实用医院临床杂志
實用醫院臨床雜誌
실용의원림상잡지
PRACTICAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
2014年
3期
65-67
,共3页
刘丽红%李杰%郝清斌%刘庆多%董新峰%周步琴%蒲宝平
劉麗紅%李傑%郝清斌%劉慶多%董新峰%週步琴%蒲寶平
류려홍%리걸%학청빈%류경다%동신봉%주보금%포보평
肝细胞癌%超声造影%定量分析%增强CT
肝細胞癌%超聲造影%定量分析%增彊CT
간세포암%초성조영%정량분석%증강CT
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)%Contrasr-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS)%Quantitative analysis%Contrast-enhanced computed tomography ( CECT)
目的:对比研究肝细胞肝癌( hepatocellular carcinoma , HCC )的超声造影( contrast-enhanced ultrasonography , CEUS)定量分析和增强CT(contrast-enhanced computed tomography ,CECT)影像学特点,评价CEUS定量分析技术对提高HCC诊断准确性的临床价值。方法对46例可疑肝脏病灶进行CEUS定量分析、常规CEUS和CECT检查,以病理诊断为金标准,对三种方法诊断HCC的敏感性、特异性和诊断符合率进行比较。结果 CEUS定量分析技术诊断HCC的敏感性和诊断符合率明显高于常规CEUS及CECT,特异性较CEUS高(P<0.05),与CECT比较差异无统计学意义。结论 CEUS定量分析技术可明显提高HCC诊断的准确性,具有一定临床实用价值。
目的:對比研究肝細胞肝癌( hepatocellular carcinoma , HCC )的超聲造影( contrast-enhanced ultrasonography , CEUS)定量分析和增彊CT(contrast-enhanced computed tomography ,CECT)影像學特點,評價CEUS定量分析技術對提高HCC診斷準確性的臨床價值。方法對46例可疑肝髒病竈進行CEUS定量分析、常規CEUS和CECT檢查,以病理診斷為金標準,對三種方法診斷HCC的敏感性、特異性和診斷符閤率進行比較。結果 CEUS定量分析技術診斷HCC的敏感性和診斷符閤率明顯高于常規CEUS及CECT,特異性較CEUS高(P<0.05),與CECT比較差異無統計學意義。結論 CEUS定量分析技術可明顯提高HCC診斷的準確性,具有一定臨床實用價值。
목적:대비연구간세포간암( hepatocellular carcinoma , HCC )적초성조영( contrast-enhanced ultrasonography , CEUS)정량분석화증강CT(contrast-enhanced computed tomography ,CECT)영상학특점,평개CEUS정량분석기술대제고HCC진단준학성적림상개치。방법대46례가의간장병조진행CEUS정량분석、상규CEUS화CECT검사,이병리진단위금표준,대삼충방법진단HCC적민감성、특이성화진단부합솔진행비교。결과 CEUS정량분석기술진단HCC적민감성화진단부합솔명현고우상규CEUS급CECT,특이성교CEUS고(P<0.05),여CECT비교차이무통계학의의。결론 CEUS정량분석기술가명현제고HCC진단적준학성,구유일정림상실용개치。
Objective To assess the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography ( CEUS) quantitative analysis in hepatocellu-lar carcinoma ( HCC) by comparing it with contrast-enhanced computed tomography ( CECT) .Methods Ultrasonic imaging quantita-tive analysis,CEUS and CECT were performed in 46 cases of suspected HCC patients .The differences of sensitivity ,specificity and ac-curacy of three means on the basis of pathological diagnosis were compared .Results Sensitivity and accuracy of ultrasonic imaging quantitative analysis technology better than CEUS and CECT ,its specificity better than CEUS and there was no statistically significant difference compared with CECT .Conclusion Ultrasonic imaging quantitative analysis technology can obviously improve the accuracy of diagnosis of HCC and has higher clinical value .