化工学报
化工學報
화공학보
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INDUSY AND ENGINEERING (CHINA)
2014年
5期
1920-1927
,共8页
纪拓%陈献富%季兴宏%王喜兵%杨祝红%陆小华
紀拓%陳獻富%季興宏%王喜兵%楊祝紅%陸小華
기탁%진헌부%계흥굉%왕희병%양축홍%륙소화
氧化铝%二氧化钛%生物载体%复合材料%蛋白质%吸附
氧化鋁%二氧化鈦%生物載體%複閤材料%蛋白質%吸附
양화려%이양화태%생물재체%복합재료%단백질%흡부
alumina%titania%biological support%composites%protein%adsorption
通过钛酸盐和氧化钛溶胶两种制备途径在氧化铝(Al2O3)支撑体外包覆介孔氧化钛(TiO2)层,分析了这两种途径制备的氧化钛表面结构与性质的差异及其对于BSA蛋白吸附性能的影响。以粒径分别为0.37、10.4和21.8μm的三种氧化铝支撑体作为基材,用 XRD、Raman 分析了两种路径制备的氧化钛晶型均为锐钛矿相;N2吸脱附分析其比表面积均在(100±10)m2·g-1,两者具有相似的介孔结构。FESEM分析发现钛酸钾溶胶制备的氧化钛的形貌受到支撑体孔径的影响。对于在牛血清蛋白(BSA)吸附实验中,钛酸钾溶胶法包覆的20μm 粒径复合载体(SP20@K-TiO2)吸附量为22.18 mg·g-1,高于相同条件下氧化钛溶胶制备的Al2O3@TiO2复合载体。SP20@K-TiO2中TiO2吸附量为150.88 mg·g-1,相比于TiO2粉体,复合载体中TiO2对BSA蛋白吸附的性能得到提升。
通過鈦痠鹽和氧化鈦溶膠兩種製備途徑在氧化鋁(Al2O3)支撐體外包覆介孔氧化鈦(TiO2)層,分析瞭這兩種途徑製備的氧化鈦錶麵結構與性質的差異及其對于BSA蛋白吸附性能的影響。以粒徑分彆為0.37、10.4和21.8μm的三種氧化鋁支撐體作為基材,用 XRD、Raman 分析瞭兩種路徑製備的氧化鈦晶型均為銳鈦礦相;N2吸脫附分析其比錶麵積均在(100±10)m2·g-1,兩者具有相似的介孔結構。FESEM分析髮現鈦痠鉀溶膠製備的氧化鈦的形貌受到支撐體孔徑的影響。對于在牛血清蛋白(BSA)吸附實驗中,鈦痠鉀溶膠法包覆的20μm 粒徑複閤載體(SP20@K-TiO2)吸附量為22.18 mg·g-1,高于相同條件下氧化鈦溶膠製備的Al2O3@TiO2複閤載體。SP20@K-TiO2中TiO2吸附量為150.88 mg·g-1,相比于TiO2粉體,複閤載體中TiO2對BSA蛋白吸附的性能得到提升。
통과태산염화양화태용효량충제비도경재양화려(Al2O3)지탱체외포복개공양화태(TiO2)층,분석료저량충도경제비적양화태표면결구여성질적차이급기대우BSA단백흡부성능적영향。이립경분별위0.37、10.4화21.8μm적삼충양화려지탱체작위기재,용 XRD、Raman 분석료량충로경제비적양화태정형균위예태광상;N2흡탈부분석기비표면적균재(100±10)m2·g-1,량자구유상사적개공결구。FESEM분석발현태산갑용효제비적양화태적형모수도지탱체공경적영향。대우재우혈청단백(BSA)흡부실험중,태산갑용효법포복적20μm 립경복합재체(SP20@K-TiO2)흡부량위22.18 mg·g-1,고우상동조건하양화태용효제비적Al2O3@TiO2복합재체。SP20@K-TiO2중TiO2흡부량위150.88 mg·g-1,상비우TiO2분체,복합재체중TiO2대BSA단백흡부적성능득도제승。
A series of Al2O3@TiO2 composite supports were prepared and they were covered with a layer of mesoporous TiO2 by using titanate sol or titania sol. The differences of structures and properties of two TiO2 samples and their influences on adsorption of bovine serum albumin (BSA) were analyzed. The pore sizes of three alumina supports were 0.37,10.4 and 21.8μm respectively. The results of XRD and Raman spectroscopy showed that both TiO2 samples were anatase phase. In addition, N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms showed that two samples had similar surface area [(100±10) m2·g-1] and mesoporous structure. Moreover, FESEM image indicated that the morphologies of TiO2 prepared from potassium titanate sol were affected by pore diameter of Al2O3support. BSA adsorption performance indicated that the adsorption capacity of 20μm Al2O3@TiO2 composite support prepared with potassium titanate sol (SP20@K-TiO2) was 22.18 mg·g-1, higher than the same size composite support prepared with titania sol. The adsorption capacity of TiO2 in SP20@K-TiO2 waps 150.88 mg·g-1. Compared with TiO2 powder, the BSA adsorption performance of TiO2 in the composite support was promoted.