中医临床研究
中醫臨床研究
중의림상연구
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
2013年
15期
32-34
,共3页
稳心颗粒%胺碘酮%冠心病%心律失常
穩心顆粒%胺碘酮%冠心病%心律失常
은심과립%알전동%관심병%심률실상
Wenxin granule%Amiodarone%CAD%Arrhythmia
目的:探讨稳心颗粒联合胺碘酮治疗冠心病(CAD)心律失常的疗效和用药安全性。方法:将90例冠心病心律失常患者随机分为两组:观察组47例采用稳心颗粒合并胺碘酮治疗,对照组43例仅给予胺碘酮治疗。1个月为1个疗程,1个疗程后判定疗效,所有患者治疗前后均行心电图及24h动态心电图检查,观察治疗效果和主要不良反应。结果:治疗1个月后,观察组显效32例,有效12例,无效3例,总有效率为93.6%,对照组显效23例,有效13,无效7例,总有效率为83.7%,数据间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者治疗期间未见明显不良反应。结论:稳心颗粒联合胺碘酮治疗冠心病心律失常疗效优于单用胺碘酮,其疗效满意,不良反应少,优于临床推广。
目的:探討穩心顆粒聯閤胺碘酮治療冠心病(CAD)心律失常的療效和用藥安全性。方法:將90例冠心病心律失常患者隨機分為兩組:觀察組47例採用穩心顆粒閤併胺碘酮治療,對照組43例僅給予胺碘酮治療。1箇月為1箇療程,1箇療程後判定療效,所有患者治療前後均行心電圖及24h動態心電圖檢查,觀察治療效果和主要不良反應。結果:治療1箇月後,觀察組顯效32例,有效12例,無效3例,總有效率為93.6%,對照組顯效23例,有效13,無效7例,總有效率為83.7%,數據間差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。兩組患者治療期間未見明顯不良反應。結論:穩心顆粒聯閤胺碘酮治療冠心病心律失常療效優于單用胺碘酮,其療效滿意,不良反應少,優于臨床推廣。
목적:탐토은심과립연합알전동치료관심병(CAD)심률실상적료효화용약안전성。방법:장90례관심병심률실상환자수궤분위량조:관찰조47례채용은심과립합병알전동치료,대조조43례부급여알전동치료。1개월위1개료정,1개료정후판정료효,소유환자치료전후균행심전도급24h동태심전도검사,관찰치료효과화주요불량반응。결과:치료1개월후,관찰조현효32례,유효12례,무효3례,총유효솔위93.6%,대조조현효23례,유효13,무효7례,총유효솔위83.7%,수거간차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。량조환자치료기간미견명현불량반응。결론:은심과립연합알전동치료관심병심률실상료효우우단용알전동,기료효만의,불량반응소,우우림상추엄。
Objective:To investigate the medicine efficacy and safety of the Wenxin granule and amiodarone. Methods:90 patients were randomly divided into two groups. The observation group (47 cases) was treated with Wenxin granule and amiodarone, the control group of 43 patients only received amiodarone treatment. 1 month for 1 course of treatment, a course of treatment to determine efficacy, before and after treatment, all patients underwent Holter ECG and 24h, observed treatment effects and major adverse reactions. Results:After 1 month of treatment, the observation group 32 cases markedly effective, effective in 12 cases, 3 cases were ineffective, the total efficiency was 93.6%, in the control group, markedly effective in 23 cases, effective in 13 cases, 7 cases were ineffective, the total efficiency was 83.7%, a statistically significant difference between the data (P<0.05). During the two groups of patients showed no adverse reactions. Conclusion: The efficacy of Wenxin granule and amiodarone was superior to amiodarone alone, its results were satisfactory, fewer adverse reactions, worthy of clinical practice.