CAJ | 학술논문

在重新审判＂发回＂死刑案件的司法实践中,对被告人容易存在有罪推定的倾向、依据补强证据再次适用死刑的倾向和漠视侦控行为合法性的倾向。为此重审法院应杜绝片面依据侦控机关提供的不利于被告人的存疑补强证据,对被告人再次适用死刑;对＂事实不清、证据不足＂发回的死刑案件,如果经过重审认定的案件事实没有发生重大变化,一般也不宜对被告人再次适用死刑。
재중신심판＂발회＂사형안건적사법실천중,대피고인용역존재유죄추정적경향、의거보강증거재차괄용사형적경향화막시정공행위합법성적경향。위차중심법원응두절편면의거정공궤관제공적불리우피고인적존의보강증거,대피고인재차괄용사형;대＂사실불청、증거불족＂발회적사형안건,여과경과중심인정적안건사실몰유발생중대변화,일반야불의대피고인재차괄용사형。
In the judicial practice of the retrial of the ＂Return＂cases of the death penalty review,there appears the tendency of the defendant to the presumption,the tendency of the corroborative evidence to apply the death penalty and the tendency of the ignoring the investigation and control of legality.As a result,the retrial court should put an end to the evidence offered by the investigation organs which is bad for the defendant,and apply the death penalty of the defendant;as the ＂facts are not clear,evidence are not enough＂ death penalty case,there should not be applied by the death penalty if the truth is not changed much.