给予奥沙利铂130 mg/m2,1 d。随访的主要内容为无肿瘤进展生存时间(PFS)、中位生存时间(MST)、短期疗效和不良反应等。结果:治疗组的ORR、DCR分别为33.3%、66.7%;对照组ORR、DCR分别为35.5%、70.9%;两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗组和对照组的中位总生存期分别为14、12个月,相应的中位无进展生存期分别为5、4个月,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组Ⅲ、Ⅳ级药物不良反应主要为血液学毒性、消化道反应和手足综合症等,其治疗组的腹泻发生率明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);不良反应能得到有效控制,未影响化疗进程。结论:伊立替康联合卡培他滨和奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨治疗晚期结直肠癌伴肝转移患者的疗效较好,不良反应无明显增多,患者耐受良好,值得临床推广应用。
目的:研究分析伊立替康聯閤卡培他濱及奧沙利鉑聯閤卡培他濱治療晚期結直腸癌伴肝轉移患者的療效和不良反應。方法:入選結腸癌伴肝轉移患者125例,隨機分成兩組,其中治療組63例,對照組62例,兩組均給予卡培他濱1000 mg/m2,每日2次,1~14 d,治療組給予伊立替康150 mg/m2+0.9%氯化鈉註射液250 mL,1 d靜脈滴註,滴註1.5 h;對照組給予奧沙利鉑130 mg/m2,1 d。隨訪的主要內容為無腫瘤進展生存時間(PFS)、中位生存時間(MST)、短期療效和不良反應等。結果:治療組的ORR、DCR分彆為33.3%、66.7%;對照組ORR、DCR分彆為35.5%、70.9%;兩組比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。治療組和對照組的中位總生存期分彆為14、12箇月,相應的中位無進展生存期分彆為5、4箇月,兩組比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);兩組Ⅲ、Ⅳ級藥物不良反應主要為血液學毒性、消化道反應和手足綜閤癥等,其治療組的腹瀉髮生率明顯高于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);不良反應能得到有效控製,未影響化療進程。結論:伊立替康聯閤卡培他濱和奧沙利鉑聯閤卡培他濱治療晚期結直腸癌伴肝轉移患者的療效較好,不良反應無明顯增多,患者耐受良好,值得臨床推廣應用。
목적:연구분석이립체강연합잡배타빈급오사리박연합잡배타빈치료만기결직장암반간전이환자적료효화불량반응。방법:입선결장암반간전이환자125례,수궤분성량조,기중치료조63례,대조조62례,량조균급여잡배타빈1000 mg/m2,매일2차,1~14 d,치료조급여이립체강150 mg/m2+0.9%록화납주사액250 mL,1 d정맥적주,적주1.5 h;대조조급여오사리박130 mg/m2,1 d。수방적주요내용위무종류진전생존시간(PFS)、중위생존시간(MST)、단기료효화불량반응등。결과:치료조적ORR、DCR분별위33.3%、66.7%;대조조ORR、DCR분별위35.5%、70.9%;량조비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。치료조화대조조적중위총생존기분별위14、12개월,상응적중위무진전생존기분별위5、4개월,량조비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);량조Ⅲ、Ⅳ급약물불량반응주요위혈액학독성、소화도반응화수족종합증등,기치료조적복사발생솔명현고우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);불량반응능득도유효공제,미영향화료진정。결론:이립체강연합잡배타빈화오사리박연합잡배타빈치료만기결직장암반간전이환자적료효교호,불량반응무명현증다,환자내수량호,치득림상추엄응용。
Objective:This study aims to evaluate the clinical effect and adverse reactions of oxaliplatin or irinotecan plus capecitabine treatment for colorectal liver metastases. Methods:Data from 125 cases of colorectal liver metastasis patients were continuously enrolled and randomized into two groups, i.e., 63 in group one (treatment group) and the other 62 in group two (the control group). Capecitabine was administered at 1 000 mg/m2 doses, twice a day from d1 to d14, to all patients. Irinotecan was administered at 150 mg/m2 in d1 to group one, and oxaliplatin was administered at 130 mg/m2 in d1 to group two. The drug administration cycle lasted for 21 days in both regimens, with at least 6 administration cycles. The total course was for 6 months at most. The therapeutic efficacy, median progression-free survival time, median survival time, short-term clinical effect, and adverse drug reaction were monthly determined. Results:The overall response rates and disease control rates were 33.3%and 66.7%in group one, respectively, and 35.5%and 70.9%in group two, respectively, with no significant differences between the groups (P>0.05). The median survival time and median progression-free survival time were 14 months and 5 months in group one, respectively, and 12 months and 5 months in group two, with no significant differences between the two groups (P>0.05). The level-Ⅲand-Ⅳadverse drug reactions mainly include hematological toxicity, gastrointestinal reactions, and hand-foot syndrome. The diarrhea frequency is obviously higher in group one than in group two, and the difference between the two groups is sta-tistically significant (P<0.05). No significant differences were observed in the other adverse reactions between the groups (P>0.05). Conclusion:The Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan plus Capecitabine treatment is effective for colorectal liver metastases, which enhances survival rate and reduces patient suffering because of it has less side effects and good tolerance. The treatment must be further generalized and clinically applied.