CAJ | 학술논문

裁量性证据可采性认定模式可以解决司法体制运行中的诸多问题．其实美国证据制度改革之初就已经确立了裁量性的证据可采性认定模式，可以说裁量性证据可采性认定是美国证据法的重要内容。不过美国的裁量性证据可采性认定的百年历史中也出现了影响法的可预测性、损害司法公正、背离可采性规则的目的等缺点。受此启发，中国证据能力评价的裁量性模式可以借鉴威格摩尔的理论，以详细的、具有指导性意义的规则约束裁量权。
재량성증거가채성인정모식가이해결사법체제운행중적제다문제．기실미국증거제도개혁지초취이경학립료재량성적증거가채성인정모식，가이설재량성증거가채성인정시미국증거법적중요내용。불과미국적재량성증거가채성인정적백년역사중야출현료영향법적가예측성、손해사법공정、배리가채성규칙적목적등결점。수차계발，중국증거능력평개적재량성모식가이차감위격마이적이론，이상세적、구유지도성의의적규칙약속재량권。
The right of discretion to evidence evaluation can solve many problems in the judicial system. In fact, the United States has established discretional model of evidence evaluation in the beginning of its evidence law reform. We can say that the discretional model of evidence evaluation is an important part of American evi- dence law. But there have been some problems appearing in the past one hundred years of evidence law reform such as impacting the predictability of law, injuring the judicial justice and departing from the object of the evi- dence rule. Therefore, the discretional model of evidence evaluation in China should refer Wigmore＇s theory and restrain the discretional power by the particular and detailed evidence rules.