南方医科大学学报
南方醫科大學學報
남방의과대학학보
JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
2014年
5期
704-708
,共5页
左辉华%刘强%张志玲%王丽丽%翁建新%魏熠%罗新林%陈绮映%曹茜
左輝華%劉彊%張誌玲%王麗麗%翁建新%魏熠%囉新林%陳綺映%曹茜
좌휘화%류강%장지령%왕려려%옹건신%위습%라신림%진기영%조천
冠脉临界病变%血流储备分数%血管内超声%经皮介入治疗
冠脈臨界病變%血流儲備分數%血管內超聲%經皮介入治療
관맥림계병변%혈류저비분수%혈관내초성%경피개입치료
intermediate coronary lesion%fractional flow reserve%intravascular ultrasound%percutaneous coronary intervention
目的:评价在冠脉临界病变患者中,经血管内超声(IVUS)指导介入治疗的患者与经测定血流储备分数(FFR)指导介入治疗的患者的远期临床效果。方法选取冠脉造影证实冠脉狭窄程度40%~70%的患者共226例(293处病变),分为血管内超声指导组98处病变、血流储备分数指导组101处病变、药物治疗组94处病变。在血管内超声指导组中,如狭窄处最小管腔面积(MLA)<4 mm2行冠脉支架置入术;在血流储备分数组中,如FFR<0.8予以行介入治疗。术后随访1年,比较3组患者的主要心血管不良事件发生率(死亡、心梗、靶血管重建)。结果(1)3组患者冠脉造影显示的狭窄程度及病变长度无明显差别;(2)血管内超声指导组行冠脉介入治疗术的患者比例高于血流储备分数指导组(P<0.001);(3)3组患者的主要心血管不良事件的发生率无明显差别(P=0.182)。结论血流储备分数检测及血管内超声检查均可以用于指导冠脉临界病变的介入治疗策略,血管内超声检查仅依靠单一的测定狭窄处最小管腔面积作为介入治疗的标准可能会增加介入干预患者比例。
目的:評價在冠脈臨界病變患者中,經血管內超聲(IVUS)指導介入治療的患者與經測定血流儲備分數(FFR)指導介入治療的患者的遠期臨床效果。方法選取冠脈造影證實冠脈狹窄程度40%~70%的患者共226例(293處病變),分為血管內超聲指導組98處病變、血流儲備分數指導組101處病變、藥物治療組94處病變。在血管內超聲指導組中,如狹窄處最小管腔麵積(MLA)<4 mm2行冠脈支架置入術;在血流儲備分數組中,如FFR<0.8予以行介入治療。術後隨訪1年,比較3組患者的主要心血管不良事件髮生率(死亡、心梗、靶血管重建)。結果(1)3組患者冠脈造影顯示的狹窄程度及病變長度無明顯差彆;(2)血管內超聲指導組行冠脈介入治療術的患者比例高于血流儲備分數指導組(P<0.001);(3)3組患者的主要心血管不良事件的髮生率無明顯差彆(P=0.182)。結論血流儲備分數檢測及血管內超聲檢查均可以用于指導冠脈臨界病變的介入治療策略,血管內超聲檢查僅依靠單一的測定狹窄處最小管腔麵積作為介入治療的標準可能會增加介入榦預患者比例。
목적:평개재관맥림계병변환자중,경혈관내초성(IVUS)지도개입치료적환자여경측정혈류저비분수(FFR)지도개입치료적환자적원기림상효과。방법선취관맥조영증실관맥협착정도40%~70%적환자공226례(293처병변),분위혈관내초성지도조98처병변、혈류저비분수지도조101처병변、약물치료조94처병변。재혈관내초성지도조중,여협착처최소관강면적(MLA)<4 mm2행관맥지가치입술;재혈류저비분수조중,여FFR<0.8여이행개입치료。술후수방1년,비교3조환자적주요심혈관불량사건발생솔(사망、심경、파혈관중건)。결과(1)3조환자관맥조영현시적협착정도급병변장도무명현차별;(2)혈관내초성지도조행관맥개입치료술적환자비례고우혈류저비분수지도조(P<0.001);(3)3조환자적주요심혈관불량사건적발생솔무명현차별(P=0.182)。결론혈류저비분수검측급혈관내초성검사균가이용우지도관맥림계병변적개입치료책략,혈관내초성검사부의고단일적측정협착처최소관강면적작위개입치료적표준가능회증가개입간예환자비례。
Objective To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided versus intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for intermediate coronary lesions. Methods A total of 226 patients with 293 intermediate coronary artery lesions (stenosis of 40%-70%) confirmed by coronary angiography were randomized into 3 groups to undergo PCI for a minimal lumen cross sectional area (MLA)<4 mm2 (IVUS group, 98 lesions) or for a FFR<0.80 (FFR group, 101 lesions), or to receive standard medical treatment (medication group, 94 lesions). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events including death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia- driven target vessel revascularization at 1 year after the index procedure. Results The baseline percent diameter stenosis and lesion length were similar between the 3 groups, but more patients in IVUS group than in FFR group received PCI (P<0.001). No significant difference was found in the incidence of major adverse cardiac events between the 3 groups (P=0.182). Conclusions Both FFR-and IVUS-guided PCI strategy for intermediate coronary artery disease are associated with favorable outcomes, but IVUS-guided PCI based on the single index of MLA can increase the rate of revascularization therapy.