中外医学研究
中外醫學研究
중외의학연구
CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
2014年
6期
10-12
,共3页
腔内治疗%腹主动脉瘤
腔內治療%腹主動脈瘤
강내치료%복주동맥류
Endovascular treatment%Abdominal aortic aneurysm
目的：探讨采用腔内治疗对腹主动脉瘤的临床治疗效果。方法：采集笔者所在医院因腹主动脉瘤收治入院患者60例，按随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，其中对照组采用开放手术治疗，观察组采用腔内治疗，观察两组手术并发症、治疗等情况。结果：两组手术时间、出血量、异体输血量、ICU入住时间和住院时间比较，差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。观察组并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。在两组手术过程中，观察组对髂内动脉进行修补或重建者少于对照组，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论：经临床研究可见，观察组采用EVAR手术治疗效果明显优于对照组采用的OR手术治疗，值得临床推广应用。
目的：探討採用腔內治療對腹主動脈瘤的臨床治療效果。方法：採集筆者所在醫院因腹主動脈瘤收治入院患者60例，按隨機數字錶法分為對照組和觀察組，其中對照組採用開放手術治療，觀察組採用腔內治療，觀察兩組手術併髮癥、治療等情況。結果：兩組手術時間、齣血量、異體輸血量、ICU入住時間和住院時間比較，差異均有統計學意義(P<0.01)。觀察組併髮癥髮生率低于對照組(P<0.05)。在兩組手術過程中，觀察組對髂內動脈進行脩補或重建者少于對照組，差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論：經臨床研究可見，觀察組採用EVAR手術治療效果明顯優于對照組採用的OR手術治療，值得臨床推廣應用。
목적：탐토채용강내치료대복주동맥류적림상치료효과。방법：채집필자소재의원인복주동맥류수치입원환자60례，안수궤수자표법분위대조조화관찰조，기중대조조채용개방수술치료，관찰조채용강내치료，관찰량조수술병발증、치료등정황。결과：량조수술시간、출혈량、이체수혈량、ICU입주시간화주원시간비교，차이균유통계학의의(P<0.01)。관찰조병발증발생솔저우대조조(P<0.05)。재량조수술과정중，관찰조대가내동맥진행수보혹중건자소우대조조，차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론：경림상연구가견，관찰조채용EVAR수술치료효과명현우우대조조채용적OR수술치료，치득림상추엄응용。
Objective:To explore the clinical effect of intracavitary therapy in abdominal aortic aneurysm.Method:A total of 60 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm in our hospital were collected,and they were divided into the observation group and the control group by the random table,and patients in the control group were treated with open operation,and patients in the observation group were treated with intracavitary therapy,and complications and treatment of the two groups were observed.Result:The operation time,amount of bleeding,blood transfusion volume,ICU stay and hospital stay of the two groups were compared,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.01).The occurrence rate of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).During the operation,repair or reestablishment of internal iliac artery in the observation group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion:The clinical research showed that the curative effect of EVAR operation in the observation group was better than that of OR operation in the control group,and it is worthy of clinically applying.
