中国康复理论与实践
中國康複理論與實踐
중국강복이론여실천
CHINESE JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION THEORY & PRACTICE
2014年
5期
467-469
,共3页
刘欣%张云鹏%王磊%卢占斌%陈先%黄玉国%郁冰
劉訢%張雲鵬%王磊%盧佔斌%陳先%黃玉國%鬱冰
류흔%장운붕%왕뢰%로점빈%진선%황옥국%욱빙
功能性踝关节不稳%姿势控制%单腿站立试验%足踝功能障碍指数%康复指导
功能性踝關節不穩%姿勢控製%單腿站立試驗%足踝功能障礙指數%康複指導
공능성과관절불은%자세공제%단퇴참립시험%족과공능장애지수%강복지도
functional ankle instability%postural control%One Leg Standing Test%Foot and Ankle Disability Index%rehabilitation direc-tion
目的:探讨正规康复指导对功能性踝关节不稳(FAI)患者踝关节功能的影响。方法32例FAI患者随机分为两组,治疗组(n=16)在物理治疗师的指导下,在医院内行4周下肢功能及姿势控制训练;对照组(n=16)在家中按照康复计划自行训练。训练前后进行单腿站立试验(OLST)及足踝功能障碍指数(FADI)评定。结果训练后,治疗组OLST评分明显减低(P<0.01),且低于对照组(P<0.05);对照组OLST评分与训练前无显著性差异(P>0.05)。训练后,治疗组FADI评分明显提高(P<0.01),且高于对照组(P<0.05);对照组FADI评分与训练前无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论正规指导下的综合康复训练有助于恢复FAI患者踝关节本体感觉及踝关节稳定控制能力。
目的:探討正規康複指導對功能性踝關節不穩(FAI)患者踝關節功能的影響。方法32例FAI患者隨機分為兩組,治療組(n=16)在物理治療師的指導下,在醫院內行4週下肢功能及姿勢控製訓練;對照組(n=16)在傢中按照康複計劃自行訓練。訓練前後進行單腿站立試驗(OLST)及足踝功能障礙指數(FADI)評定。結果訓練後,治療組OLST評分明顯減低(P<0.01),且低于對照組(P<0.05);對照組OLST評分與訓練前無顯著性差異(P>0.05)。訓練後,治療組FADI評分明顯提高(P<0.01),且高于對照組(P<0.05);對照組FADI評分與訓練前無顯著性差異(P>0.05)。結論正規指導下的綜閤康複訓練有助于恢複FAI患者踝關節本體感覺及踝關節穩定控製能力。
목적:탐토정규강복지도대공능성과관절불은(FAI)환자과관절공능적영향。방법32례FAI환자수궤분위량조,치료조(n=16)재물리치료사적지도하,재의원내행4주하지공능급자세공제훈련;대조조(n=16)재가중안조강복계화자행훈련。훈련전후진행단퇴참립시험(OLST)급족과공능장애지수(FADI)평정。결과훈련후,치료조OLST평분명현감저(P<0.01),차저우대조조(P<0.05);대조조OLST평분여훈련전무현저성차이(P>0.05)。훈련후,치료조FADI평분명현제고(P<0.01),차고우대조조(P<0.05);대조조FADI평분여훈련전무현저성차이(P>0.05)。결론정규지도하적종합강복훈련유조우회복FAI환자과관절본체감각급과관절은정공제능력。
Objective To investigate the effect of comprehensive rehabilitation direction on functional ankle instability (FAI). Methods 32 consecutive patients with FAI were divided into 2 groups. The rehabilitation group (n=16) finished their rehabilitation program under the instruction of physiotherapists in the hospital, and the control group (n=16) exercised at home by written instruction. All the patients were tested with One Leg Standing Test (OLST) and Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) for the injured ankle before and 4 weeks after train-ing. Results The scores of both OLST and FADI improved after training in the rehabilitation group (P<0.01), but did not in the control group (P>0.05);and improved more in the rehabilitation group than in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The comprehensive rehabili-tation direction is effctive on FAI.