动物营养学报
動物營養學報
동물영양학보
ACTA ZOONUTRIMENTA SINICA
2014年
5期
1327-1332
,共6页
蛋鸡%酵母细胞壁%益生素%生产性能%免疫功能
蛋鷄%酵母細胞壁%益生素%生產性能%免疫功能
단계%효모세포벽%익생소%생산성능%면역공능
layer%yeast cell wall%probiotics%performance%immunity
本研究旨在探讨酵母细胞壁和益生素的不同添加剂量组合对蛋鸡生产性能与免疫功能的影响。试验选择19周龄体重相近、健康的海兰褐蛋鸡512只,随机分成4组,分别饲喂基础饲粮(对照组,A组)、基础饲粮+0.4 mg/kg酵母细胞壁+50 mL/t益生素( B组)、基础饲粮+0.8 mg/kg酵母细胞壁+100 mL/t益生素( C组)、基础饲粮+1.2 mg/kg酵母细胞壁+150 mL/t益生素(D组),预试期1周,正试期8周。结果表明:1)整个试验期各组间蛋鸡日采食量、平均蛋重没有显著差异(P>0.05)。 B、C和D组蛋鸡日产蛋量与产蛋率比A组均有不同程度的提高,其分别提高了2.76%( P>0.05)、6.22%( P<0.05)、2.26%( P>0.05)和2.83%( P>0.05)、6.19%(P<0.05)、2.27%( P>0.05);料蛋比降低,分别下降了3.83%( P<0.05)、6.70%( P<0.05)、2.87%(P>0.05)。 C组蛋鸡日产蛋量、产蛋率与B、D组相比均有显著提高(P<0.05);料蛋比下降,分别下降了2.99%( P>0.05)和3.94%( P<0.05)。2)试验第14天和第28天,B、C和D组蛋鸡血清新城疫抗体效价均比A组有显著或极显著提高( P<0.05或P<0.01);C组蛋鸡血清新城疫抗体效价比B、D组均有提高,但差异不显著( P>0.05)。3)试验第14天和第28天, B、C和D组蛋鸡血液淋巴细胞转化率均比A组有显著或极显著提高( P<0.05或P<0.01);C组蛋鸡血液淋巴细胞转化率比B、D组均有提高,但差异不显著( P>0.05)。结果提示,饲粮中酵母细胞壁和益生素的不同添加剂量组合均可改善蛋鸡生产性能与免疫功能,以添加0.8 mg/kg酵母细胞壁+100 mL/t益生素效果最佳。
本研究旨在探討酵母細胞壁和益生素的不同添加劑量組閤對蛋鷄生產性能與免疫功能的影響。試驗選擇19週齡體重相近、健康的海蘭褐蛋鷄512隻,隨機分成4組,分彆飼餵基礎飼糧(對照組,A組)、基礎飼糧+0.4 mg/kg酵母細胞壁+50 mL/t益生素( B組)、基礎飼糧+0.8 mg/kg酵母細胞壁+100 mL/t益生素( C組)、基礎飼糧+1.2 mg/kg酵母細胞壁+150 mL/t益生素(D組),預試期1週,正試期8週。結果錶明:1)整箇試驗期各組間蛋鷄日採食量、平均蛋重沒有顯著差異(P>0.05)。 B、C和D組蛋鷄日產蛋量與產蛋率比A組均有不同程度的提高,其分彆提高瞭2.76%( P>0.05)、6.22%( P<0.05)、2.26%( P>0.05)和2.83%( P>0.05)、6.19%(P<0.05)、2.27%( P>0.05);料蛋比降低,分彆下降瞭3.83%( P<0.05)、6.70%( P<0.05)、2.87%(P>0.05)。 C組蛋鷄日產蛋量、產蛋率與B、D組相比均有顯著提高(P<0.05);料蛋比下降,分彆下降瞭2.99%( P>0.05)和3.94%( P<0.05)。2)試驗第14天和第28天,B、C和D組蛋鷄血清新城疫抗體效價均比A組有顯著或極顯著提高( P<0.05或P<0.01);C組蛋鷄血清新城疫抗體效價比B、D組均有提高,但差異不顯著( P>0.05)。3)試驗第14天和第28天, B、C和D組蛋鷄血液淋巴細胞轉化率均比A組有顯著或極顯著提高( P<0.05或P<0.01);C組蛋鷄血液淋巴細胞轉化率比B、D組均有提高,但差異不顯著( P>0.05)。結果提示,飼糧中酵母細胞壁和益生素的不同添加劑量組閤均可改善蛋鷄生產性能與免疫功能,以添加0.8 mg/kg酵母細胞壁+100 mL/t益生素效果最佳。
본연구지재탐토효모세포벽화익생소적불동첨가제량조합대단계생산성능여면역공능적영향。시험선택19주령체중상근、건강적해란갈단계512지,수궤분성4조,분별사위기출사량(대조조,A조)、기출사량+0.4 mg/kg효모세포벽+50 mL/t익생소( B조)、기출사량+0.8 mg/kg효모세포벽+100 mL/t익생소( C조)、기출사량+1.2 mg/kg효모세포벽+150 mL/t익생소(D조),예시기1주,정시기8주。결과표명:1)정개시험기각조간단계일채식량、평균단중몰유현저차이(P>0.05)。 B、C화D조단계일산단량여산단솔비A조균유불동정도적제고,기분별제고료2.76%( P>0.05)、6.22%( P<0.05)、2.26%( P>0.05)화2.83%( P>0.05)、6.19%(P<0.05)、2.27%( P>0.05);료단비강저,분별하강료3.83%( P<0.05)、6.70%( P<0.05)、2.87%(P>0.05)。 C조단계일산단량、산단솔여B、D조상비균유현저제고(P<0.05);료단비하강,분별하강료2.99%( P>0.05)화3.94%( P<0.05)。2)시험제14천화제28천,B、C화D조단계혈청신성역항체효개균비A조유현저혹겁현저제고( P<0.05혹P<0.01);C조단계혈청신성역항체효개비B、D조균유제고,단차이불현저( P>0.05)。3)시험제14천화제28천, B、C화D조단계혈액림파세포전화솔균비A조유현저혹겁현저제고( P<0.05혹P<0.01);C조단계혈액림파세포전화솔비B、D조균유제고,단차이불현저( P>0.05)。결과제시,사량중효모세포벽화익생소적불동첨가제량조합균가개선단계생산성능여면역공능,이첨가0.8 mg/kg효모세포벽+100 mL/t익생소효과최가。
This study was conducted to investigate the effects of different dose combinations of yeast cell wall and probiotics on the performance and immunity of laying hens.A total of 512 Hy-Line Brown layers aged 19 weeks ( similar weight, healthy) were selected and randomly assigned into 4 groups.Layers were fed a basal diet ( control, group A) , basal diet+0.4 mg/kg yeast cell wall+50 mL/t probiotics ( group B) , basal diet+0.8 mg/kg yeast cell wall+100 mL/t probiotics ( group C) , basal diet +1.2 mg/kg yeast cell wall+150 mL/t probiotics ( group D) , respectively.Preliminary trial lasted for 1 week, and experimental period lasted for 8 weeks.The results showed as follows:1) in the whole experimental period, there were no significant differ-ences in average egg weight and daily feed intake among all groups ( P>0.05) .Compared with group A, daily egg production and laying rate of groups B, C and D were increased by 2.76%( P>0.05), 6.22%( P<0.05), 2.26%(P>0.05) and 2.83%(P>0.05), 6.19%(P<0.05) and 2.27%(P>0.05), respectively;feed/egg of groups B, C and D were decreased by 3.83%(P<0.05), 6.70%(P>0.05) and 2.87%(P>0.05) , respectively.Daily egg production and laying rate of group C was significantly higher than those of groups B and D ( P<0.05) , feed/egg was decreased by 2.99%( P>0.05) and 3.94%( P<0.05) , respective-ly.2) At the 14th and 28th day of the experiment, Newcastle antibody titers of groups B, C and D were sig-nificantly increased compared with group A ( P<0.05 or P<0.01); Newcastle antibody titer of group C was higher than that of group A, but there was no significant difference ( P>0.05) .3) At the 14th and 28th day of the experiment, lymphocyte transformation rate of groups B, C and D were significantly higher than that of group A (P<0.05 or P<0.01); lymphocyte transformation rate of group C was higher than that of groups B and D, but there was no significant difference ( P>0.05) .In conclusion,it has obvious effects of the different dose combinations of yeast cell wall and probiotics on performance and immunity of layer.It has the best effects by adding 0.8 mg/kg yeast cell wall+100 mL/t probiotics.