中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRIMARY MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2014年
10期
1483-1484,1485
,共3页
牙制备%牙科粘固剂%牙冠(假体)金属%粘固作用
牙製備%牙科粘固劑%牙冠(假體)金屬%粘固作用
아제비%아과점고제%아관(가체)금속%점고작용
Tooth preparation%Dental cements%Crowns%Metals%Cementation
目的:了解牙体预备及不同黏接剂对金属全冠黏固效果的影响,为全冠修复的临床操作提供研究依据。方法将60颗离体磨牙采用简单随机化法随机分为六组,每组10颗。每组采用的黏接材料不同或牙体预备的轴壁聚合度不同,分别为磷酸锌3度聚合组、玻璃离子3度聚合组、树脂水门汀3度聚合组、磷酸锌5度聚合组、玻璃离子5度聚合组、树脂水门汀5度聚合组。以上前三组牙备轴壁聚合度为3度,后三组牙备轴壁聚合度为5度。测试和比较每组的的固位力值。结果磷酸锌3度聚合组金属全冠固位力为(198.5±11.6)N,显著优于磷酸锌5度聚合组(138.2±14.1)N(t=7.46,P<0.05)。玻璃离子组和树脂水门汀组牙体预备轴壁聚合度3度或5度金属全冠固位力差异均无统计学意义(t=1.52、2.03,均P>0.05)。聚合度为3度组磷酸锌黏接固位力是(198.5±11.6) N,玻璃离子和树脂水门汀分别是(302.7±19.2) N和(352.7±21.8)N;聚合度为5度组磷酸锌黏接固位力是(138.2±14.1) N,玻璃离子和树脂水门汀分别为(317.4±23.8)N和(362.9±22.6)N,无论是何种牙备不同黏接剂金属全冠的固位力差异均有统计学意义(F=7.88、8.42,均P<0.05)。结论选择合适的黏接剂,规范操作才可获得最佳的黏固效果,提高临床修复效果。
目的:瞭解牙體預備及不同黏接劑對金屬全冠黏固效果的影響,為全冠脩複的臨床操作提供研究依據。方法將60顆離體磨牙採用簡單隨機化法隨機分為六組,每組10顆。每組採用的黏接材料不同或牙體預備的軸壁聚閤度不同,分彆為燐痠鋅3度聚閤組、玻璃離子3度聚閤組、樹脂水門汀3度聚閤組、燐痠鋅5度聚閤組、玻璃離子5度聚閤組、樹脂水門汀5度聚閤組。以上前三組牙備軸壁聚閤度為3度,後三組牙備軸壁聚閤度為5度。測試和比較每組的的固位力值。結果燐痠鋅3度聚閤組金屬全冠固位力為(198.5±11.6)N,顯著優于燐痠鋅5度聚閤組(138.2±14.1)N(t=7.46,P<0.05)。玻璃離子組和樹脂水門汀組牙體預備軸壁聚閤度3度或5度金屬全冠固位力差異均無統計學意義(t=1.52、2.03,均P>0.05)。聚閤度為3度組燐痠鋅黏接固位力是(198.5±11.6) N,玻璃離子和樹脂水門汀分彆是(302.7±19.2) N和(352.7±21.8)N;聚閤度為5度組燐痠鋅黏接固位力是(138.2±14.1) N,玻璃離子和樹脂水門汀分彆為(317.4±23.8)N和(362.9±22.6)N,無論是何種牙備不同黏接劑金屬全冠的固位力差異均有統計學意義(F=7.88、8.42,均P<0.05)。結論選擇閤適的黏接劑,規範操作纔可穫得最佳的黏固效果,提高臨床脩複效果。
목적:료해아체예비급불동점접제대금속전관점고효과적영향,위전관수복적림상조작제공연구의거。방법장60과리체마아채용간단수궤화법수궤분위륙조,매조10과。매조채용적점접재료불동혹아체예비적축벽취합도불동,분별위린산자3도취합조、파리리자3도취합조、수지수문정3도취합조、린산자5도취합조、파리리자5도취합조、수지수문정5도취합조。이상전삼조아비축벽취합도위3도,후삼조아비축벽취합도위5도。측시화비교매조적적고위력치。결과린산자3도취합조금속전관고위력위(198.5±11.6)N,현저우우린산자5도취합조(138.2±14.1)N(t=7.46,P<0.05)。파리리자조화수지수문정조아체예비축벽취합도3도혹5도금속전관고위력차이균무통계학의의(t=1.52、2.03,균P>0.05)。취합도위3도조린산자점접고위력시(198.5±11.6) N,파리리자화수지수문정분별시(302.7±19.2) N화(352.7±21.8)N;취합도위5도조린산자점접고위력시(138.2±14.1) N,파리리자화수지수문정분별위(317.4±23.8)N화(362.9±22.6)N,무론시하충아비불동점접제금속전관적고위력차이균유통계학의의(F=7.88、8.42,균P<0.05)。결론선택합괄적점접제,규범조작재가획득최가적점고효과,제고림상수복효과。
Objective To find out the effect of tooth preparation and bonding agents on cementation of metal full crown,to provide research basis for clinical practice of full crown restoration .Methods 60 dissociation teeth were randomly divided into six groups ,10 teeth in each group .Different adhesive materials or different polymerization angle were used in different groups ,the six groups were 3 polymerization angle zinc group ,3 polymerization angle glass ionomer group,3 polymerization angle resin cement group ,5 polymerization angle zinc group ,5 polymerization angle glass ionomer group ,and 5 polymerization angle resin cement group .In the first three groups ,polymerization angle was 3,and in the latter three groups ,polymerization angle was 5.The retentive force values of all groups were tested and compared.Results The metal crown retentive force of 3 polymerization angle zinc group[(198.5 ±11.6)N]was sig-nificantly better than that of 5 polymerization angle zinc group[(138.2 ±14.1)N](t=7.46,P<0.05).Polymeriza-tion angle showed no statistically significant effect on metal crown retentive force values of glass ionomer groups and resin cement groups (t=1.52,2.03,all P>0.05).Bonding zinc retention of 3 degree of polymerization group was (198.5 ±11.6)N,glass ionomer and resin cements were (302.7 ±19.2) N and (352.7 ±21.8) N.Bonding zinc retention of 5 degree of polymerization group was (138.2 ±14.1)N,glass ionomer and resin cements were (317.4 ± 23.8)N and (362.9 ±22.6) N.Different adhesives showed statistically significant effects on metal crown retentive force values of 3 polymerization angle groups and 5 polymerization angle groups (F=7.88,8.42,all P<0.05). Conclusion A suitable adhesive,standard operation can get the best cementation effect ,and improve clinical repair effect.