临床肿瘤学杂志
臨床腫瘤學雜誌
림상종류학잡지
CHINESE CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
2014年
3期
255-257
,共3页
焦安娜%金建华%陆文斌%邓建忠%张华%刘允刚
焦安娜%金建華%陸文斌%鄧建忠%張華%劉允剛
초안나%금건화%륙문빈%산건충%장화%류윤강
晚期胃癌%培美曲塞%顺铂%化学治疗
晚期胃癌%培美麯塞%順鉑%化學治療
만기위암%배미곡새%순박%화학치료
Advanced gastric cancer%Pemetrexed%Cisplatin%Chemotherapy
目的:评价培美曲塞联合顺铂二线治疗晚期胃癌的疗效及不良反应。方法选取2011年12月至2013年2月46例一线化疗失败的晚期胃癌患者,给予培美曲塞联合顺铂二线治疗,具体为:培美曲塞500mg/m2静滴,d1;顺铂25mg/m2静滴,d1~d3;21天为1周期。根据RECIST 1?0版标准评价近期疗效并计算有效率( RR)和疾病控制率( DCR),同时采用NCI CTC 3?0标准评价毒副反应,随访无进展生存期( PFS)和总生存期( OS)。结果46例均可评价近期疗效,其中无完全缓解病例,部分缓解10例,稳定12例,进展24例,RR为21?7%,DCR为47?8%。随访3~20个月,中位PFS和OS分别为3?5个月和8?4个月。全组化疗后的KPS评分为(77?6±4?3)分,高于化疗前的(65?7±5?0)分(P<0?05),但化疗前后止痛药使用率的差异无统计学意义( P>0?05)。主要毒副反应为1~3级骨髓抑制和胃肠道不良反应,4级毒副反应发生率极低,仅1例4级白细胞减少;2例1级肝功能异常;患者均无肾功能异常、发热、皮疹及化疗相关性死亡。结论培美曲塞联合顺铂二线治疗晚期胃癌的疗效较好,且毒副反应轻,耐受性好。
目的:評價培美麯塞聯閤順鉑二線治療晚期胃癌的療效及不良反應。方法選取2011年12月至2013年2月46例一線化療失敗的晚期胃癌患者,給予培美麯塞聯閤順鉑二線治療,具體為:培美麯塞500mg/m2靜滴,d1;順鉑25mg/m2靜滴,d1~d3;21天為1週期。根據RECIST 1?0版標準評價近期療效併計算有效率( RR)和疾病控製率( DCR),同時採用NCI CTC 3?0標準評價毒副反應,隨訪無進展生存期( PFS)和總生存期( OS)。結果46例均可評價近期療效,其中無完全緩解病例,部分緩解10例,穩定12例,進展24例,RR為21?7%,DCR為47?8%。隨訪3~20箇月,中位PFS和OS分彆為3?5箇月和8?4箇月。全組化療後的KPS評分為(77?6±4?3)分,高于化療前的(65?7±5?0)分(P<0?05),但化療前後止痛藥使用率的差異無統計學意義( P>0?05)。主要毒副反應為1~3級骨髓抑製和胃腸道不良反應,4級毒副反應髮生率極低,僅1例4級白細胞減少;2例1級肝功能異常;患者均無腎功能異常、髮熱、皮疹及化療相關性死亡。結論培美麯塞聯閤順鉑二線治療晚期胃癌的療效較好,且毒副反應輕,耐受性好。
목적:평개배미곡새연합순박이선치료만기위암적료효급불량반응。방법선취2011년12월지2013년2월46례일선화료실패적만기위암환자,급여배미곡새연합순박이선치료,구체위:배미곡새500mg/m2정적,d1;순박25mg/m2정적,d1~d3;21천위1주기。근거RECIST 1?0판표준평개근기료효병계산유효솔( RR)화질병공제솔( DCR),동시채용NCI CTC 3?0표준평개독부반응,수방무진전생존기( PFS)화총생존기( OS)。결과46례균가평개근기료효,기중무완전완해병례,부분완해10례,은정12례,진전24례,RR위21?7%,DCR위47?8%。수방3~20개월,중위PFS화OS분별위3?5개월화8?4개월。전조화료후적KPS평분위(77?6±4?3)분,고우화료전적(65?7±5?0)분(P<0?05),단화료전후지통약사용솔적차이무통계학의의( P>0?05)。주요독부반응위1~3급골수억제화위장도불량반응,4급독부반응발생솔겁저,부1례4급백세포감소;2례1급간공능이상;환자균무신공능이상、발열、피진급화료상관성사망。결론배미곡새연합순박이선치료만기위암적료효교호,차독부반응경,내수성호。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of pemetrexed combined with cisplatin as second-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer. Methods Forty-six patients with advanced gastric cancer who had previously failed to first-line chemotherapy from December 2011 to February 2013 received pemetrexed (500mg/m2 iv, d1) combined with cisplatin (25mg/m2 iv, d1-d3) as second-line treatment. Twenty-one days was a cycle. The response evaluation criteria in solid tumors ( RECIST) 1?0 was employed to evaluate the short-term efficacy and calculated the response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR). The toxicity was evaluated using NCI CTC 3?0 criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the date of follow-up. Results Forty-six patients were evaluable for short-term efficacy. There were 10 cases of partial response, 12 of stable disease and 24 of progressive disease with RR of 21?7%and DCR of 47?8%. The follow-up ranged from 3 to 20 months. The median PFS and OS were 3?5 and 8?4 months, re-spectively. The KPS was 77?6±4?3 after chemotherapy, higher than 65?7±5?0 before chemotherapy, but there was no significant differ-ence on painkiller usage before and after chemotherapy. The major side effects were grade 1-3 marrow toxicities and gastrointestinal re-sponse. The incidence of grade 4 side effect was rare with only one case of grade 4 leukopenia. Two cases were grade 1 abnormal liver function. There was no renal dysfunction, fever, rash and chemotherapy-related deaths. Conclusion Pemetrexed combined with cisplatin as second-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer showed a good effect with mild toxicities and good tolerance.