CAJ | 학술논문

　　目的探讨并对比左室急性心肌梗死后急诊介入治疗与择期介入治疗的疗效。方法将在我科治疗的120名左室急性心肌梗死患者分为2组，急诊组60例进行急诊PCI，择期组60例择期PCI手术治疗。观察手术效果和术后并发症等临床指标。结果急诊组痊愈率88.3%，优于常规组65.0%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论急诊介入治疗在左室急性心肌梗死治疗中比择期介入治疗更有效。
　　목적탐토병대비좌실급성심기경사후급진개입치료여택기개입치료적료효。방법장재아과치료적120명좌실급성심기경사환자분위2조，급진조60례진행급진PCI，택기조60례택기PCI수술치료。관찰수술효과화술후병발증등림상지표。결과급진조전유솔88.3%，우우상규조65.0%，차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。결론급진개입치료재좌실급성심기경사치료중비택기개입치료경유효。
Objective To investigate and compare the efficacy of left ventricular acute myocardial infarction after emergency percutaneous coronary intervention and elective interventional treatment. Methods In our department treated 120 left ventricular acute myocardial infarction were divided into two groups, emergency group of 60 patients, emergency PCI, elective group of 60 patients undergoing elective PCI surgical treatment. Observe the effect of surgery and post-operative complications, such as clinical indicators. Results Emergency group cure rate of 88.3%, 65.0%better than the conventional group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The emergency intervention more effectively than elective interventional treatment of left ventricular acute myocardial infarction.