CAJ | 학술논문

随机抽取贵州某高校204名大学一年级学生作为实验对象，通过运用不相等同参照组前后实验测试比较设计等方法，检验了三种不同户外安全教育模式对大学生户外安全知信行的干预效果。实验结果：（1）“户外安全实践体育课程模式”干预后，学生户外安全知信行各评价指标均有明显提高，且其效果优于实验对照组和专题组及技能组；（2）“户外安全专题宣讲教育模式”干预后，只有户外安全有关理论知识有显著改善；（3）“户外安全技能教学模式”干预后，户外安全理论知识和技能均有显著改善，但未能达到较为显著的效果。试验结论：高校大学生户外安全的三种教育模式中，户外安全实践体育课程教育模式效果最为显著，其余两种模式各有千秋或存在不足之处。
수궤추취귀주모고교204명대학일년급학생작위실험대상，통과운용불상등동삼조조전후실험측시비교설계등방법，검험료삼충불동호외안전교육모식대대학생호외안전지신행적간예효과。실험결과：（1）“호외안전실천체육과정모식”간예후，학생호외안전지신행각평개지표균유명현제고，차기효과우우실험대조조화전제조급기능조；（2）“호외안전전제선강교육모식”간예후，지유호외안전유관이론지식유현저개선；（3）“호외안전기능교학모식”간예후，호외안전이론지식화기능균유현저개선，단미능체도교위현저적효과。시험결론：고교대학생호외안전적삼충교육모식중，호외안전실천체육과정교육모식효과최위현저，기여량충모식각유천추혹존재불족지처。
This study randomly selected 204 college of guizhou a university first-year students as subjects, using unequal design methods such as comparison with a control group before and after the experiment test, test the three different outdoor safety education mode for university students outdoor security XinHang intervention effect. Re-sults:(1) “outdoor safety practice mode of physical edu-cation curriculum” after the intervention, students know outdoor security XinHang each evaluation index were im-proved obviously,and its effect is better than that of con- trol group and task forces and skill set;( 2 ) “outdoor se-curity project about education model” after the interven-tion,only outdoor security can improve the relevant theo-retical knowledge;( 3 ) “outdoor safety skills teaching mode” after the intervention, outdoor security theory knowledge and skills have improved significantly, but failed to achieve more significant effect. Test conclusion:the college students of three outdoor security education mode,the outdoor security practice is the most significant effect of PE education mode, the rest of the two models come in or exist deficiencies.