风机技术
風機技術
풍궤기술
COMPRESSOR,BLOWER & FAN TECHNOLOGY
2014年
3期
13-21
,共9页
赵会晶%王志恒%孙晔晨%樊宏周%席光
趙會晶%王誌恆%孫曄晨%樊宏週%席光
조회정%왕지항%손엽신%번굉주%석광
湍流模型%Krain%叶轮%流场%总体性能
湍流模型%Krain%葉輪%流場%總體性能
단류모형%Krain%협륜%류장%총체성능
turbulence model%Krain%impeller%flow field%overall performance
为研究不同湍流模型对压缩机总体性能及内部流场数值模拟结果的影响,本文采用3个高雷诺数湍流模型和1个低雷诺数湍流模型对Krain实验研究的离心叶轮和等面积无叶扩压器进行三维定常流场计算,并与相应的实验结果进行对比。研究结果表明,4种湍流模型的数值模拟结果与实验结果均存在差异,这一差异与流量和转速有关。在高转速、小流量工况下,湍流模型对数值模拟结果的影响更为显著。数值模拟预测到的失速流量均与实验值差别较大。而从流场和总体性能两方面来看,与高雷诺数湍流模型相比,低雷诺数湍流模型的模拟精度更高,在设计工况附近区域,数值模拟的效率与实验符合良好。
為研究不同湍流模型對壓縮機總體性能及內部流場數值模擬結果的影響,本文採用3箇高雷諾數湍流模型和1箇低雷諾數湍流模型對Krain實驗研究的離心葉輪和等麵積無葉擴壓器進行三維定常流場計算,併與相應的實驗結果進行對比。研究結果錶明,4種湍流模型的數值模擬結果與實驗結果均存在差異,這一差異與流量和轉速有關。在高轉速、小流量工況下,湍流模型對數值模擬結果的影響更為顯著。數值模擬預測到的失速流量均與實驗值差彆較大。而從流場和總體性能兩方麵來看,與高雷諾數湍流模型相比,低雷諾數湍流模型的模擬精度更高,在設計工況附近區域,數值模擬的效率與實驗符閤良好。
위연구불동단류모형대압축궤총체성능급내부류장수치모의결과적영향,본문채용3개고뢰낙수단류모형화1개저뢰낙수단류모형대Krain실험연구적리심협륜화등면적무협확압기진행삼유정상류장계산,병여상응적실험결과진행대비。연구결과표명,4충단류모형적수치모의결과여실험결과균존재차이,저일차이여류량화전속유관。재고전속、소류량공황하,단류모형대수치모의결과적영향경위현저。수치모의예측도적실속류량균여실험치차별교대。이종류장화총체성능량방면래간,여고뢰낙수단류모형상비,저뢰낙수단류모형적모의정도경고,재설계공황부근구역,수치모의적효솔여실험부합량호。
In order to study the effects of different turbulence models on the predicted overall performance and flow field in the compressor, the 3D steady flow simulations were carried out on the Krain impeller and a vaneless diffuser of constant area by using three different high Reynolds number turbulence models and one low Reynolds number turbulence model. The numerical results were compared with the corresponding experimental results. The results show that, the numerical results of the four turbulence models don’t agree fully well with the experimental results, and the differences among them vary with both the mass flowrate and the rotation speed. The impacts of turbulence models on numerical results behave more significantly at the high-speed and low-flowrate operating points. The predicted stall points all departure from the experimental results. In terms of both the flow field and overall performance, the low Reynolds number turbulence model provides more accurate results than the high Reynolds number turbulence models do. Near the design operating condition, the predicted efficiencies by the numerical simulations are in good agreement with the experiment tested results.