中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRIMARY MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2014年
10期
1441-1442,1443
,共3页
徐金义%吴蕊%王庆义%王文涛%李涵
徐金義%吳蕊%王慶義%王文濤%李涵
서금의%오예%왕경의%왕문도%리함
超声心动描记术,经食管%心室%预激综合征
超聲心動描記術,經食管%心室%預激綜閤徵
초성심동묘기술,경식관%심실%예격종합정
Echocardiography,transesophageal%Heart ventricles%Pre-excitation syndromes
目的:探讨食管心房调搏宽QRS波与隐性心室预激的相关性。方法将77例行食管心房调搏检查(TEAP)的患者根据心电图结果不同分为两组,Ⅰ组45例患者心电图正常,经心内电生理检查(EPS)排除存在隐性心室预激;Ⅱ组32例患者心电图显性心室预激,并经EPS证实。Ⅰ组患者TEAP显示电脉冲波( S波)后间断或连续呈宽 QRS 波群图形,并测量 SR 间期,同时与Ⅱ组患者的 TEAP 进行对比分析。结果(1)Ⅰ组患者中20例(ⅠA组)为心室起搏,TEAP究其图形显示S波后紧随宽大QRS波群呈右束支阻滞图形,SR为0 s;25例(ⅠB组)SR间期不固定,SR为(0.07±0.01)s,S波与QRS波无关,为室性期前收缩,QRS波群形态据期前收缩起源点不同而不同。(2)Ⅱ组患者TEAP检查过程中S波后有紧密相关的心房除极P波,经过较正常缩短的房室传导时间后出现起始有预激波的宽大 QRS波群,SR间期固定,SR为(0.08±0.03)s,同时不同部位旁道QRS波群有不同形态特征。(3)ⅠA组与ⅠB组、Ⅱ组SR间期差异有统计学意义(t=2.97、3.02,均P<0.05);而ⅠB组与Ⅱ组SR间期差异无统计学意义(t=2.66,P>0.05)。结论当食管心房调搏检查起搏宽QRS波群时,应综合分析,不应盲目认为是隐性预激旁道,避免给患者带来误诊治。
目的:探討食管心房調搏寬QRS波與隱性心室預激的相關性。方法將77例行食管心房調搏檢查(TEAP)的患者根據心電圖結果不同分為兩組,Ⅰ組45例患者心電圖正常,經心內電生理檢查(EPS)排除存在隱性心室預激;Ⅱ組32例患者心電圖顯性心室預激,併經EPS證實。Ⅰ組患者TEAP顯示電脈遲波( S波)後間斷或連續呈寬 QRS 波群圖形,併測量 SR 間期,同時與Ⅱ組患者的 TEAP 進行對比分析。結果(1)Ⅰ組患者中20例(ⅠA組)為心室起搏,TEAP究其圖形顯示S波後緊隨寬大QRS波群呈右束支阻滯圖形,SR為0 s;25例(ⅠB組)SR間期不固定,SR為(0.07±0.01)s,S波與QRS波無關,為室性期前收縮,QRS波群形態據期前收縮起源點不同而不同。(2)Ⅱ組患者TEAP檢查過程中S波後有緊密相關的心房除極P波,經過較正常縮短的房室傳導時間後齣現起始有預激波的寬大 QRS波群,SR間期固定,SR為(0.08±0.03)s,同時不同部位徬道QRS波群有不同形態特徵。(3)ⅠA組與ⅠB組、Ⅱ組SR間期差異有統計學意義(t=2.97、3.02,均P<0.05);而ⅠB組與Ⅱ組SR間期差異無統計學意義(t=2.66,P>0.05)。結論噹食管心房調搏檢查起搏寬QRS波群時,應綜閤分析,不應盲目認為是隱性預激徬道,避免給患者帶來誤診治。
목적:탐토식관심방조박관QRS파여은성심실예격적상관성。방법장77례행식관심방조박검사(TEAP)적환자근거심전도결과불동분위량조,Ⅰ조45례환자심전도정상,경심내전생리검사(EPS)배제존재은성심실예격;Ⅱ조32례환자심전도현성심실예격,병경EPS증실。Ⅰ조환자TEAP현시전맥충파( S파)후간단혹련속정관 QRS 파군도형,병측량 SR 간기,동시여Ⅱ조환자적 TEAP 진행대비분석。결과(1)Ⅰ조환자중20례(ⅠA조)위심실기박,TEAP구기도형현시S파후긴수관대QRS파군정우속지조체도형,SR위0 s;25례(ⅠB조)SR간기불고정,SR위(0.07±0.01)s,S파여QRS파무관,위실성기전수축,QRS파군형태거기전수축기원점불동이불동。(2)Ⅱ조환자TEAP검사과정중S파후유긴밀상관적심방제겁P파,경과교정상축단적방실전도시간후출현기시유예격파적관대 QRS파군,SR간기고정,SR위(0.08±0.03)s,동시불동부위방도QRS파군유불동형태특정。(3)ⅠA조여ⅠB조、Ⅱ조SR간기차이유통계학의의(t=2.97、3.02,균P<0.05);이ⅠB조여Ⅱ조SR간기차이무통계학의의(t=2.66,P>0.05)。결론당식관심방조박검사기박관QRS파군시,응종합분석,불응맹목인위시은성예격방도,피면급환자대래오진치。
Objective To explore the correlation between wide QRS of transesophageal atrial pacing (TEAP) and implicit ventricular pre-excitation.Methods 77 patients tested by TEAP were divided into two groups according to the ECG results .45 patients in group Ⅰhad normal electrocardiogram .32 patients in group Ⅱhad ven-tricular pre-excitation.In group Ⅰ,TEAP results showed that electric pulse wave (S wave) was followed by intermit-tent or continuous wide QRS complex .At the same time , the results of group Ⅰ were compared with the results of groupⅡ.Results (1)The patients of group Ⅰwere excluded the presence of concealed accessory pathway by intra-cavitary electrocardiographic test,among them 20 patients (group ⅠA) were ventricular pacing,the test results dis-played that S wave was followed by wide QRS complex exhibiting a pattern of right bundle branch block ( RBBB) ,SR interval was 0 s;SR intervals of 25 patients (groupⅠB) were not fixed,SR interval was (0.07 ±0.01)s,S wave had no concern with QRS wave ,the wide QRS complex was premature ventricular contraction ,QRS wave shapes were dif-ferent according to the different sites of pacing origin .(2)In groupⅡ,the test results displayed that S wave was close-ly followed by the atrial depolarization wave P ,and there was a wide QRS complex with pre-excitation wave at the be-ginning after a atrioventricular conduction time shorter than normal ,SR interval was fixed ,SR interval was (0.08 ±0. 03)s,at the same time,different parts of accessory pathway QRS complex had different morphological characteristics . (3) SR interval of ⅠA group compared with groupⅠB and groupⅡ,the differences were statistically significant ( t=2.97,3.02,all P<0.05);SR interval had no statistically significant difference between group ⅠB and groupⅡ(t=2.66,P>0.05).Conclusion When TEAP displaying pacing wide QRS complex ,in order to avoid bringing misdiag-nosis,TEAP results should be analyzed comprehensively rather than blindly believing that the reason was concealed accessory pathway .