海南医学
海南醫學
해남의학
HAINAN MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
8期
1135-1137
,共3页
玻璃体手术%超声乳化术%晶状体切除术%增生性糖尿病视网膜病变%白内障
玻璃體手術%超聲乳化術%晶狀體切除術%增生性糖尿病視網膜病變%白內障
파리체수술%초성유화술%정상체절제술%증생성당뇨병시망막병변%백내장
Vitrectomy%Phacoemusification%Lensectomy%Proliferative diabetic retinopathy%Cataract
目的:评价晶体切除术和超声乳化吸除术联合玻璃体切除术治疗白内障合并糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)患者的临床疗效。方法83例(90眼)PDR患者随机分为两组,其中A组42例(44眼)采用玻璃体切除联合晶状体切除术治疗,B组41例(46眼)采用玻璃体切除联合超声乳化吸除术治疗,观察两组的手术疗效。结果术前术后A组和B组视力总体平均值均得到显著性改善(P<0.05),且B组患者术后视力改善眼数和视力总体平均值明显大于A组患者(P<0.05)。A组的虹膜新生血管(INV)发生率(20.45%vs 2.17%)和囊膜混浊发生率(31.82%vs 6.52%)明显高于B组(P<0.05)。两组患者其他并发症经对症治疗后均得以恢复。结论玻璃体切除联合超声乳化吸除术治疗白内障合并PDR患者术后视力改善效果优于玻璃体切除联合晶状体切除术,术后并发症和INV发生率更低,值得在临床上广泛应用。
目的:評價晶體切除術和超聲乳化吸除術聯閤玻璃體切除術治療白內障閤併糖尿病視網膜病變(PDR)患者的臨床療效。方法83例(90眼)PDR患者隨機分為兩組,其中A組42例(44眼)採用玻璃體切除聯閤晶狀體切除術治療,B組41例(46眼)採用玻璃體切除聯閤超聲乳化吸除術治療,觀察兩組的手術療效。結果術前術後A組和B組視力總體平均值均得到顯著性改善(P<0.05),且B組患者術後視力改善眼數和視力總體平均值明顯大于A組患者(P<0.05)。A組的虹膜新生血管(INV)髮生率(20.45%vs 2.17%)和囊膜混濁髮生率(31.82%vs 6.52%)明顯高于B組(P<0.05)。兩組患者其他併髮癥經對癥治療後均得以恢複。結論玻璃體切除聯閤超聲乳化吸除術治療白內障閤併PDR患者術後視力改善效果優于玻璃體切除聯閤晶狀體切除術,術後併髮癥和INV髮生率更低,值得在臨床上廣汎應用。
목적:평개정체절제술화초성유화흡제술연합파리체절제술치료백내장합병당뇨병시망막병변(PDR)환자적림상료효。방법83례(90안)PDR환자수궤분위량조,기중A조42례(44안)채용파리체절제연합정상체절제술치료,B조41례(46안)채용파리체절제연합초성유화흡제술치료,관찰량조적수술료효。결과술전술후A조화B조시력총체평균치균득도현저성개선(P<0.05),차B조환자술후시력개선안수화시력총체평균치명현대우A조환자(P<0.05)。A조적홍막신생혈관(INV)발생솔(20.45%vs 2.17%)화낭막혼탁발생솔(31.82%vs 6.52%)명현고우B조(P<0.05)。량조환자기타병발증경대증치료후균득이회복。결론파리체절제연합초성유화흡제술치료백내장합병PDR환자술후시력개선효과우우파리체절제연합정상체절제술,술후병발증화INV발생솔경저,치득재림상상엄범응용。
Objective To investigate the efficacy of lensectomy or phacoemulsification combined with vitrectomy in the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy and cataract. Methods Eighty-three patients (90 eyes) with PDR and cataract were randomly divided into two groups:group A (42 patients, 44 eyes) and group B (41 patients, 46 eyes). Group A was treated by lensectomy combined with vitrectomy, and group B was treated by phacoemulsification combined with vitrectomy. The clinical efficacy of two groups were observed and compared. Results The improvement in visual acuity of two groups were significant (P<0.05), and the improvement in group B was more significant than that in group A (P<0.05). The rates of iris neovascularization (INV) and capsular opacities of group A were significantly higher than those of group B (20.45%vs 2.17%, 31.82%vs 6.52%, P<0.05). Other com-plications in the two groups were cured after symptomatic treatment. Conclusion Phacoemusification combined with vitrectomy is more effective than lensectomy combined with vitrectomy in the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy and cataract. With low incidence of complications and INV, which is worthy of clinical promotion.