CAJ | 학술논문

目的比较中青年与老年面部创伤患者心理状态.方法采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、UCLA孤独量表等心理学量表对88例面部创伤患者的心理健康状况进行测量.结果中青年患者焦虑评分[(50.96±6.21)分]、抑郁指数[(0.58±0.06)]明显高于老年患者[(40.45±5.29)分,(0.44±0.04)](P<0.01),老年患者的孤独评分[(60.62±5.43)分]明显高于中青年患者[(38.22±6.64)分](P<0.01).结论不同年龄层次的面部创伤患者心理障碍情况有很大不同,在临床处理上应区别对待.
목적 비교중청년여노년면부창상환자심리상태.방법 채용초필자평량표(SAS)、억욱자평량표(SDS)、UCLA고독량표등심이학량표대88례면부창상환자적심리건강상황진행측량.결과 중청년환자초필평분[(50.96±6.21)분]、억욱지수[(0.58±0.06)]명현고우노년환자[(40.45±5.29)분,(0.44±0.04)](P<0.01),노년환자적고독평분[(60.62±5.43)분]명현고우중청년환자[(38.22±6.64)분](P<0.01).결론 불동년령층차적면부창상환자심리장애정황유흔대불동,재림상처리상응구별대대.
Objective To compare the difference of psychological health conditions between eldedy and young adult patients with facial soft tissue injury.Methods The SDS,SAS and UCLA loneliness scale were applied to 88 patients with facial soft tissue injury.Results The score of anxiety and depression index in young adult patients were significantly higher than that in elderly adult patients[(50.96±6.21)vs(40.45±5.29),P＜0.01;(0.58±0.06)vs(0.44±0.04),P＜0.01].However,the loneliness score was notably lower than that in elderly adult patients[(60.62±5.43)vs(38.22±6.64)](P＜0.01).Conclusion The facial injury patients of different ages suffered from different psychological symptoms and they should be treated differently.