海南医学
海南醫學
해남의학
HAINAN MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
10期
1427-1428
,共2页
老年%轻度认知功能障碍%痴呆%因素
老年%輕度認知功能障礙%癡呆%因素
노년%경도인지공능장애%치태%인소
Elderly%Mild cognitive impairment%Dementia%Factors
目的：探讨老年轻度认知功能障碍(Mild cognitive impairment，MCI)发生的相关因素。方法50例老年MCI患者纳入MCI组，50例与MCI年龄、性别相匹配的未合并MCI的老年人纳入对照组，比较两组研究对象的临床资料并进行统计学分析。结果 MCI组患者学历在高中以上者比例为20%、职业为脑力劳动者比例为26%、居住方式为独居者比例为28%、有脑卒中病史者占34%、合并高血压者占58%、糖尿病者占40%，SDS评分为(44.2±7.3)分、TG为(2.04±0.41) mmol/L、TC为(6.18±0.81) mmol/L，对照组分别为36%、46%、12%、14%、38%、22%、(38.5±6.4)分、(1.53±0.32) mmol/L、(5.22±0.67) mmol/L，上述指标在两组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论老年MCI的发生与独居、脑卒中病史、合并高血压、糖尿病高脂血症及抑郁症有关，而文化程度高及脑力劳动是其保护性因素。
目的：探討老年輕度認知功能障礙(Mild cognitive impairment，MCI)髮生的相關因素。方法50例老年MCI患者納入MCI組，50例與MCI年齡、性彆相匹配的未閤併MCI的老年人納入對照組，比較兩組研究對象的臨床資料併進行統計學分析。結果 MCI組患者學歷在高中以上者比例為20%、職業為腦力勞動者比例為26%、居住方式為獨居者比例為28%、有腦卒中病史者佔34%、閤併高血壓者佔58%、糖尿病者佔40%，SDS評分為(44.2±7.3)分、TG為(2.04±0.41) mmol/L、TC為(6.18±0.81) mmol/L，對照組分彆為36%、46%、12%、14%、38%、22%、(38.5±6.4)分、(1.53±0.32) mmol/L、(5.22±0.67) mmol/L，上述指標在兩組間差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論老年MCI的髮生與獨居、腦卒中病史、閤併高血壓、糖尿病高脂血癥及抑鬱癥有關，而文化程度高及腦力勞動是其保護性因素。
목적：탐토노년경도인지공능장애(Mild cognitive impairment，MCI)발생적상관인소。방법50례노년MCI환자납입MCI조，50례여MCI년령、성별상필배적미합병MCI적노년인납입대조조，비교량조연구대상적림상자료병진행통계학분석。결과 MCI조환자학력재고중이상자비례위20%、직업위뇌력노동자비례위26%、거주방식위독거자비례위28%、유뇌졸중병사자점34%、합병고혈압자점58%、당뇨병자점40%，SDS평분위(44.2±7.3)분、TG위(2.04±0.41) mmol/L、TC위(6.18±0.81) mmol/L，대조조분별위36%、46%、12%、14%、38%、22%、(38.5±6.4)분、(1.53±0.32) mmol/L、(5.22±0.67) mmol/L，상술지표재량조간차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론노년MCI적발생여독거、뇌졸중병사、합병고혈압、당뇨병고지혈증급억욱증유관，이문화정도고급뇌력노동시기보호성인소。
Objective To investigate the related factors of mild cognitive impairment in elderly person. Methods Selected 50 elderly patients with MCI to be the MCI group,and 50 elderly people without MCI in age and sex-matched with MCI to be the control group.At the end of study,the clinical data were compared and analyzed for statistically. Results In the MCI group, the proportion of education≥senior middle school was 20%, the proportion of mental occupation was 26%, and living alone mode was 28%, with a history of stroke was 34%, 58%with hypertension, diabetes accounted for 40%, the SDS score was (44.2±7.3), the level of TG was (2.04±0.41) mmol/L, TC was (6.18±0.81) mmol/L, and that in the con-trol group was 36%, 46%, 12%, 14%, 38%, 22%, (38.5 ± 6.4), (1.53 ± 0.32) mmol/L, (5.22±0.67) mmol/L, these indicators revealed statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion The related factors of MCI in the elderly include living alone, history of stroke, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and depression, whereas high levels of education and mental are the protective factors.
