CAJ | 학술논문

目的：对比中医综合疗法与手术方法治疗踝关节骨折的临床疗效。方法：选取在我院骨科治疗踝关节骨折的患者58例，将其随机分成两组。观察组（n＝29）：采取中医综合方法治疗；对照组（n＝29）：采用手术方法治疗。结果：两组患者均在治疗后6～12个月进行随访，观察组患者踝关节功能恢复情况的优良率及X线检查骨折复位情况的优良率与对照组比较无明显差异，比较无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论：中医综合疗法与手术方法对踝关节骨折远期疗效相当，临床根据患者的一般情况，选择合适的治疗方法。
목적：대비중의종합요법여수술방법치료과관절골절적림상료효。방법：선취재아원골과치료과관절골절적환자58례，장기수궤분성량조。관찰조（n＝29）：채취중의종합방법치료；대조조（n＝29）：채용수술방법치료。결과：량조환자균재치료후6～12개월진행수방，관찰조환자과관절공능회복정황적우량솔급X선검사골절복위정황적우량솔여대조조비교무명현차이，비교무통계학의의（P>0.05）。결론：중의종합요법여수술방법대과관절골절원기료효상당，림상근거환자적일반정황，선택합괄적치료방법。
Objective:To compare the Clinical efficacy of integrated traditional Chinese medicine therapy and operation method in treating ankle fracture. Methods:58 cases in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups.29 cases in the observation group were treated with the comprehensive method of TCM; 29 cases in the control group were treated with operation method. Results: They were followed up for 6 to 12 months after treatment. There was no significant difference between the excellent rate of excellent and good rate and X-ray examination function recovery of fracture reduction compared with the control group, no statistical significance (P>0.05). Conclusion:Treating ankle fracture between comprehensive treatment and operation treatment of TCM therapeutic equivalence, the general condition of the patient, choose a suitable treatment method.