中国继续医学教育
中國繼續醫學教育
중국계속의학교육
CHINA CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION
2014年
1期
8-9
,共2页
冠状动脉疾病%ATP%腺苷%血流储备分数
冠狀動脈疾病%ATP%腺苷%血流儲備分數
관상동맥질병%ATP%선감%혈류저비분수
Coronary artery disease%ATP%Adenosine%Fractional lfow reserve
目的:探讨静脉泵入三磷酸腺苷(ATP)。方法选取2012年1月~2013年3月某院收治并行冠状动脉造影与FFR测定患者共32例25处病变,行腺苷测定FFR后行ATP测定,同时监测心电图、心率、主动脉压、获取有效FFR时间等指标,统计患者不适症状,分别就两组指标对比。结果测定均获得成功, QCA平均直径狭窄程度62%至84%,平均(74.61±4.26)%,获得腺苷负荷与ATP负荷下FFR值分别为(0.804±0.028)与(0.804±0.026),获得QCA与腺苷与ATP测定FFR相关系数分别为-0.942、-0.937呈高度负相关;两组FFR结果相关系数1.0034,呈高度正相关;两种负荷测定时均出现17例不适,差异不具备统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论采用外周静脉注射ATP负荷行FFR测定效用与腺苷负荷效用基本相同,可采用ATP替代。
目的:探討靜脈泵入三燐痠腺苷(ATP)。方法選取2012年1月~2013年3月某院收治併行冠狀動脈造影與FFR測定患者共32例25處病變,行腺苷測定FFR後行ATP測定,同時鑑測心電圖、心率、主動脈壓、穫取有效FFR時間等指標,統計患者不適癥狀,分彆就兩組指標對比。結果測定均穫得成功, QCA平均直徑狹窄程度62%至84%,平均(74.61±4.26)%,穫得腺苷負荷與ATP負荷下FFR值分彆為(0.804±0.028)與(0.804±0.026),穫得QCA與腺苷與ATP測定FFR相關繫數分彆為-0.942、-0.937呈高度負相關;兩組FFR結果相關繫數1.0034,呈高度正相關;兩種負荷測定時均齣現17例不適,差異不具備統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論採用外週靜脈註射ATP負荷行FFR測定效用與腺苷負荷效用基本相同,可採用ATP替代。
목적:탐토정맥빙입삼린산선감(ATP)。방법선취2012년1월~2013년3월모원수치병행관상동맥조영여FFR측정환자공32례25처병변,행선감측정FFR후행ATP측정,동시감측심전도、심솔、주동맥압、획취유효FFR시간등지표,통계환자불괄증상,분별취량조지표대비。결과측정균획득성공, QCA평균직경협착정도62%지84%,평균(74.61±4.26)%,획득선감부하여ATP부하하FFR치분별위(0.804±0.028)여(0.804±0.026),획득QCA여선감여ATP측정FFR상관계수분별위-0.942、-0.937정고도부상관;량조FFR결과상관계수1.0034,정고도정상관;량충부하측정시균출현17례불괄,차이불구비통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론채용외주정맥주사ATP부하행FFR측정효용여선감부하효용기본상동,가채용ATP체대。
Objective To investigate the intravenous infusion of adenosine triphosphate (ATP). Methods From January 2012 to March 2013 in a hospital were underwent coronary angiography and FFR were measured in 32 patients with 25 lesions, for determination of adenosine FFR followed by ATP assay, while monitoring the electrocardiogram, heart rate, pulse pressure, get effective active FFR time and other indicators, statistics the symptoms of patients, respectively, two groups of indicators contrast. Results The determination were successful, the QCA mean diameter stenosis 62%to 84%, averaged (74.61±4.26)%, obtain adenosine and ATP loads FFR values were (0.804±0.028) and (0.804±0.026), QCA and ATP determination of adenosine and FFR correlation coefifcients were-0.942,-0.937 was highly negative correlation;two groups of FFR results in a correlation coefifcient of 1.0034, showed a highly positive correlation;two kinds of load measurement showed 17 cases of discomfort, the difference was not statistically signiifcant (P>0.05). Conclusion The use of peripheral intravenous injection of ATP load and adenosine for FFR determination of utility is basically the same, can be replaced by ATP.