临床精神医学杂志
臨床精神醫學雜誌
림상정신의학잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
2014年
2期
104-106,107
,共4页
王月宾%许禄云%杨林顺%杨丽梅%杨红尧
王月賓%許祿雲%楊林順%楊麗梅%楊紅堯
왕월빈%허록운%양림순%양려매%양홍요
自我护理能力%精神分裂症%信效度%量表
自我護理能力%精神分裂癥%信效度%量錶
자아호리능력%정신분렬증%신효도%량표
exercise of self care agency%schizophrenia%reliability%validity
目的:评价自我护理能力实施量表(ESCA)中文版在精神分裂症患者中的信度和效度。方法:抽取120例精神分裂症患者进行 ESCA 初测,进行初步的项目分析;正式施测阶段抽取300例精神分裂症患者,7 d 后对其中30例进行重测,计算克朗巴赫α系数、重测信度评价量表内部一致性;采用探索性因子分析方法考评量表结构效度;相关分析来评价量表的效标效度。结果:条目一总分相关法及决断值法对条目的区分度进行分析后,组成32个条目的新量表,经最大方差旋转法旋转后提取4个因子,4个因子累计解释的方差为42.38%;ESCA 与日常生活能力评定量表、护士用住院病人观察量表相关系数分别为0.29,0.63;Cranach's α系数为0.88,重测信度为0.62。结论:ESCA 中文版具有较好的信度和效度,用于精神分裂症患者自我护理能力的研究需要反复修订。
目的:評價自我護理能力實施量錶(ESCA)中文版在精神分裂癥患者中的信度和效度。方法:抽取120例精神分裂癥患者進行 ESCA 初測,進行初步的項目分析;正式施測階段抽取300例精神分裂癥患者,7 d 後對其中30例進行重測,計算剋朗巴赫α繫數、重測信度評價量錶內部一緻性;採用探索性因子分析方法攷評量錶結構效度;相關分析來評價量錶的效標效度。結果:條目一總分相關法及決斷值法對條目的區分度進行分析後,組成32箇條目的新量錶,經最大方差鏇轉法鏇轉後提取4箇因子,4箇因子纍計解釋的方差為42.38%;ESCA 與日常生活能力評定量錶、護士用住院病人觀察量錶相關繫數分彆為0.29,0.63;Cranach's α繫數為0.88,重測信度為0.62。結論:ESCA 中文版具有較好的信度和效度,用于精神分裂癥患者自我護理能力的研究需要反複脩訂。
목적:평개자아호리능력실시량표(ESCA)중문판재정신분렬증환자중적신도화효도。방법:추취120례정신분렬증환자진행 ESCA 초측,진행초보적항목분석;정식시측계단추취300례정신분렬증환자,7 d 후대기중30례진행중측,계산극랑파혁α계수、중측신도평개량표내부일치성;채용탐색성인자분석방법고평량표결구효도;상관분석래평개량표적효표효도。결과:조목일총분상관법급결단치법대조목적구분도진행분석후,조성32개조목적신량표,경최대방차선전법선전후제취4개인자,4개인자루계해석적방차위42.38%;ESCA 여일상생활능력평정량표、호사용주원병인관찰량표상관계수분별위0.29,0.63;Cranach's α계수위0.88,중측신도위0.62。결론:ESCA 중문판구유교호적신도화효도,용우정신분렬증환자자아호리능력적연구수요반복수정。
Objective:To assess the reliability and validity of Chinese version in the exercise of self-care agency scale(ESCA)in patients with schizophrenia. Method:In pre-test phase,the scale was administered to 120 schizophrenia patients and the item analysis was conducted. In the formal test phase,300 schizophrenia patients,30 of whom took it again 7 days later took the scale. Cronbach's α coefficient and test-retest reliability was calculated. Construct validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis method,and the criterion validity was assessed using correlation analysis. Results:Thirty five items composed the scale in terms of item dis-crimination index,and four factors were extracted from 32 items by varimax rotation,accounting for 42. 38% of the total variance. ESCA was significantly correlated with daily life ability scale and nurses'observation scale for in-patient evaluation(r =0.29 and 0.63,respectively). The Cronbach's α coefficient was 0. 88. The test-retest reliability was 0.62. Conclusion:ESCA Chinese version has good reliability and validity.