临床超声医学杂志
臨床超聲醫學雜誌
림상초성의학잡지
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN CLINICAL M,EDICINE
2014年
5期
310-312
,共3页
马穗红%龚渭冰%吴凤林%李颖嘉%罗国新%柳建华
馬穗紅%龔渭冰%吳鳳林%李穎嘉%囉國新%柳建華
마수홍%공위빙%오봉림%리영가%라국신%류건화
超声检查%造影剂%移植肾动脉狭窄%时间-强度曲线
超聲檢查%造影劑%移植腎動脈狹窄%時間-彊度麯線
초성검사%조영제%이식신동맥협착%시간-강도곡선
Ultrasonography%Contrast agent%Transplanted renal artery stenosis%Time-intensity curve
目的:探讨使用超声造影和声学密度定量技术在观察移植肾动脉主干不同狭窄程度中的应用价值。方法经数字减影血管造影确诊的18例移植肾动脉狭窄(TRAS)患者(TRAS组)和18例未见异常的移植肾患者(对照组),应用彩色多普勒超声(CDFI)及超声造影对其进行观察,并比较两组时间-强度曲线(TIC)的差异。结果 CDFI示TRAS组管腔狭窄范围及狭窄程度均小于超声造影所见;对照组TIC曲线呈滑梯状,而TRAS组曲线呈抛物线改变;与对照组比较,TRAS组TIC曲线下降支斜率(ALPHA)、达峰时间(TTP)增高,曲线下面积(AUC)、达峰强度绝对值(DPI)降低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),其中以AUC的差异最为显著。结论超声造影能够直观完整地显示移植肾动脉及移植肾内的血流分布,同时进行声学密度定量分析,通过TIC辅助分析移植肾的血流灌注状态,为临床评估TRAS提供新的佐证。
目的:探討使用超聲造影和聲學密度定量技術在觀察移植腎動脈主榦不同狹窄程度中的應用價值。方法經數字減影血管造影確診的18例移植腎動脈狹窄(TRAS)患者(TRAS組)和18例未見異常的移植腎患者(對照組),應用綵色多普勒超聲(CDFI)及超聲造影對其進行觀察,併比較兩組時間-彊度麯線(TIC)的差異。結果 CDFI示TRAS組管腔狹窄範圍及狹窄程度均小于超聲造影所見;對照組TIC麯線呈滑梯狀,而TRAS組麯線呈拋物線改變;與對照組比較,TRAS組TIC麯線下降支斜率(ALPHA)、達峰時間(TTP)增高,麯線下麵積(AUC)、達峰彊度絕對值(DPI)降低,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05),其中以AUC的差異最為顯著。結論超聲造影能夠直觀完整地顯示移植腎動脈及移植腎內的血流分佈,同時進行聲學密度定量分析,通過TIC輔助分析移植腎的血流灌註狀態,為臨床評估TRAS提供新的佐證。
목적:탐토사용초성조영화성학밀도정량기술재관찰이식신동맥주간불동협착정도중적응용개치。방법경수자감영혈관조영학진적18례이식신동맥협착(TRAS)환자(TRAS조)화18례미견이상적이식신환자(대조조),응용채색다보륵초성(CDFI)급초성조영대기진행관찰,병비교량조시간-강도곡선(TIC)적차이。결과 CDFI시TRAS조관강협착범위급협착정도균소우초성조영소견;대조조TIC곡선정활제상,이TRAS조곡선정포물선개변;여대조조비교,TRAS조TIC곡선하강지사솔(ALPHA)、체봉시간(TTP)증고,곡선하면적(AUC)、체봉강도절대치(DPI)강저,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05),기중이AUC적차이최위현저。결론초성조영능구직관완정지현시이식신동맥급이식신내적혈류분포,동시진행성학밀도정량분석,통과TIC보조분석이식신적혈류관주상태,위림상평고TRAS제공신적좌증。
Objective To assess the application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and the acoustic densitometry (AD) quantitative analysis technology in observing different narrow degree of transplanted kidney(TK) arterial main force . Methods Diagnosed by digital subtraction angiography , 18 transplanted renal artery stenosis (TRAS) patients (TRAS group) and 18 transplanted renal patient without artery stenosis(control group) were observed using CDFI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound technique,and time-intensity curves (TIC) of different degree of stenosis difference was compared. Results TRAS narrowing range and degree were less detected using CDFI than contrast-enhanced ultrasound,TIC curve was shown as a slide type in normal group,while parabolic type in TRAS group,ALPHA and time to peak increased,while area under curve and derived peak intensity decreased in TRAS group compared with control group(P<0.05),in which the difference of area under curve was the most significant. Conclusion Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and AD quantitative analysis technology can display the bloodstream in transplanted kidney and renal arterial intuitively with assistant analysis of TIC,which can provide a new evidence for clinic evaluation of TRAS.