CAJ | 학술논문

以500名在校大学生为研究对象,采用社会支持评定量表、应对方式问卷和总体幸福感量表进行问卷调查,探讨大学生社会支持、应对方式与主观幸福感的关系,并检验应对方式的中介效应.结果显示：(1)社会支持在性别、年级差异上均无统计学意义；应对各因子性别差异无统计学意义,解决问题、自责、幻想、退避四个应对因子存在显著年级差异；主观幸福感得分男生显著高于女生,并存在显著年级差异.(2)社会支持与主观幸福感呈显著正相关；解决问题、求助两个应对因子与主观幸福感呈显著正相关,自责、幻想、退避、合理化四个应对因子与主观幸福感呈显著负相关.(3)社会支持对主观幸福感有明显的直接效应(β=0.289,P <0.001),而且应对方式中介效应也显著(β=0.197,β=-0.366,P <0.001),其中成熟应对方式中介效应占总效应的29.7%,不成熟应对方式中介效应占总效应的18.9%.
이500명재교대학생위연구대상,채용사회지지평정량표、응대방식문권화총체행복감량표진행문권조사,탐토대학생사회지지、응대방식여주관행복감적관계,병검험응대방식적중개효응.결과현시：(1)사회지지재성별、년급차이상균무통계학의의；응대각인자성별차이무통계학의의,해결문제、자책、환상、퇴피사개응대인자존재현저년급차이；주관행복감득분남생현저고우녀생,병존재현저년급차이.(2)사회지지여주관행복감정현저정상관；해결문제、구조량개응대인자여주관행복감정현저정상관,자책、환상、퇴피、합이화사개응대인자여주관행복감정현저부상관.(3)사회지지대주관행복감유명현적직접효응(β=0.289,P <0.001),이차응대방식중개효응야현저(β=0.197,β=-0.366,P <0.001),기중성숙응대방식중개효응점총효응적29.7%,불성숙응대방식중개효응점총효응적18.9%.
A survey was carried out on 500 college students through Social Support Rating Scale, Coping Style Questionnaire and General Well being Rating Scale and a discussion was organized to talk about the relationship of social support,coping style and subj ective well being of college students in or-der to examine the mediation effect of coping style.The results show:(1)Social support has no statisti-cal meaning in gender and grade difference,gender difference of coping factors has no statistical mean-ing,the four coping factors including problem solving,self blame,illusion and avoidance differ signifi-cantly in grade,boy students score much higher in subj ective well being than girl students and there is significant discrepancies between different grades.(2)Social support has significant positive correlation with subj ective well being;problem solving and help seeking have significant positive correlation with subj ective well being,self blame,and illusion,avoidance,and rationalization has significant negative correlation with subjective well being.(3)Social support has evident direct effect on subjective well being(β=0.289,P <0.001)and the mediation effect of coping style is significant (β=0.197,β=-0.366,P<0.001),of which mediation effect of mature coping style accounts for 2 9 .7% of the overall effect while mediation effect of immature coping style accounts for 18.9%.